# HITECH Act Privacy — Workflows ## Workflow 1: HITECH Penalty Tier Assessment ``` HIPAA Violation Identified │ ├── Step 1: Determine Culpability Level │ │ │ ├── Did the entity know about the violation? │ │ ├── NO → Did not know AND would not have known with reasonable diligence? │ │ │ └── YES → Tier A (Did Not Know) │ │ │ └── NO → Tier B (Reasonable Cause) │ │ │ │ │ └── YES → Was it willful neglect? │ │ ├── NO → Tier B (Reasonable Cause) │ │ └── YES → Was it corrected within 30 days of knowledge? │ │ ├── YES → Tier C (Willful Neglect, Timely Corrected) │ │ └── NO → Tier D (Willful Neglect, Not Corrected) │ │ Investigation and penalty MANDATORY │ ├── Step 2: Determine Penalty Range (2024 inflation-adjusted) │ │ │ ├── Tier A: $137 - $68,928 per violation; $2,067,813 annual cap │ ├── Tier B: $1,379 - $68,928 per violation; $2,067,813 annual cap │ ├── Tier C: $13,785 - $68,928 per violation; $2,067,813 annual cap │ └── Tier D: $68,928 - $2,067,813 per violation; $2,067,813 annual cap │ ├── Step 3: Mitigating Factors │ ├── Recognized security practices in place for 12+ months (§13412)? │ │ ├── NIST CSF implementation │ │ ├── HITRUST certification │ │ └── Section 405(d) HICP practices │ ├── History of compliance │ ├── Financial condition of the entity │ ├── Cooperation with OCR investigation │ └── Number of individuals affected │ └── Step 4: Resolution ├── Informal resolution (technical assistance) ├── Resolution agreement (settlement + corrective action plan) └── Civil monetary penalty (formal adjudication) ``` ## Workflow 2: State AG HIPAA Enforcement Process ``` State AG Identifies Potential HIPAA Violation │ ├── Step 1: Investigation │ ├── Consumer complaints received by AG office │ ├── Breach affecting state residents identified │ ├── Investigation of entity practices in the state │ └── Coordinate with state consumer protection division │ ├── Step 2: Mandatory HHS Notice │ ├── State AG must notify HHS Secretary before filing suit │ ├── Provide HHS with details of intended action │ └── HHS has right to intervene and assume primary responsibility │ ├── Step 3: Is there a pending HHS action? │ ├── YES → State AG may NOT bring action during pending HHS action │ └── NO → State AG may proceed │ ├── Step 4: Civil Action in Federal District Court │ ├── File on behalf of state residents affected │ ├── Seek injunctive relief │ ├── Seek damages (up to $100/violation, $25,000/year per identical violation) │ ├── Seek attorneys' fees and costs │ └── May proceed alongside state consumer protection claims │ └── Step 5: Resolution ├── Consent decree / settlement agreement ├── Injunctive orders requiring compliance improvements ├── Monetary penalties paid to the state └── Monitoring and reporting obligations ``` ## Workflow 3: Promoting Interoperability Privacy Attestation ``` CMS Promoting Interoperability Program Reporting Period │ ├── Step 1: Security Risk Analysis │ ├── Conduct or review security risk analysis (required for attestation) │ ├── Document analysis covers all ePHI │ ├── Address identified risks with security updates │ └── Correct identified security deficiencies │ ├── Step 2: Privacy Measure Compliance │ ├── Patient electronic access to health information │ │ ├── Provide portal access within 36 hours of availability │ │ └── Measure: >80% of patients offered access │ ├── Secure messaging │ │ └── Patients can send secure messages to care team │ ├── Electronic prescribing │ │ └── Prescriptions transmitted electronically │ └── Health information exchange │ └── Support interoperability with external providers │ ├── Step 3: Attestation │ ├── Attest that security risk analysis was conducted │ ├── Attest that security deficiencies were corrected │ ├── Report on privacy-related measures │ └── Submit attestation to CMS within reporting period │ └── Failure to Attest ├── Payment adjustment (penalty for non-participation) ├── Hardship exceptions available in limited circumstances └── Future participation requirements ```