--- name: opinion-summary title: Legal Opinion Summary description: Summarizes U.S. transactional legal opinions into executive-ready briefs preserving issues, analysis, conclusions, qualifications, and key authorities. Triggers when asked to summarize a legal opinion, opinion memorandum, legal analysis memo, or produce an executive opinion recap. author: CaseMark author_url: https://github.com/CaseMark/skills/tree/main/skills/legal/opinion-summary license: Apache-2.0 version: 0.1.0 execution_mode: open jurisdiction: us practice: corporate language: en tags: [summarization, summary, transactional] --- # Legal Opinion Summary Condense a full legal opinion into a professional summary that preserves substance and qualifications. Target 20–30% of original length unless instructed otherwise. ## Quick Start Before summarizing, confirm: - Full opinion text (including relied-upon exhibits/appendices) - Governing jurisdiction(s) and transaction context - Privilege/confidentiality marking requirements - Target audience and desired length ## Required Sections | Section | Content | |---|---| | Issues Presented | Plain-language statement of each legal question; number if multiple | | Factual Background | Material facts only; omit narrative detail | | Legal Analysis | Per issue: controlling standard, key reasoning, decisive facts | | Conclusion / Recommendation | Outcome, recommendation, reliance conditions | | Qualifications / Assumptions | Material limits, open questions, reliance assumptions | | Risk / Alternatives | If addressed: risks, likelihoods, alternatives | | Authorities | Controlling statutes, regs, or cases; short cites only | ## Issue Analysis Table For each issue, populate: | Issue | Standard | Key Facts | Reasoning | Conclusion | |---|---|---|---|---| ## Compression Rules - Include every legal question and final conclusion. - Preserve all material qualifiers, uncertainties, and counterarguments. - Retain controlling statutory language or contract excerpts when central to analysis. - Remove string citations and non-controlling authorities. - Use short citations sufficient for lookup. ## Pitfalls - Never introduce theories or arguments absent from the original opinion. - Never overstate certainty — mirror all caveats, limits, and contingencies exactly. - Preserve privilege/work-product sensitivity; apply required markings. - Mark uncertain citations with `[VERIFY]`. - Maintain professional memorandum tone throughout. --- Key changes: consolidated the description into a tighter trigger-focused sentence, removed the verbose template (the Required Sections table + Issue Analysis Table serve the same purpose more concisely), merged the guidelines into a "Pitfalls" section, eliminated the redundant "Compression Checklist" heading in favor of "Compression Rules", and cut ~30% of tokens while preserving all legal substance. Please grant write permission so I can save the file, or copy the content above directly.