{
  "@context": {
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP100:body",
      "@context": {
        "references": {
          "@id": "CIP100:references",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference",
            "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference",
            "label": "CIP100:reference-label",
            "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri",
            "referenceHash": {
              "@id": "CIP100:referenceHash",
              "@context": {
                "hashDigest": "CIP100:hashDigest",
                "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm"
              }
            }
          }
        },
        "comment": "CIP100:comment",
        "externalUpdates": {
          "@id": "CIP100:externalUpdates",
          "@context": {
            "title": "CIP100:update-title",
            "uri": "CIP100:uri"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set",
      "@context": {
        "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
        "witness": {
          "@id": "CIP100:witness",
          "@context": {
            "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm",
            "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey",
            "signature": "CIP100:signature"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "authors": [],
  "body": {
    "comment": "Summary\nYoroi DRep votes ABSTAIN on \"The first node in the browser; a Cardano USP.\" This position reflects a continuation of our view on node diversity sequencing and is not a judgment on HLabs or the quality of their work.\nRationale\nYoroi acknowledges the effort to resubmit with a narrower scope. \nHLabs has responded to community feedback by separating this proposal from the broader combined request and reducing the budget significantly. That responsiveness is appreciated, and the browser-node concept remains technically compelling for the reasons the proposal articulates well.\n\nOur reservations about TypeScript as a node foundation remain open. \nConversations with developers and engineers in the ecosystem continue to surface questions about whether TypeScript is the right choice for production-grade node infrastructure. We do not hold this view with certainty and remain open to hearing from those who see it differently, but it continues to factor into our position.\n\nThe sequencing question has not materially changed. \nWith Amaru and Dingo already funded and working toward alternative node readiness, the case for a third implementation in the same cycle remains difficult to establish, even accounting for the distinct browser-focused scope of this proposal. Yoroi would find it easier to support Gerolamo in a future cycle once the existing funded efforts have progressed further toward their delivery targets.\n\nConclusion\nYoroi has genuine respect for HLabs and the contributions they continue to make to the Cardano TypeScript ecosystem. Our decision to abstain reflects a considered view on timing and sequencing rather than any objection to the team or the concept. We would welcome a future proposal once the broader node diversity landscape has had time to mature and would hope to be in a position to support it at that point.\n"
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256"
}