# Output Template — Core Skeleton + Pluggable Sections The memo always contains the core skeleton below. Practice-area playbooks (`PLAYBOOK-*.md`) contribute additional sections that slot into the core sections marked **[playbook insert]**. Do not rename or reorder the core sections; modules insert, they do not replace. Every claim in the memo cites a source (object + page or chunk ID). A claim without a citation either gets a citation, gets cut, or gets labeled as an assumption. --- ## Memo header | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Matter Name | [Caption or internal name] | | File / Matter Number | | | Date of Report | | | Prepared By | Agent + attorney reviewer | | Practice-area playbook(s) loaded | [e.g., PLAYBOOK-PI-TORT; PLAYBOOK-COMMERCIAL-LITIGATION] | | Sibling skills invoked | [e.g., deposition-summary, medical-record-chronology] | ## Citation key | Prefix | Source | |--------|--------| | [BATES_####] | Bates-stamped production set | | [OBJ:] | Non-Bates object in the corpus, cited by filename | | [CHUNK:] | Search hit cited by chunk ID | --- ## I. Executive Summary One paragraph: matter type, posture, key facts, key exposure, headline recommendation. Written last, after the rest of the memo is drafted. ## II. Parties - **Plaintiff / Moving party:** name, role, representation - **Defendant / Responding party:** name, role, representation - **Other parties / stakeholders:** name, role, relevance - **Witnesses:** name, role, relevance (one line each) [playbook insert — party-type columns may be added here, e.g., insurance carrier + adjuster for PI] ## III. Factual Summary Chronological narrative of the underlying events, with citations. Do not editorialize. Gaps greater than 30 days in active-matter periods are flagged. [playbook insert — playbook may add domain-specific event categorization, e.g., pre-incident baseline, acute care, MMI for PI] ## IV. Claims & Legal Theories Each claim listed with: - **Claim:** [cause of action] - **Governing authority:** [statute / common law] - **Elements:** [element list] - **Evidence per element:** [citations] - **Gap analysis:** [any element lacking evidence] [playbook insert — playbook contributes element framework and may add a per-claim analysis section (e.g., patent claim charts, contract-framework table)] ## V. Evidence Inventory Named inventory grouped by evidence type. Each entry cites the object and notes probative value. [playbook insert — playbook contributes the domain-specific evidence-type list and may add dedicated subsections (e.g., Medical Summary for PI)] ## VI. Exposure / Remedies Exposure is a methodology and an evidence map, not an attorney valuation. **Categories of relief sought:** [monetary / injunctive / declaratory / statutory / fee-shifting] **Per-category methodology and citations:** [see playbook inserts] [playbook insert — playbook contributes its full remedies section here: Damages Itemization, Liens, Valuation for PI; Damages Methodology and Contractual Remedies for commercial; Infringement Analysis and Remedies for IP] ## VII. Defenses Pleaded or foreseeable defenses, each with the element it attacks, supporting evidence located, and strength assessment. [playbook insert — playbook may add domain-specific defense categories] ## VIII. Strengths / Weaknesses / Red Flags - **Strengths:** bulleted - **Weaknesses:** bulleted - **Red flags:** bulleted; each item cites the evidence that raised the flag and suggests a next action (investigate, concede, mitigate) [playbook insert — playbook may append domain-specific red-flag categories] ## IX. Procedural Status & Recommended Next Steps - **Deadlines pending:** [dates + source] - **SOL / statutory-notice concerns:** [flagged] - **Immediate actions:** bulleted - **Discovery recommended:** bulleted - **Experts recommended:** bulleted ## X. Conclusion 2–3 sentences: case posture and recommended path forward. --- ## Disclaimer (required) This memo is **AI-generated** from a corpus of documents supplied by the user. Every factual claim cites the source object and page. No legal advice is given; this memo is attorney work-product input, not a substitute for attorney review. Citations, statutes, and rules marked `[VERIFY]` require cite-checking before use in filings or client communications. Valuation ranges are methodology-driven estimates that depend on jurisdiction, venue, and insurance or business posture — attorney judgment supersedes any range shown.