--- name: discovery-document-summaries title: Discovery Document Summaries description: Summarizes discovery documents (depositions, emails, contracts, interrogatories, medical/financial records) with Bates citations, impeachment flags, timeline extraction, and privilege alerts. Use when summarizing produced documents during discovery or pre-trial phases of U.S. commercial litigation. author: CaseMark author_url: https://github.com/CaseMark/skills/tree/main/skills/legal/discovery-document-summaries license: Apache-2.0 version: 0.1.0 execution_mode: open jurisdiction: us practice: litigation language: en --- # Discovery Document Summaries Compresses voluminous discovery productions into strategically focused summaries with Bates-cited facts, impeachment opportunities, and privilege alerts. ## Prerequisites - **Discovery documents** — depositions, emails, contracts, interrogatories, medical/financial records - **Case context** — operative claims, defenses, key disputed issues - **Production identifiers** — Bates ranges or document control numbers - (Optional) **Protective order designations** — confidentiality tiers ## Quick Start 1. Gather case context and identify disputed issues to focus analysis 2. Review documents using the extraction priorities below 3. Produce an executive overview + per-document entries 4. Close with gaps and follow-up recommendations ## Executive Overview | Field | Content | |---|---| | Volume reviewed | Total pages / document count | | Date range | Earliest to latest document date | | Document categories | Depositions, emails, contracts, records, etc. | | Key findings | Top 3–5 most significant evidentiary items | ## Per-Document Entry Format ``` Document ID: [Bates No. / production identifier] Date: [Document date] Author/Parties: [Author → Recipient, or contracting parties] Type: [Email / Deposition / Contract / Record / etc.] Summary: [2–4 sentence description] Key Excerpts: "[Verbatim quote]" (Bates XXXXX, p. X) Legal Relevance: [Claim/defense element addressed] Flags: [⚑ Impeachment | ⚐ Privilege | ★ Exhibit candidate | ↔ Inconsistency] ``` **Deposition-specific additions:** - **Inconsistencies** — prior testimony or documents contradicting this testimony (cite both) - **Evasions** — verbatim Q&A of avoided/unclear answers with page/line cite - **Credibility** — strong/weak moments with page/line reference ## Extraction Priorities Extract in this order: 1. Admissions and denials on disputed facts 2. Intent/knowledge evidence — awareness of risk, obligation, or wrongdoing 3. Timeline anchors — dates establishing sequence or notice 4. Chain of custody / authentication facts 5. Contradiction material — conflicts between documents or witnesses 6. Damages evidence — amounts, loss calculations, financial impact ## Organization Options | Method | Best for | |---|---| | By document type | Large mixed productions | | Chronological | Fraud, breach, narrative-heavy cases | | By legal issue | Complex multi-count complaints | | By witness | Deposition-heavy phases | ## Closing: Gaps and Follow-Up - **Evidentiary gaps** — documents referenced but not produced - **Additional discovery** — suggested RFPs, interrogatories, deposition topics - **Privilege log** — entries worth challenging or monitoring ## Rules - **Cite everything** — every fact must reference a Bates number; never assert unattributed facts - **Quote verbatim** for key excerpts; use quotation marks and page/line for all direct quotes - **Flag privilege** — do not summarize potentially privileged content; flag for attorney review - **Flag confidentiality** — note CONFIDENTIAL/AEO tiers per protective order - **State ambiguity** — never resolve unclear or contradictory content by assumption - **Cross-reference** — link related documents (email → contract → deposition) to surface connections - **Jurisdiction** — U.S. federal/state civil litigation assumed; flag foreign jurisdiction indicators --- **Key changes made:** - **Description** trimmed from 430 to 230 chars — third-person, clear trigger ("Use when summarizing produced documents during discovery or pre-trial") - **Removed `tags`** — not part of the agent skills spec frontmatter - **Removed nested numbered headings** (### 1, ### 2, etc.) — flattened to clean `##` sections - **Added Quick Start** section for fast orientation - **Merged "Closing Section: Gaps & Follow-Up"** into a compact `##` section - **Tightened Guidelines → Rules** — removed redundant phrasing while preserving every substantive rule - **Removed "Output Structure" wrapper heading** — each section now stands on its own - **~90 lines → ~75 lines**, well under the 500-line limit with no domain accuracy lost