# Optimization Patterns
Worked fixes for the anti-patterns named in Step 3 of the `performance-optimization` skill. The skill states the rule and the signature to look for; this file shows one concrete implementation. Open the section you need after Step 2 has identified the bottleneck — it is not meant to be read top to bottom.
Checklists, measurement commands, TTFB diagnosis, and caching read/write strategies live in `../../../references/performance-checklist.md`.
## N+1 Queries (Backend)
```typescript
// BAD: N+1 — one query per task for the owner
const tasks = await db.tasks.findMany();
for (const task of tasks) {
task.owner = await db.users.findUnique({ where: { id: task.ownerId } });
}
// GOOD: Single query with join/include
const tasks = await db.tasks.findMany({
include: { owner: true },
});
```
## Unbounded Data Fetching
```typescript
// BAD: Fetching all records
const allTasks = await db.tasks.findMany();
// GOOD: Paginated with limits
const tasks = await db.tasks.findMany({
take: 20,
skip: (page - 1) * 20,
orderBy: { createdAt: 'desc' },
});
```
## Queries That Ignore Their Index
"Add an index" is the guess. The query plan is the measurement:
```sql
EXPLAIN ANALYZE
SELECT id, title FROM tasks
WHERE owner_id = 42 ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT 20;
```
Three things in the output decide the fix:
| What you see | What it means |
|---|---|
| `Seq Scan` on a large table where you expected an index | No usable index for this predicate |
| Estimated `rows=` off from actual by an order of magnitude | Stale statistics; the planner is choosing on bad information |
| A `Sort` node above the scan | The index covers the filter but not the `ORDER BY` |
Index for the **shape of the query**, not the column in isolation. In a composite index, equality columns come first, then the range or sort column:
```sql
CREATE INDEX idx_tasks_owner_created ON tasks (owner_id, created_at DESC);
```
**When an index will not help:**
| Situation | Why |
|---|---|
| Low selectivity, querying the dominant value (a `status` column that is 95% `active`, filtered on `active`) | A sequential scan is genuinely cheaper; the planner will ignore the index. Filtering on the rare value is the opposite case, and a partial index serves it well |
| Leading wildcard (`LIKE '%term'`) | A B-tree cannot seek without a prefix; needs trigram or full-text |
| Function on the column (`WHERE lower(email) = ?`) | The plain column index is unusable; index the expression instead |
| Write-heavy table | Every index is a tax on every `INSERT`/`UPDATE`; measure the write cost, not just the read gain |
Re-run `EXPLAIN ANALYZE` after. An index that did not change the plan is a revert (Step 4), and it is not free: it still costs on every write.
## Connection Pool Exhaustion
The signature is distinctive: **every** endpoint slows at once, the slow time is spent waiting for a connection rather than executing, and the database reports mostly idle sessions.
```typescript
// BAD: a pool per request or per module — under serverless this multiplies
// by instance count and exhausts the database's connection limit
// GOOD: one pool per process, sized against the database's ceiling
const pool = new Pool({
max: 10, // instances × max must stay under max_connections
idleTimeoutMillis: 30_000,
connectionTimeoutMillis: 5_000, // fail fast instead of queueing forever
});
```
**Bigger is not faster.** A pool larger than what the database can execute concurrently just relocates the queue from your app to the database, where it is harder to see. When instance count is unbounded (serverless, autoscaling), a proxy that multiplexes connections (pgbouncer, RDS Proxy) is the fix, not a higher `max`.
## Missing Image Optimization (Frontend)
```html
```
## Unnecessary Re-renders (React)
```tsx
// BAD: Creates new object on every render, causing children to re-render
function TaskList() {
return