--- name: healthcare-agent-instruction-letter title: Healthcare Agent Instruction Letter description: Drafts a non-binding healthcare values/instruction letter for a designated health care agent to guide substituted-judgment decisions during incapacity. Use when a client needs a bedside document that harmonizes with a health care power of attorney, healthcare proxy, or advance directive and captures quality-of-life thresholds, treatment preferences, and conflict guidance. Trigger on requests for "instruction letter," "health care agent letter," "values letter," "legacy letter," "healthcare proxy," or "DPOA health care." author: CaseMark author_url: https://github.com/CaseMark/skills/tree/main/skills/legal/healthcare-agent-instruction-letter license: Apache-2.0 version: 0.1.0 execution_mode: open jurisdiction: us practice: trusts-and-estates language: en tags: [drafting, letter, regulatory, transactional] --- # Healthcare Agent Instruction Letter Drafts a scenario-based, non-binding values letter in the client's voice to empower the health care agent and reduce ambiguity at the bedside. Output supplements—never replaces—operative legal directives. ## Quick Start 1. Confirm client identity, preferred name, and jurisdiction. 2. Collect executed documents (name/date/type): health care POA or proxy, advance directive, POLST/MOLST, HIPAA release. 3. Identify primary agent and alternates (full names, roles, contact preferences). 4. Capture core values: quality-of-life thresholds, cognition-loss tolerance, dependence, pain, institutional care. 5. Capture clinical preferences: CPR, ventilation, artificial nutrition/hydration, antibiotics, surgery, time-limited trials, hospice, comfort care. 6. Capture spiritual/cultural commitments affecting care decisions. 7. Identify conflict vectors and family communication plan. 8. Capture tone preference, distribution timing, and document-storage locations. 9. Never invent names, dates, diagnoses, or beliefs—ask for missing facts and use `[placeholder]`. ## Core Workflow | Phase | Action | Output | |-------|--------|--------| | 1 | Validate non-binding status | Opening disclaimer: guidance only, not a substitute for operative directives | | 2 | Harmonize documents | List governing document titles/dates; note instruction hierarchy | | 3 | Elicit decision framework | Big-Three thresholds: cognition, independence, suffering | | 4 | Draft scenario logic | Treatment sections with conditional "if/when…then…" examples | | 5 | Add faith/culture mechanics | Practical care requests tied to beliefs, without legal overstatement | | 6 | Address conflict protocol | Disagreement scripts, consult triggers, clinician communication | | 7 | Add logistics | Distribution plan: who receives, when, storage locations | | 8 | Run quality controls | Mismatch flags, ambiguity reduction, attorney-review gate | ### Writing Constraints - Client voice, plain language, short headings, 1–3 pages. - Conditional framing throughout: "if/when…then…" with scenario examples. - No medical orders or statutory language belonging in POLST/MOLST/clinic forms. - Every section must be usable under stress by one reader in minutes. ## Letter Template Fill only known facts; use `[placeholder]` where missing. ```text Date: [date] To: [Primary Agent], [Alternate(s)] Re: My Values and Medical Decision Guidance I wrote this letter to guide my agent if I cannot speak for myself. I have executed [document names/dates]; this letter supplements and does not replace them. 1) Decision-Makers - [Primary Agent], [Alternate Agent] - Use substituted judgment: do what I would want, not what feels least difficult. 2) What Matters Most - Good-day definition: - Non-negotiable values/limits: - Cognitive/function thresholds: - Pain, comfort, dignity standards: 3) Treatment Preferences - CPR / intensive care: - Ventilation / breathing support: - Feeding / hydration: - Dialysis / infection treatment: - Surgery / rehab vs. noninvasive care: - Time-limited trials: - Pain control / sedation: - Preferred care setting: 4) Spiritual, Cultural, and Personal Preferences - Practices/rituals: - Clergy or contacts: - Religious limits or accommodations: 5) Conflict and Communication - Who should be included: - Who may contest: - Protocol: ethics/palliative consults, second opinions, family meeting trigger: 6) Closing - Permission grant: - Document storage locations: - Distribution instructions: Signature: ``` ## Post-Draft Checks - [ ] Non-binding disclaimer appears in opening and closing. - [ ] No contradiction with operative legal documents; discrepancies flagged separately. - [ ] No invented facts; `[placeholder]` tags remain for missing data. - [ ] Treatment guidance is scenario-based, not slogans. - [ ] Conflict instructions protect agent authority consistent with legal appointment. - [ ] No absolute commands implying standalone legal effect. - [ ] Attorney-review gate and confidentiality note included. ## Jurisdictional Guardrails | Topic | Rule | |-------|------| | Terminology | Match client documents: "health care proxy," "medical power of attorney," "advance health care directive," etc. | | POLST/MOLST | Do not draft as an order form; recommend separate clinical workflow [VERIFY]. | | Heightened-evidence jurisdictions | Use heightened specificity where clear-and-convincing evidence may be required for life-sustaining-treatment disputes (e.g., *In re Storar*, 52 N.Y.2d 363 (1981)) [VERIFY]. | | MAID | Do not imply the agent can request aid-in-dying on the principal's behalf; separate statutory process [VERIFY]. | | Default surrogacy | Reference only client-selected legal chain; do not summarize statutes without attorney verification. | ## Pitfalls **Do:** - Keep language operational: who, when, what threshold, what action. - Preserve client's voice and style. - Use `[placeholder]` for all absent details. - Require attorney review before final use. **Don't:** - Treat this as an enforceable legal order or substitute advance directive. - Include medical advice or treatment guarantees. - Create contradictions with signed legal documents. - Use inflammatory family language that could weaponize disputes. - Advise distribution to clinicians without confirming client disclosure preferences. Attorney review is mandatory. Draft output is informational assistance only and does not constitute legal advice.