# `nature-writing` skill A Nature-style manuscript writing skill for drafting or rebuilding sections from author-provided claims, figures, results, notes, or Chinese drafts. ## What it does `nature-writing` helps write: - titles - abstracts - introductions - results narratives - discussions - conclusions - significance paragraphs - manuscript outlines It is for argument construction and section drafting. For sentence-level polish of an existing draft, use `nature-polishing`. ## Built from Close reading of curated Nature and Nature Communications research articles across materials, energy systems, construction decarbonization and machine learning, combined with the existing writing-strategy rules in this repository. Section-level writing and reviewer-facing self-review guidance is also adapted from Prof. Peng Sida's open research-writing notes: - https://pengsida.notion.site/c1a22465a0fa4b15a12985223916048e - https://github.com/pengsida/learning_research ## File structure ```text nature-writing/ ├── README.md ├── SKILL.md └── references/ ├── abstract.md ├── article-architecture.md ├── chinese-author-workflow.md ├── conclusion.md ├── experiments.md ├── introduction.md ├── method.md ├── paper-review.md ├── paragraph-flow.md ├── related-work.md └── examples/ ``` ## Key rules | Domain | Core rule | |---|---| | Evidence first | Do not invent data, mechanisms, statistics, sample sizes or novelty | | Abstract | Context, gap, approach, key result, implication, boundary | | Introduction | Field scale, bottleneck, prior attempts, unresolved gap, present study | | Method | Explain module motivation, design, forward process, and technical advantage | | Results | Build an evidence ladder, not a chronological lab diary | | Experiments | Tie every major claim to comparison, ablation, metric, or stress-test evidence | | Discussion | Explain meaning, prior-work relation, constraints and future use | | Review | Run adversarial self-review before submission | | Chinese notes | Translate intent and argument, not clause order |