---
name: life-os-relationship-review
description: >-
  Surface important personal relationships that may need attention using explicit commitments, recent communication patterns, meaningful dates, and Aren's stated priorities, then suggest or draft considerate follow-ups. Use for "who should I follow up with", "relationship review", "who have I gone quiet with", or the relationship section of a weekly review. Do not equate message frequency with relationship quality or contact anyone automatically.
---

# Life OS Relationship Review

Support relationships without reducing people to engagement metrics.

Read `../../runtime/references/workflow-contract.md` before acting.

## Step 1 — gather bounded signals

Use open commitments, recent Gmail/iMessage interaction metadata, person notes, important dates, and Aren's explicitly stated relationship priorities. Do not expose one person's private information in another context.

## Step 2 — identify useful attention

Prioritize explicit promises, time-sensitive life events, unresolved questions, and relationships Aren has chosen to maintain. A quiet period alone is a weak signal. State why each person surfaced and the confidence.

## Step 3 — suggest, then draft

Offer a small list with a genuine reason to reach out. Draft in the appropriate voice only when useful. Never manufacture intimacy, pretend knowledge Aren does not have, or create a commitment he did not choose.

Every proactive contact and send requires confirmation. A recipient whitelist may relax future sends only after Aren explicitly creates it; this skill never invents one.

## Output

Use: person, why now, evidence/source, suggested action, and draft status. Do not rank people by worth or publish raw communication content.