# Example: Small Business Issuing 1099-NEC to a Web Designer A complete walkthrough of issuing Form 1099-NEC for a $3,500 freelance web design payment that crosses the 2026 $2,000 threshold. This is the canonical "small business hiring an individual contractor" pattern. ## The payer - **Name**: Bright Roast Coffee LLC (single-member LLC taxed as S-corp) - **EIN**: 87-2143XXX - **Address**: 412 Lyon St, Asheville, NC 28801 - **Tax year**: 2026 (filing in early 2027) - **Filing situation**: 4 1099-NECs total + 1 1099-MISC for landlord rent = 5 information returns. Below the 10-form e-filing threshold, but Bright Roast still chose to e-file via IRIS for simplicity. ## The payee - **Name**: Sam Patel (individual, sole proprietor doing business as "Patel Studio") - **W-9 status**: Sam returned a signed W-9 to Bright Roast on May 3, 2026, showing: - Line 1: Sam Patel - Line 2: Patel Studio (DBA) - Line 3a: Individual/sole proprietor - Part I (TIN): SSN 401-XX-XXXX - Lines 5–6: 1227 Charlotte St, Asheville, NC 28801 - Part II: certified, not subject to backup withholding - **TIN matching**: Bright Roast verified Sam's name + SSN combo via IRS TIN Matching on May 4, 2026. Match confirmed. ## The transactions | Date | Invoice description | Amount | Payment method | |------|---------------------|--------|----------------| | 2026-05-15 | Website redesign — initial 50% retainer | $1,750 | Direct ACH (Bright Roast bank → Sam bank) | | 2026-07-01 | Website redesign — final 50% on launch | $1,750 | Direct ACH | | **Total to Sam Patel in 2026** | | **$3,500** | | No reimbursable expenses. No goods involved (services only). No backup withholding (W-9 valid). ## Decision: 1099-NEC required? Per the threshold rules: - Total paid in 2026: $3,500 - 2026 threshold: $2,000 (P.L. 119-21 §70433) - $3,500 ≥ $2,000 → **1099-NEC required** Per payee classification: - Sam is an Individual / sole proprietor (per W-9 Line 3a) → not a corporation → **subject to 1099-NEC** Per payment channel: - Payments were direct ACH (bank-to-bank, no third-party payment network in between) → **payer issues 1099-NEC** (no 1099-K from any platform) **Conclusion**: Bright Roast issues 1099-NEC to Sam. ## The completed 1099-NEC ``` PAYER's name, address, phone: Bright Roast Coffee LLC 412 Lyon St Asheville, NC 28801 (828) 555-0142 PAYER's TIN: 87-2143XXX RECIPIENT's TIN: XXX-XX-XXXX (truncated on Copy B; full SSN on Copy A) RECIPIENT's name: Sam Patel RECIPIENT's address: 1227 Charlotte St Asheville, NC 28801 Account number: BRIGHT-2026-002 (internal; Bright Roast's contractor ID for Sam) Form 1099-NEC (Rev. December 2026), calendar year 2026 Box 1a — Nonemployee compensation: $3,500.00 Box 1b — Cash tips: (blank) Box 1c — TTOC: (blank) Box 1d — Overtime compensation: (blank) Box 2 — Direct sales of consumer products ≥ $5,000: ☐ (unchecked) Box 3 — Excess golden parachute payments: (blank) Box 4 — Federal income tax withheld: $0.00 Box 5 — State tax withheld: $0.00 Box 6 — State / Payer's state no.: NC / 87-2143XXX Box 7 — State income: $3,500.00 ``` ## Filing checklist - [x] Recipient Copy B mailed to Sam by the due date, February 1, 2027 (January 31, 2027 is a Sunday) — postmarked January 24, 2027 - [x] Copy A filed with IRS via IRIS by February 1, 2027 (submitted January 25, 2027; IRIS confirmation #2027NEC-XXXXXX) - [x] State copy: NC is a CF/SF participant; IRIS forwarded to NC Department of Revenue automatically - [x] Records retained: W-9, TIN match confirmation, ACH transaction records, copy of 1099-NEC, IRIS submission ID - [x] No Form 945 needed (no backup withholding applied) ## Why each non-obvious choice **Why ACH instead of Stripe / PayPal?** Bright Roast considered paying through Stripe but Sam preferred direct ACH. The choice matters for 1099 reporting: ACH = direct payment = payer's 1099-NEC obligation. Card or third-party-network payment = reportable only on Form 1099-K by the platform (if its threshold is met), so the payer doesn't issue 1099-NEC. **Why TIN match before paying the second invoice?** Bright Roast's policy is to TIN-match every contractor before the first payment. If Sam's W-9 had failed matching, Bright Roast would have requested a corrected W-9 and applied backup withholding on subsequent payments until resolved. In Sam's case, TIN matched on May 4 (before the May 15 first payment), so no backup withholding needed. **Why include account number?** It's optional, but Bright Roast uses it to track which recipient + which year. If Sam works again in 2027 or other relationships emerge, the account number distinguishes contracts. The IRS doesn't require it, but it's good practice for the payer's records. **Why NC in Box 6 / Box 7?** Sam is a NC resident performing services in NC. Box 6 carries Bright Roast's NC state ID (their EIN, which they registered with NC for business purposes). Box 7 = the income attributable to NC ($3,500, all of it). **Why no backup withholding?** Sam's W-9 was valid, TIN matched IRS records, and Sam certified Part II that they're not subject to backup withholding. None of the §3406 conditions apply. ## What if something had been different **If Sam had been an S-corp**: Bright Roast would have NOT issued 1099-NEC. Corporations are exempt for services (except legal services, reported on 1099-NEC, and medical payments, reported on 1099-MISC). Bright Roast would still keep the W-9 on file as proof of corporate status. **If Bright Roast had paid Sam via Stripe instead of ACH**: the payments would belong on Form 1099-K from the platform, not on Bright Roast's 1099-NEC. For third-party network transactions the platform files a 1099-K only if Sam received more than $20,000 and more than 200 transactions in the year (IRC §6050W(e) as restored by P.L. 119-21), so for $3,500 Sam would likely get no form at all — and would still report the income. **If Sam had failed TIN matching**: Bright Roast would have: 1. Requested a corrected, certified W-9 (if the IRS later sent a CP2100 notice, Bright Roast would send Sam a B-Notice, first or second depending on history) 2. Withheld 24% on payments while no valid TIN was on file (and, after an IRS notice, on payments made more than 30 business days after receiving it) 3. Withheld 24% of each subsequent payment 4. Deposited withheld amounts via EFTPS 5. Filed Form 945 by February 1, 2027 reporting backup withholding on line 2 6. Issued 1099-NEC with Box 4 > 0 (the withheld amount) **If total paid had been $1,800** (below the 2026 $2,000 threshold): no 1099-NEC required. Sam still has to report the $1,800 as income on Sam's Schedule C (income is taxable regardless of 1099 issuance). **If Bright Roast had paid 12 contractors $3,500 each** in 2026: total information returns = 12 → at or above the 10-return threshold → e-filing mandatory (IRC §6011(e); T.D. 9972). Paper filing would trigger penalty for the returns beyond 10. ## Sources cited - IRS Form 1099-NEC, Rev. December 2026 (https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1099nec.pdf) - IRS Instructions for Forms 1099-MISC and 1099-NEC, Rev. December 2026 (https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i1099mec.pdf) - IRC §6041, §6041A, §3406 - P.L. 119-21 §70433 (2026 threshold raised to $2,000) - Reg. §301.6109-4 (TIN truncation on payee statements) - W-9 Instructions (Reg. §301.6109-1(d)(2))