---
name: deep-research
description: Conducts enterprise-grade research with multi-source synthesis, citation tracking, and verification. Produces citation-backed reports through a structured pipeline with source credibility scoring, and grounds abstract findings in concrete examples, cases, counterexamples, or mini-scenarios when helpful. Triggers on "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", "analyze trends", or "state of the art". Not for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.
---

# Deep Research

## Core Purpose

Deliver citation-backed, verified research reports through a structured pipeline with source credibility scoring, evidence persistence, and progressive context management.

**Autonomy Principle:** Operate independently. Infer assumptions from context. Only stop for critical errors or incomprehensible queries.

**Accessibility Principle:** Make dense analysis easier to grasp. When a finding is abstract, architectural, process-heavy, or strategically subtle, ground it in a concrete example, mini-case, counterexample, implementation scenario, or failure mode. Prefer real source-grounded cases; if you use an illustrative hypothetical, label it clearly as hypothetical and do not cite it as if it were sourced fact.

---

## Decision Tree

```
Request Analysis
+-- Simple lookup? --> STOP: Use WebSearch
+-- Debugging? --> STOP: Use standard tools
+-- Complex analysis needed? --> CONTINUE

Mode Selection
+-- Initial exploration --> quick (3 phases, 2-5 min)
+-- Standard research --> standard (6 phases, 5-10 min) [DEFAULT]
+-- Critical decision --> deep (8 phases, 10-20 min)
+-- Comprehensive review --> ultradeep (8+ phases, 20-45 min)
```

**Default assumptions:** Technical query = technical audience. Comparison = balanced perspective. Trend = recent 1-2 years.

**Default readability rule:** For Standard mode and above, try to include at least one concrete case/example for each major finding unless the topic is purely numeric, the source material provides no credible case material, or confidentiality/safety considerations make cases inappropriate.

---

## Workflow Overview

| Phase | Name | Quick | Standard | Deep | UltraDeep |
|-------|------|-------|----------|------|-----------|
| 1 | SCOPE | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| 2 | PLAN | - | Y | Y | Y |
| 3 | RETRIEVE | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| 4 | TRIANGULATE | - | Y | Y | Y |
| 4.5 | OUTLINE REFINEMENT | - | Y | Y | Y |
| 5 | SYNTHESIZE | - | Y | Y | Y |
| 6 | CRITIQUE | - | - | Y | Y |
| 7 | REFINE | - | - | Y | Y |
| 8 | PACKAGE | Y | Y | Y | Y |

---

## Execution

**On invocation, load relevant reference files:**

1. **Phase 1-7:** Load [methodology.md](./reference/methodology.md) for detailed phase instructions
2. **Phase 8 (Report):** Load [report-assembly.md](./reference/report-assembly.md) for progressive generation
3. **HTML/PDF output:** Load [html-generation.md](./reference/html-generation.md)
4. **Quality checks:** Load [quality-gates.md](./reference/quality-gates.md)
5. **Long reports (>18K words):** Load [continuation.md](./reference/continuation.md)

**Templates:**
- Report structure: [report_template.md](./templates/report_template.md)
- HTML styling: [mckinsey_report_template.html](./templates/mckinsey_report_template.html)

**Scripts:**
- `python scripts/validate_report.py --report [path]`
- `python scripts/verify_citations.py --report [path]`
- `python scripts/md_to_html.py [markdown_path]`

---

## Output Contract

**Required sections:**
- Executive Summary (200-400 words)
- Introduction (scope, methodology, assumptions)
- Main Analysis (4-8 findings, 600-2,000 words each, cited, each grounded in concrete examples/cases when helpful)
- Synthesis & Insights (patterns, implications)
- Limitations & Caveats
- Recommendations
- Bibliography (COMPLETE - every citation, no placeholders)
- Methodology Appendix

**Output files (all to `~/Documents/[Topic]_Research_[YYYYMMDD]/`):**
- Markdown (primary source)
- HTML (McKinsey style, auto-opened)
- PDF (professional print, auto-opened)

**Quality standards:**
- 10+ sources, 3+ per major claim
- All claims cited immediately [N]
- No placeholders, no fabricated citations
- Prose-first (>=80%), bullets sparingly
- Use concrete examples, mini-cases, counterexamples, or applied scenarios to make major findings easier to understand
- Source-ground real cases when available; clearly label hypothetical illustrative examples instead of citing them as factual evidence

---

## When to Use / NOT Use

**Use:** Comprehensive analysis, technology comparisons, state-of-the-art reviews, multi-perspective investigation, market analysis.

**Do NOT use:** Simple lookups, debugging, 1-2 search answers, quick time-sensitive queries.