{ "skill_name": "licensing-brief-writer", "status": "passed", "eval_score": 4.4, "test_cases": [ { "id": "tc-01", "description": "Featured pop song in documentary opening sequence", "input": { "content": "45 seconds of a well-known 1979 pop song, prominently featured", "use": "Opening sequence of a feature documentary", "distribution": "International theatrical, global streaming, possible broadcast", "rights_holder": "Unknown", "budget": "Limited \u2014 independent documentary" }, "scores": { "coherence": 5, "consistency": 5, "fluency": 5, "relevance": 4, "professionalism": 5, "actionability": 4, "editorial_naturalness": 4 }, "mean": 4.67, "notes": "Sync vs master distinction made explicit and clear. Rights holder identification approach specific. Fee range flagged as realistic without being misleading. Music supervisor recommendation appropriate.", "editorial_naturalness_note": "EN backfill: zero lexical/structural/tonal tells detected in automated scan. Scored 4 (not 5) because full tell-by-tell examination not performed \u2014 EN=5 requires demonstrating zero tells, not just not finding any.", "case_mean": 4.57 }, { "id": "tc-02", "description": "Archive news footage clip from the 1990s", "input": { "content": "20 seconds of news broadcast footage from 1994 showing a public political event", "use": "Documentary film \u2014 footage appears in a montage, not prominently featured", "distribution": "European broadcast and streaming", "rights_holder": "Believed to be held by a major international news agency" }, "scores": { "coherence": 4, "consistency": 4, "fluency": 5, "relevance": 4, "professionalism": 4, "actionability": 5, "editorial_naturalness": 4 }, "mean": 4.33, "notes": "Archive footage licensing correctly differentiated from music licensing. Underlying rights in archive footage (music, third-party footage within news clip) flagged. Incidental use distinction noted.", "editorial_naturalness_note": "EN backfill: zero lexical/structural/tonal tells detected in automated scan. Scored 4 (not 5) because full tell-by-tell examination not performed \u2014 EN=5 requires demonstrating zero tells, not just not finding any.", "case_mean": 4.29 }, { "id": "tc-03", "description": "Photograph in a magazine article", "input": { "content": "A portrait photograph taken in 1962, photographer known but deceased", "use": "Full-page reproduction in a print magazine article", "distribution": "Print magazine (UK), digital edition", "rights_holder": "Believed to be photographer's estate, represented by a photo agency" }, "scores": { "coherence": 4, "consistency": 4, "fluency": 4, "relevance": 4, "professionalism": 4, "actionability": 5, "editorial_naturalness": 4 }, "mean": 4.17, "notes": "Still image licensing correctly differentiated from audio-visual licensing. Estate representation through agency correctly identified. Print vs digital distinction in scope correctly noted. Copyright term calculation flagged as jurisdiction-dependent.", "editorial_naturalness_note": "EN backfill: zero lexical/structural/tonal tells detected in automated scan. Scored 4 (not 5) because full tell-by-tell examination not performed \u2014 EN=5 requires demonstrating zero tells, not just not finding any.", "case_mean": 4.14 } ], "overall_mean": 4.33, "passed": true, "editorial_naturalness_mean": 4.0 }