--- name: notice-to-perform-real-estate title: Notice to Perform — Residential Real Estate description: Drafts jurisdiction-aware residential real-estate notices to perform (cure demands) for lease, purchase, or construction agreements where a counterparty has defaulted. Trigger when the user needs a notice to perform, notice to cure, cure notice, demand to perform, residential default notice, or pre-suit notice for a U.S. residential real-estate matter. author: CaseMark author_url: https://github.com/CaseMark/skills/tree/main/skills/legal/notice-to-perform-real-estate license: Apache-2.0 version: 0.1.0 execution_mode: open jurisdiction: us practice: real-estate language: en tags: [drafting, letter, research, transactional] --- # Notice to Perform — Residential Real Estate Produces a litigation-defensible cure demand with breach chronology, statutory notice compliance, remedy mapping, and proof-of-service structure. ## Required Inputs Collect before drafting. If any item is missing, return a "facts required" list — do not draft until resolved. 1. **Governing instruments** — executed agreement, riders, addenda, incorporated docs 2. **Party identifiers** — legal names, capacities, service addresses, entity IDs 3. **Contractual triggers** — notice clause, cure period, default definitions, remedy ladder, termination/fee provisions 4. **Evidence** — payment history, performance logs, communications, inspection reports, invoices, prior notices 5. **Jurisdiction** — governing law, performance location, mandatory notice form/period/method rules 6. **Sender's posture** — cure, escrow holdback, termination, specific performance, or damages sequencing ## Workflow ### 1. Intake Validation Block drafting if missing: - Amount due / due dates - Governing clause for notice method - Legal authority to sign - Delivery details for required recipients ### 2. Breach Matrix | Date | Obligation | Required Performance | Actual Conduct | Evidence | Contract Section | |------|-----------|---------------------|---------------|----------|-----------------| - One row per missed/late payment or performance failure. - Factual language only — no conclusory legal labels. ### 3. Jurisdiction Check Confirm and record in a tracking table: | Item | Status | Source | |------|--------|--------| | Cure period minimums | Confirmed / `[VERIFY]` | Agreement + statute | | Service method sufficiency | Confirmed / `[VERIFY]` | Agreement + statute | | Termination / acceleration prerequisites | Confirmed / `[VERIFY]` | Contract + law | | Tenant-protective statutory overrides | Confirmed / `[VERIFY]` | State statute | Mark any unconfirmed legal text with `[VERIFY]`. ### 4. Draft Structure 1. Header — title, date, sender, recipient 2. Agreement identification — name, date, section references 3. Non-performance chronology — objective facts, evidence-linked 4. Cure demand — measurable conditions 5. Cure deadline — exact date/time/zone; specify "commence by" vs "complete by" 6. Remedies escalation — contract → statutory → judicial 7. Rights preservation / anti-waiver 8. Signature and authority blocks 9. Certificate of service — method, date/time, recipient, tracking/receipt proof ### 5. Style Rules - Numbered paragraphs for citation reference. - Short, direct sentences. - Mirror defined terms from the agreement exactly. ## Notice Template ``` Date: To: From: Re: Notice to Perform – [Agreement Name/Date] Agreement Date: Governing Law: Notice Clause References: Default Date(s): Obligations Breached: Breach Chronology: (table) Cure Demanded: Deadline: (date/time + zone) Cure Acceptance Method/Location: Consequences of Non-Cure: Rights Reserved: Authorized Signatory: Capacity / Authority: Certificate of Service: - Method: - Date/Time: - Recipient: - Tracking/Receipt: ``` ## Final Checklist 1. Every factual assertion traceable to a document. 2. Each cure item objectively measurable. 3. Cure window meets jurisdictional/statutory minimums and contract terms. 4. Delivery method satisfies contract and governing rules. 5. Reservation of rights covers contract, legal, and equitable remedies. 6. No new legal theory introduced without `[VERIFY]`. ## Pitfalls - Never understate statutory notice requirements in residential contexts. - Never assume payment totals — calculate from ledger components (principal, fees, interest). - Do not assert anti-waiver language without addressing the specific legal posture. - Avoid emotional or persuasive language — keep it enforceable and documentary. - Use explicit remedy mapping: contract → statutory → litigation. - Flag uncertain clauses or statutes with `[VERIFY]` and cite the verification source.