# LEDES Billing Format Specifications ## Overview LEDES (Legal Electronic Data Exchange Standard) is the standardized format for electronic legal billing accepted by major corporations and insurance companies worldwide. ## LEDES 1998B Format The most widely adopted format, using pipe-delimited flat files. ### File Structure ``` LEDES1998B[] INVOICE_DATE|INVOICE_NUMBER|CLIENT_ID|LAW_FIRM_MATTER_ID|INVOICE_TOTAL|...[] 20240115|INV-2024-001|CLIENT001|MATTER-12345|15750.00|...[] ``` ### Required Header Fields | Field Position | Field Name | Max Length | Description | |----------------|------------|------------|-------------| | 1 | INVOICE_DATE | 8 | YYYYMMDD format | | 2 | INVOICE_NUMBER | 35 | Unique invoice identifier | | 3 | CLIENT_ID | 24 | Client's internal ID | | 4 | LAW_FIRM_MATTER_ID | 24 | Law firm's matter number | | 5 | INVOICE_TOTAL | 12.2 | Total invoice amount | | 6 | BILLING_START_DATE | 8 | Period start YYYYMMDD | | 7 | BILLING_END_DATE | 8 | Period end YYYYMMDD | | 8 | INVOICE_DESCRIPTION | 500 | Invoice summary | ### Line Item Fields | Field | Description | Required | |-------|-------------|----------| | LINE_ITEM_NUMBER | Sequential line number | Yes | | EXP/FEE/INV_ADJ_TYPE | F=Fee, E=Expense, IF=Invoice Fee Adj | Yes | | LINE_ITEM_DATE | Service date YYYYMMDD | Yes | | LINE_ITEM_TASK_CODE | UTBMS task code | Conditional | | LINE_ITEM_EXPENSE_CODE | UTBMS expense code | Conditional | | LINE_ITEM_ACTIVITY_CODE | UTBMS activity code | Conditional | | TIMEKEEPER_ID | Firm's timekeeper ID | Yes for fees | | LINE_ITEM_DESCRIPTION | Narrative description | Yes | | LINE_ITEM_UNIT_COST | Hourly rate or unit cost | Yes | | LINE_ITEM_NUMBER_OF_UNITS | Hours or quantity | Yes | | LINE_ITEM_TOTAL | Line total amount | Yes | ## LEDES 2000 Format (XML) XML-based format for complex billing scenarios. ### Basic Structure ```xml 2024-01-15 INV-2024-001 CLIENT001 Acme Corporation MATTER-12345 Smith v. Jones Litigation FEE L110 A101 Review complaint and exhibits 2.5 450.00 1125.00 ``` ## LEDES 2.2 (eBilling Hub Standard) Enhanced XML format with support for: - Alternative fee arrangements - Budget tracking - Accrual reporting - Split billing ## Field Validation Rules ### Date Fields - Format: YYYYMMDD (1998B) or YYYY-MM-DD (XML) - Invoice date cannot be future dated - Line item dates must fall within billing period ### Amount Fields - Decimal precision: 2 places - Negative amounts indicate credits - Currency specified at invoice level ### Text Fields - Block billing prohibited (separate entries for distinct tasks) - Minimum description length typically 10+ characters - No special characters: | [ ] (1998B only) ## Common Rejection Reasons 1. **Missing UTBMS Codes** - Task/activity codes required 2. **Block Billing** - Multiple tasks in single entry 3. **Vague Descriptions** - Insufficient detail 4. **Rate Violations** - Exceeds agreed-upon rates 5. **Format Errors** - Invalid characters, wrong delimiters ## E-Billing Vendor Requirements ### Serengeti/LegalTracker - LEDES 1998B primary - Requires timekeeper ID mapping - 90-day submission window ### Legal Tracker (Thomson Reuters) - LEDES 1998B and 2000 - Supports accruals - Budget variance alerts ### CounselLink (LexisNexis) - LEDES 1998B standard - Matter-level validation - Rate card enforcement ### Brightflag - LEDES 1998B and custom JSON - AI-powered review - Real-time validation ## Sample LEDES 1998B File ``` LEDES1998B[] INVOICE_DATE|INVOICE_NUMBER|CLIENT_ID|LAW_FIRM_MATTER_ID|INVOICE_TOTAL|BILLING_START_DATE|BILLING_END_DATE|INVOICE_DESCRIPTION|LAW_FIRM_ID|LINE_ITEM_NUMBER|EXP/FEE/INV_ADJ_TYPE|LINE_ITEM_NUMBER_OF_UNITS|LINE_ITEM_ADJUSTMENT_AMOUNT|LINE_ITEM_TOTAL|LINE_ITEM_DATE|LINE_ITEM_TASK_CODE|LINE_ITEM_EXPENSE_CODE|LINE_ITEM_ACTIVITY_CODE|TIMEKEEPER_ID|LINE_ITEM_DESCRIPTION|LAW_FIRM_NAME|LINE_ITEM_UNIT_COST|TIMEKEEPER_NAME|TIMEKEEPER_CLASSIFICATION|CLIENT_MATTER_ID[] 20240115|INV-2024-001|ACME001|M-2024-0001|2325.00|20240101|20240115|Legal Services - January 2024|LAWFIRM01|1|F|2.5|0.00|1125.00|20240108|L110||A101|TK001|Review and analyze complaint and supporting exhibits; identify key factual allegations|Smith & Associates|450.00|John Smith|PARTNER|ACME-LIT-001[] 20240115|INV-2024-001|ACME001|M-2024-0001|2325.00|20240101|20240115|Legal Services - January 2024|LAWFIRM01|2|F|3.0|0.00|900.00|20240110|L110||A102|TK002|Research applicable statutes of limitation; draft research memorandum|Smith & Associates|300.00|Jane Doe|ASSOCIATE|ACME-LIT-001[] 20240115|INV-2024-001|ACME001|M-2024-0001|2325.00|20240101|20240115|Legal Services - January 2024|LAWFIRM01|3|E|1|0.00|300.00|20240112||E110||TK001|Westlaw research charges for January 2024|Smith & Associates|300.00|||ACME-LIT-001[] ``` ## Best Practices 1. **Validate before submission** - Use LEDES validation tools 2. **Map timekeepers early** - Register with e-billing system 3. **Review billing guidelines** - Each client has specific requirements 4. **Track rejections** - Identify patterns in rejections 5. **Archive submissions** - Retain copies with confirmation numbers