---
title: Notes | Tutorial 41
layout: post
date: 2020-09-18 11:00
parent: Tutorial Notes
tutorial_link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxVzxS8uMto
lesson: 41
---

1. TOC
{:toc}

## Since Last Time

* [Hello, and welcome to FI](https://xertrov.github.io/fi/posts/2020-09-18-hello-and-welcome-to-fi/)
* [(Draft/Partial) Helping the Best People or the Masses; One Meaning for FI](https://xertrov.github.io/fi/posts/2020-09-18-helping-the-best-people-or-helping-the-masses-one-meaning-for-fi/)
* Bunch of stuff on curi.us

Minor, or duplicated stuff:

* <https://xertrov.github.io/fi/posts/2020-09-15-a-thought-on-overreaching-and-greatness/>
* <https://xertrov.github.io/fi/posts/2020-09-17-postmortem-on-18030-18043-18050/>
* <https://xertrov.github.io/fi/posts/2020-09-16-perimortem-on-intuitive-response-to-18037/>

> good thing to write about: goals, attainability, what do i plan to do and can i accomplish it, a good position to do it, etc

going to do this in this weeks learning report

## tutorial notes

* sentence 1, generic statement that a lot of ppl claim. ppl filter it out.
  * ppl misinterpret by thinking "most forums" is like bottom 50%
  * doesn't give them important actiontionable ppl
* > It’s rude to criticise someone
  * not point of difference for most ppl, e.g. lesswrong
* > You have to stay on topic
  * ppl think staying on topic is a good thing, accusation against other forums
* (maybe) need to focus on some point of difference that is more evident or something
* ppl don't know how FI is different
  * topic: every conversation is *unbounded*

* on note of philosophy in life, Rand's *philosophy who needs it* chapters 1 and 2

* one thing I notice is I can tell pretty quickly is when I've fooled myself with the quality of what I write. I *didn't* do proper structure and brainstorming before writing *Hello, and welcome to FI*. I thought I had done enough but it falls down really quickly. I have a bad intuition

----