--- name: related-party-transaction-policy title: Related Party Transaction Policy description: Drafts a board-adoptable Related Party Transaction Policy for U.S. corporations governing identification, Audit Committee review, approval, and disclosure of related party transactions. Enforces SEC Item 404(a)/Regulation S-K compliance and stock exchange listing standards. Use when creating or updating RPT policies for public or private companies, or when drafting corporate governance documents addressing conflicts of interest. author: CaseMark author_url: https://github.com/CaseMark/skills/tree/main/skills/legal/related-party-transaction-policy license: Apache-2.0 version: 0.1.0 execution_mode: open jurisdiction: us practice: corporate language: en --- # Related Party Transaction Policy Drafts a Related Party Transaction Policy with Audit Committee governance, SEC-compliant disclosure, and fiduciary duty safeguards. ## Prerequisites 1. **Company profile** — legal name, state of incorporation, public/private status, exchange listing (NYSE/Nasdaq) 2. **Governance documents** — certificate of incorporation, bylaws, Audit Committee charter, Code of Ethics 3. **Existing RPTs** — current or anticipated related party relationships or transactions 4. **Dollar threshold** — internal approval threshold (common: $120K, $250K, or $500K) ## Quick Start 1. Collect prerequisites above 2. Draft policy sections in order below 3. Calibrate thresholds — SEC disclosure floor is $120K (Item 404(a) of Reg. S-K); set internal pre-approval trigger at or above that 4. Cross-reference Audit Committee charter to avoid conflicting governance authority 5. Format as 4–7 page board-adoptable document with signature lines ## Policy Sections ### 1. Header & Purpose - Title: `[Corporation Legal Name] Related Party Transaction Policy and Procedures` - Purpose: transparency, conflict prevention, SEC compliance, shareholder protection - Include effective date, version number, adoption authority (full Board) ### 2. Definitions | Term | Definition | |---|---| | **Related Party** | Directors, executive officers, nominees, >5% beneficial owners of any voting class, and their immediate family members | | **Immediate Family Member** | Spouse, parents, children, siblings, in-laws, household members (non-tenant/employee) | | **Related Party Transaction** | Transaction where (a) aggregate amount exceeds threshold, (b) company/subsidiary is participant, (c) Related Party has direct/indirect material interest | | **Material Interest** | Excludes: director/officer position at the company; <10% ownership of counterparty | Covered transaction examples: property/service sales, consulting/employment arrangements outside ordinary course, loans/guarantees, charitable contributions where Related Party is officer/director. ### 3. Identification Procedures - **Individual duty**: Directors and executive officers must disclose potential RPTs to Audit Committee Chair and General Counsel before any binding commitment - **Institutional controls**: Legal, Finance, and Internal Audit monitor vendor relationships, significant contracts, expense reports, investment activities, charitable contributions - **Annual questionnaires**: All directors and executive officers disclose related party relationships ### 4. Audit Committee Review & Approval - **Exclusive authority**: Audit Committee approves; interested parties recuse from deliberation and voting - **Submission materials**: transaction terms, nature of interest, business purpose, arm's-length comparables, ordinary course analysis - **Standard**: Committee determines in good faith the transaction is **fair and reasonable** and in the company's and shareholders' best interests - **Ongoing RPTs**: Annual re-review required; Committee may set standing guidelines for recurring arrangements ### 5. Pre-Approved Categories | Category | Condition | |---|---| | Executive compensation | Board or Compensation Committee approved | | Director compensation | Full Board approved | | Non-executive counterparty employee | Related Party holds <10% equity in counterparty | | Broad-based benefit plans | Same terms for all employees | | De minimis transactions | Below Audit Committee threshold | ### 6. Disclosure Obligations (Public Companies) - Disclose RPTs meeting SEC thresholds per **Item 404 of Reg. S-K** in proxy statements, 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K - General Counsel and CFO own accuracy, completeness, and timeliness - Audit Committee reviews RPT disclosures before SEC filing inclusion - Consider full Board reporting regardless of public disclosure requirement ### 7. Administration & Enforcement | Topic | Provision | |---|---| | Administrator | Audit Committee | | Annual review | Committee reassesses; recommends amendments to Board | | Material amendments | Require Board approval; disclose per law and exchange rules | | Non-compliance | Disciplinary action up to termination; rescission, modification, or ratification of unapproved transactions; disgorgement of profits | ### 8. Formatting - Numbered sections with descriptive headings - Page headers: company name + policy title; footers: page numbers - Signature lines for Audit Committee Chair and Corporate Secretary - Cross-references to Audit Committee charter, Code of Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines ## Pitfalls & Checks - **Public vs. private**: SEC disclosure (Item 404, Reg. S-K) applies only to reporting companies; private companies tailor disclosure but still need substantive approval procedures - **Exchange rules**: Nasdaq Rule 5630 and NYSE Manual §314 impose independent director approval — verify current rule numbers against exchange manuals - **State law**: Delaware entire fairness standard may apply if approval procedures are not followed; most states impose similar fiduciary overlay - **Definition scope**: Consider extending Related Party to entities where covered persons hold ≥10% equity or serve as executive officer/general partner - **Ratification**: Address whether Audit Committee can ratify transactions entered without prior approval, and under what conditions - **Charter consistency**: Policy terminology and authority must not conflict with existing Audit Committee charter