{ "cells": [ { "cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [ "
Given an array nums containing n distinct numbers in the range [0, n], return the only number in the range that is missing from the array.
\n", "
Example 1:
\n", "\n", "Input: nums = [3,0,1]\n",
"Output: 2\n",
"Explanation: n = 3 since there are 3 numbers, so all numbers are in the range [0,3]. 2 is the missing number in the range since it does not appear in nums.\n",
"\n",
"\n",
"Example 2:
\n", "\n", "Input: nums = [0,1]\n",
"Output: 2\n",
"Explanation: n = 2 since there are 2 numbers, so all numbers are in the range [0,2]. 2 is the missing number in the range since it does not appear in nums.\n",
"\n",
"\n",
"Example 3:
\n", "\n", "Input: nums = [9,6,4,2,3,5,7,0,1]\n",
"Output: 8\n",
"Explanation: n = 9 since there are 9 numbers, so all numbers are in the range [0,9]. 8 is the missing number in the range since it does not appear in nums.\n",
"\n",
"\n",
"Example 4:
\n", "\n", "Input: nums = [0]\n",
"Output: 1\n",
"Explanation: n = 1 since there is 1 number, so all numbers are in the range [0,1]. 1 is the missing number in the range since it does not appear in nums.\n",
"\n",
"\n",
"\n", "
Constraints:
\n", "\n", "n == nums.length1 <= n <= 1040 <= nums[i] <= nnums are unique.\n", "Source \n", "
Could you implement a solution using only O(1) extra space complexity and O(n) runtime complexity?