# Requests for Admission — Debt-Buyer Discovery Bank (Oregon) A pre-built bank of Requests for Admission under ORCP 45 to lock in foundational facts in a typical Oregon debt-buyer case. > **NOT LEGAL ADVICE.** Adapt to your case. ## Format Use these as Defendant's First Requests for Admission under ORCP 45. Serve on plaintiff per ORCP 9. Response is due **30 days** (45 if served with summons). **Failure to respond → deemed admitted** under ORCP 45 B. Each request should be **a single, simple fact**. Compound RFAs get partial denials; single-fact RFAs get clean answers. ## Plaintiff's corporate form **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 1**: > Admit that Plaintiff [Velocity Investments, LLC] is a > Delaware limited liability company. **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 2**: > Admit that Plaintiff's principal place of business is in > [state of HQ]. **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 3**: > Admit that Plaintiff is registered to do business in > Oregon as a foreign LLC under ORS 63.700. ## ORS 697 registration **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 4**: > Admit that Plaintiff is a "collection agency" as defined > in ORS 697.005. **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 5**: > Admit that Plaintiff is required to register with the > Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services as a > collection agency under ORS 697.015 to collect debts in > Oregon. **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 6**: > Admit that Plaintiff was registered with the Oregon > Department of Consumer and Business Services as a > collection agency as of [date of filing the Complaint]. **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 7**: > Admit that Plaintiff's registration with the Oregon > Department of Consumer and Business Services has been > continuously maintained from [date Plaintiff acquired the > ACCOUNT] to the present. ## Account specifics **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 8**: > Admit that the Account number ending in [4 digits] was > originally opened with Bank of America. **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 9**: > Admit that the Account was a consumer credit-card account > opened for personal, family, or household purposes. **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 10**: > Admit that the Account was charged off by the Original > Creditor on or about [date of charge-off]. **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 11**: > Admit that the most recent payment by Defendant on the > Account was on [date], in the amount of [$amount]. ## Chain of title **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 12**: > Admit that Plaintiff is not the Original Creditor of the > Account. **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 13**: > Admit that Plaintiff acquired the Account through a > purchase from [identified seller / debt-pool] on or about > [date of purchase]. **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 14**: > Admit that there is a [number] of intermediate debt-buyer > transfers between Bank of America and Plaintiff (i.e., the > Account was sold [N] times before reaching Plaintiff). **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 15**: > Admit that Plaintiff does not have personal knowledge of > Bank of America's regular practices for maintaining > account records. **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 16**: > Admit that Plaintiff does not have a custodian or other > qualified witness from Bank of America who can attest, in > accordance with OEC 803(6), to the regular practices of > Bank of America in maintaining records of the Account. **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 17**: > Admit that the only authentication of Bank of America's > records that Plaintiff intends to rely on at trial is a > declaration from Plaintiff's own employee or contractor. ## Statute of limitations **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 18**: > Admit that the most recent payment by Defendant on the > Account was made on a date that is more than 6 years > before the date this action was filed. **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 19**: > Admit that Plaintiff possesses no document constituting a > written promise to pay by Defendant on the Account dated > within the 6 years before this action was filed. ## Validation notice (FDCPA / Reg F) **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 20**: > Admit that Plaintiff sent a validation notice to Defendant > regarding the Account complying with 15 USC § 1692g(a) > and 12 CFR § 1006.34(b). **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 21**: > Admit that Plaintiff's validation notice to Defendant did > not include the itemization-date information required by > 12 CFR § 1006.34(c)(2)(viii). ## Communications / 7-in-7 **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 22**: > Admit that Plaintiff (directly or through its agents) > communicated with Defendant by telephone more than 7 times > in any 7-day period from [date 1] to [date 2]. ## Net worth (for punitive damages) **REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 23**: > Admit that Plaintiff has net worth exceeding $1,000,000 > as of the date of this Request. ## Strategic deployment ### Phase 1: First wave (RFAs 1–11) Plaintiff's corporate form, registration, basic account facts. Most should be admitted (uncontroversial); the ORS 697 registration ones may be denied or hedged — that's where the defense develops. ### Phase 2: Chain of title (RFAs 12–17) Force plaintiff to admit that: - It is not the original creditor - It acquired through multiple debt-buyer transfers - Its custodian has no personal knowledge of BofA's records - Its only authentication is its own declaration If plaintiff admits these (or fails to respond), the OEC 803(6) / 902(11) foundation problem is essentially conceded. ### Phase 3: SOL (RFAs 18–19) Lock in the SOL defense. If plaintiff admits No. 18 (last payment > 6 years before suit), the SOL is dispositive. ### Phase 4: Counterclaim development (RFAs 20–23) Validation notice, communications, net worth — for the counterclaim case and punitive-damages prosecution. ## Plaintiff response options under ORCP 45 For each RFA, plaintiff must: - **Admit** - **Deny** - **State inability to admit or deny** with specifics — but this requires a reasonable inquiry Compound denials, evasive responses, or general "denied" without specifics are subject to motion under ORCP 45 / 46. ## What to do with the responses If admitted: lock the admission into your case theory; cite it in subsequent motions and at trial. If denied or hedged: prepare to prove the fact at trial OR follow up with RFPs targeting the gap. If plaintiff fails to respond by the 30-day deadline: the RFAs are **deemed admitted** under ORCP 45 B. File a Notice of the deemed admission and rely on it as if a written admission. If plaintiff seeks to withdraw an admission under ORCP 45 C: respond with the "presentation of merits subserved" / "prejudice to requesting party" analysis. Withdrawal is rare in practice. ## Common pitfalls | Pitfall | Consequence | |---------|-------------| | Compound RFA | Partial denials; harder to use at trial | | RFA about a legal conclusion | Plaintiff can refuse to admit; ineffective | | Vague terms | Plaintiff can deny on vagueness grounds | | Forgetting to calendar the 30-day default | Miss the deemed-admission opportunity | | Not following up on hedged responses | Don't develop the record | ## Cross-references - `or-consumer-debt` SKILL — main bundle - `or-discovery` SKILL — discovery framework - `references/rfp-debt-buyer.md` — companion RFPs - `references/fact-patterns.md` — strategic deployment - `or-discovery/references/objection-responses.md` — evaluating plaintiff's responses - `or-law-references/references/civil-rules.md` — ORCP 45 verbatim