# Remote Work Monitoring Proportionality Assessment Template ## Organisation Details | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Organisation | [Atlas Manufacturing Group] | | Assessment Date | [DD/MM/YYYY] | | Assessor | [Name, Title] | | Remote/Hybrid Workers Affected | [Number] | | Jurisdictions | _________ | ## Proposed Monitoring Technologies | Technology | Proposed? | Proportionate? | Decision | |-----------|:---------:|:--------------:|----------| | Screen capture / recording | [ ] Yes [ ] No | **No** — Disproportionate | Do not deploy | | Webcam monitoring | [ ] Yes [ ] No | **No** — Disproportionate | Do not deploy | | Keystroke logging | [ ] Yes [ ] No | **No** — Disproportionate | Do not deploy | | Mouse / activity tracking | [ ] Yes [ ] No | **No** — Generally disproportionate | Do not deploy | | AI productivity scoring | [ ] Yes [ ] No | **No** — Disproportionate | Do not deploy | | Application usage monitoring | [ ] Yes [ ] No | **May be** — with conditions | Deploy only with safeguards | | Login/logout & VPN logging | [ ] Yes [ ] No | **Yes** — Low intrusiveness | May deploy | ## Output-Based Alternative Assessment | Question | Answer | |----------|--------| | Can objectives be achieved through output-based management? | [ ] Yes [ ] No | | Are clear, measurable objectives set per employee? | [ ] Yes [ ] No | | Are regular 1:1 check-ins in place? | [ ] Yes [ ] No | | Is a task management tool deployed? | [ ] Yes [ ] No | | Is manager training on remote leadership provided? | [ ] Yes [ ] No | If all answers are Yes, monitoring technology is not needed. ## Proportionality Assessment (for any technology proposed) ### Barbulescu Factor Analysis (heightened standard for home context) | Factor | Score (1-5) | Notes | |--------|:-----------:|-------| | 1. Prior notification | _____ | Have employees been informed? | | 2. Extent of monitoring | _____ | What is captured? Home environment risk? | | 3. Legitimate reasons | _____ | Specific, documented objective? | | 4. Less intrusive alternatives | _____ | Output-based management considered? | | 5. Consequences | _____ | Can data lead to adverse decisions? | | 6. Safeguards | _____ | Access controls, retention, grievance? | ### Home Context Risk Assessment | Risk | Likelihood | Severity | Mitigation | |------|-----------|----------|------------| | Capture of family members (incl. children) | _________ | _________ | _________ | | Capture of personal/sensitive content | _________ | _________ | _________ | | Intrusion into private home environment | _________ | _________ | _________ | | Chilling effect on personal activities | _________ | _________ | _________ | ## Decision | Outcome | Detail | |---------|--------| | Monitoring approved? | [ ] Yes (proportionate measures only) [ ] No (output-based management instead) | | Approved technologies | _________ | | Rejected technologies | _________ | | DPIA required? | [ ] Yes (always for remote monitoring) | | Works council consulted? | [ ] Yes [ ] N/A | ## Sign-Off | Role | Name | Signature | Date | |------|------|-----------|------| | Assessor | _________ | _________ | _________ | | DPO | _________ | _________ | _________ | | HR Director | _________ | _________ | _________ |