{
  "@context": {
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP100:body",
      "@context": {
        "references": {
          "@id": "CIP100:references",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference",
            "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference",
            "label": "CIP100:reference-label",
            "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri",
            "referenceHash": {
              "@id": "CIP100:referenceHash",
              "@context": {
                "hashDigest": "CIP100:hashDigest",
                "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm"
              }
            }
          }
        },
        "comment": "CIP100:comment",
        "externalUpdates": {
          "@id": "CIP100:externalUpdates",
          "@context": {
            "title": "CIP100:update-title",
            "uri": "CIP100:uri"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set",
      "@context": {
        "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
        "witness": {
          "@id": "CIP100:witness",
          "@context": {
            "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm",
            "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey",
            "signature": "CIP100:signature"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "authors": [],
  "body": {
    "comment": "Summary\nYoroi DRep votes ABSTAIN on Tweag Core Cardano Infrastructure: Treasury Withdrawal 2026-2028. While Yoroi has confidence in Tweag's technical expertise and track record, the scale and structure of this request warrant a more measured approach before full endorsement.\nRationale\nTweag's track record and the importance of this work are not in question. The focus on Peras mainnet delivery, conformance testing, and node observability addresses areas the ecosystem genuinely needs, and Tweag has the institutional knowledge to deliver them. Yoroi does not take lightly the risk of disrupting continuity on work of this criticality.\n\nA two-year, 39.79M ADA commitment requires stronger annual accountability gates. \nThe proposal bundles 17 work packages across a broad scope into a single funding action, with the full two-year amount requested upfront. For a commitment of this magnitude, Yoroi believes the community deserves clearer year-by-year milestones and a structure that allows the second year's funding to be contingent on verified first-year delivery.\n\nA phased submission would be easier to support. \nSplitting the proposal into annual tranches would preserve the continuity of the work while providing the governance oversight that a request of this scale warrants. Yoroi would be in a significantly stronger position to vote YES on a first-year proposal with a clearly defined scope and a commitment to return for the second year upon delivery.\n\nConclusion\nYoroi respects the depth of Tweag's contribution to Cardano's infrastructure and the importance of the work outlined in this proposal. Our abstain is not a rejection of the team or the programme, but a considered view that a commitment of this scale deserves a more structured approach to community oversight. We would encourage a resubmission structured around annual tranches and look forward to supporting that work through the governance process.\n"
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256"
}