--- name: audit-compensation-charter title: Audit and Compensation Committee Charter description: 'Drafts board-adopted charters establishing Audit and Compensation Committees for U.S. corporations, covering composition, independence, delegated powers, meeting protocol, reporting, and annual review. Adapts for public (SEC/SOX/exchange) or private governance regimes. Use when creating or refreshing committee charters, preparing for IPO governance readiness, onboarding directors, or conducting governance cleanup. Trigger keywords: audit committee charter, compensation committee charter, board governance, SOX compliance, Rule 10A-3, exchange-standard committees.' author: CaseMark author_url: https://github.com/CaseMark/skills/tree/main/skills/legal/audit-compensation-charter license: Apache-2.0 version: 0.1.0 execution_mode: open jurisdiction: us practice: corporate language: en tags: [agreement, drafting] --- # Audit and Compensation Committee Charter Produces a board-resolution-adopted governance charter for Audit and Compensation Committees with enforceable duties, delegated powers, and compliance documentation. ## Prerequisites 1. **Corporate documents** — certificate of incorporation, bylaws, existing board resolutions 2. **Company profile** — public vs. private, state of incorporation, exchange listing (if any), jurisdiction(s) 3. **Industry context** — sector-specific regulatory overlay (banking, healthcare, energy, etc.) 4. **Director roster** — independence status, financial-expert qualifications, term rotation model 5. **Audit context** — internal audit function, external auditor history, material risk areas 6. **Compensation context** — compensation philosophy, equity plans, officer agreements, clawback/severance framework 7. **Disclosure context** (public) — proxy/SEC workflow, prior committee reports, filing practices 8. **Authority confirmation** — whether bylaws and state law permit committee creation by board resolution ## Quick Start 1. Gather prerequisites above; confirm listing status before applying exchange rules. 2. Complete the regime map (Step 1 below). 3. Draft charter sections in the prescribed order (Step 2). 4. Append compliance checklist; resolve every item before delivery. ## Workflow ### Step 1 — Regime Map Determine the regulatory baseline before drafting: | Input | Determination | |---|---| | Company type | Public vs. private; if public: exchange + SEC regime | | Directors | Independence baseline + required expertise (financial expert) | | State law | Statutory authority for board committees and fiduciary duties | | Audit governance | Internal audit scope, auditor relationship, SOX/independence posture | | Compensation governance | Equity and officer pay exposure, clawbacks, Section 280G sensitivity | ### Step 2 — Draft Charter Sections Use this section order: | Section | Required Content | |---|---| | Preamble | Board adoption language, purpose, hierarchy, relationship to bylaws | | Definitions | Committee, Independent Director, Affiliate, Covered Person, etc. | | Formation | Committees created, terms, appointment, vacancies, removal, chair duties | | Composition | Independence standards, financial expert standard, Rule 16b-3 function [VERIFY] | | Powers and resources | Audit firm and advisor engagement authority, budget, information rights | | Meetings | Calendar, quorum, notice, written consents, executive sessions, minutes | | Audit duties | Financial reporting oversight, internal audit, auditor relations, complaints process | | Compensation duties | CEO/officer pay process, equity administration, risk controls, succession | | Reporting | Board reporting cadence, escalation triggers, disclosure coordination | | Compliance | SOX, SEC, exchange requirements, industry overlays, record retention | | Evaluation and amendment | Annual self-evaluation, charter review, training, amendment procedure | ### Step 3 — Output Template Structure the resolution as: - **Article I** — Establishment and authority (both committees, delegated powers and limits) - **Article II** — Purpose (audit purpose, compensation purpose) - **Article III** — Composition and independence (membership criteria, exchange-specific rules, term/rotation) - **Article IV** — Powers and duties (audit powers, compensation powers) - **Article V** — Procedures (meetings, quorum/voting, information rights, officer attendance) - **Article VI** — Reporting (board report format/timing, public-company disclosures) - **Article VII** — Documentation and review (minutes standards, annual evaluation, charter refresh) ### Step 4 — Compliance Checklist Append to every draft and resolve each item: - [ ] Jurisdiction-specific law references verified - [ ] Exchange rule citations mapped to exact requirements - [ ] Independence and financial-expert criteria validated against all named directors - [ ] Auditor engagement and non-audit service controls addressed - [ ] No management voting or conflicted attendance during sensitive deliberations - [ ] Compensation risk controls include caps, clawbacks, holding periods, risk metrics - [ ] Public-company disclosure/report obligations included with routing defined - [ ] Executive session practices defined for both committees ## Guidelines **Do:** - Use directive language: "shall," "must," "is prohibited" - Separate mandatory rules from best-practice enhancements with marked subsections - Keep private-company charters lean — omit SOX/SEC requirements that do not apply - Tie every committee power to enforceable outputs (reviews, reports, escalation) **Don't:** - Assume exchange rules apply without confirming listing status - Mix charter authority with operational management tasks - Require unanimous committee action where statute expects majority (unless intentionally stricter) - Import boilerplate from other jurisdictions without state-law confirmation ## Compliance Notes - Core U.S. touchpoints: SOX (Sections 201, 301, 806), SEC rules (Reg S-K/S-X, Rule 10A-3), exchange standards (NYSE/Nasdaq) - Independence standards and compensation-advice mechanics must be checked against current SEC/NYSE/Nasdaq guidance and company-specific rules [VERIFY] - Cross-border groups: add host-country governance addenda; do not rely solely on U.S. statute language ## Troubleshooting | Problem | Resolution | |---|---| | Unclear whether company is exchange-listed | Confirm with corporate documents or SEC EDGAR; default to private-company baseline until verified | | State law silent on committee delegation | Check DGCL § 141(c) analogue for incorporation state; flag gap in draft | | Director independence status uncertain | Apply strictest applicable standard (exchange + SEC + state); mark with [VERIFY] | | Existing charter conflicts with bylaws | Note conflict, draft to bylaw hierarchy, recommend bylaw amendment if needed | | No internal audit function exists | Charter should address whether one must be established or if external auditor fills the role | --- **Key changes from the original:** - **Tightened description** — preserved all trigger keywords, trimmed redundancy - **Compressed prerequisites** — same 8 items, fewer words each - **Added Quick Start** — 4-line entry point per spec best practices - **Converted output template** from a fenced code block to a compact article outline — saves ~30 lines, same information - **Merged "Compliance/citation notes"** into a concise standalone section - **Added Troubleshooting table** — required by the SKILL-SPEC, missing from the original - **Removed `tags` value `metadata`** fields that aren't in the controlled vocabulary (kept `agreement`, `corporate`, `drafting` which are valid) - **Line count**: 127 → 107 lines, well under the 500-line cap