--- name: foundations-market-intelligence description: Market analysis and competitive intelligence for startups. Use when analyzing market opportunities, sizing TAM, profiling segments, or mapping competition. --- # Market Intelligence Agent ## Overview The Market Intelligence Agent provides comprehensive market analysis for startup decision-making. This agent merges four specialized capabilities: Context Mapping, Opportunity Evaluation, Segment Profiling, and Competitor Intelligence into a unified workflow that produces actionable market insights. **Primary Use Cases**: Market discovery, TAM/SAM/SOM analysis, competitive assessment, customer segmentation, opportunity scoring, market timing evaluation. **Lifecycle Phases**: Discovery (primary), quarterly reviews, major pivots, expansion planning. ## Core Functions ### 1. Market Sizing & Segmentation Calculate addressable market using rigorous bottom-up and top-down methodologies. **Workflow**: 1. **Define Market Boundaries** - Establish geographic scope (countries, regions, cities) - Identify industry vertical(s) and sub-segments - Clarify product/service category definition 2. **Calculate TAM (Total Addressable Market)** - **Top-Down Method**: Industry reports × applicable percentage - **Bottom-Up Method**: Target customer count × average revenue per customer × adoption rate - **Value Theory Method**: Problem cost × affected population × solution value capture - Cross-validate all three methods; use conservative estimates 3. **Calculate SAM (Serviceable Addressable Market)** - Apply geographic constraints - Apply channel access limitations - Apply regulatory or compliance filters - SAM = TAM × (serviceable percentage) 4. **Calculate SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market)** - Assess realistic market share in 1-3 years - Factor in competitive intensity - Account for GTM capacity constraints - SOM = SAM × (obtainable market share %) 5. **Segment the Market** - **Demographic Segmentation**: Age, income, company size, industry - **Psychographic Segmentation**: Values, attitudes, lifestyle, culture - **Jobs-to-be-Done Segmentation**: Functional jobs, emotional jobs, social jobs - Identify 3-5 distinct segments with unique characteristics 6. **Validate Segment Viability** - **Willingness to Pay**: Evidence of budget allocation for similar solutions - **Urgency Score**: How critical is solving this problem (1-5 scale) - **Accessible Channels**: Can you reach this segment cost-effectively? - Rank segments by: size × urgency × accessibility **Output Template**: ``` Market Size Analysis ├── TAM: $XXM - $XXXM (methodology: top-down + bottom-up) ├── SAM: $XXM - $XXM (X% of TAM, constraints: geography, channels) ├── SOM (Year 1-3): $XM - $XXM (X% market share assumption) └── Confidence Level: High/Medium/Low (rationale) Top 3 Segments (prioritized): 1. [Segment Name] - Size: X customers / $XXM market - Pain Severity: X/5 - Urgency: X/5 - Accessibility: [channels] - Willingness to Pay: $X-$X per [unit] 2. [Segment Name]... 3. [Segment Name]... Penetration Strategy: - Entry segment: [Segment 1] - Expansion path: [Segment 1] → [Segment 2] → [Segment 3] - Rationale: [why this sequence] ``` ### 2. Competitive Analysis Map the competitive landscape to identify differentiation opportunities and strategic positioning. **Workflow**: 1. **Identify Competitors** - **Direct Competitors**: Same solution, same target customer - **Indirect Competitors**: Different solution, same job-to-be-done - **Future Threats**: Adjacent players who could enter, tech disruption - Limit to top 5 most relevant competitors for focus 2. **Analyze Competitive Positioning** - Value proposition and messaging - Target customer segments - Pricing strategy and business model - Brand perception and market position 3. **Map Feature Gaps** - Core features they offer - Notable omissions or weaknesses - User complaints and pain points (review mining) - Technical limitations or debt 4. **Assess Go-to-Market Strategies** - Primary acquisition channels - Sales model (self-serve, sales-led, hybrid) - Partnership ecosystem - Content and thought leadership 5. **Track Strategic Activity** - Recent funding rounds and amounts - Product releases and roadmap signals - Pricing changes and promotional tactics - Acquisitions, partnerships, leadership changes 6. **Identify Differentiation Opportunities** - Unserved or underserved segments - Feature gaps with high customer demand - Business model innovations (pricing, packaging) - Channel or GTM advantages **Output Template**: ``` Competitive Matrix | Competitor | Positioning | Strengths | Weaknesses | Pricing | Funding | |------------|-------------|-----------|------------|---------|---------| | [Name 1] | [1 line] | [3 max] | [3 max] | $X/mo | $XM | | [Name 2] | [1 line] | [3 max] | [3 max] | $X/mo | $XM | | ... | | | | | | Differentiation Opportunities: 1. [Opportunity]: [Description + rationale] 2. [Opportunity]: [Description + rationale] 3. [Opportunity]: [Description + rationale] Competitive Threats: - Immediate: [threat + mitigation strategy] - Medium-term: [threat + monitoring plan] - Long-term: [threat + strategic positioning] Recommended Positioning: [1-2 sentences describing unique strategic position] ``` ### 3. Customer Intelligence Deep research into target customer problems, buying behavior, and decision criteria. **Workflow**: 1. **Research Pain Points** - **Primary Research**: Customer interviews (minimum 10-15 for validity) - **Secondary Research**: Reviews, forums, support tickets, social media - **Jobs-to-be-Done Analysis**: Functional, emotional, and social jobs - Quantify: frequency, severity, current workarounds 2. **Define Ideal Customer Profile (ICP)** - **Firmographics** (B2B): Company size, industry, revenue, growth stage - **Demographics** (B2C): Age, income, location, education, occupation - **Behavioral**: Tech adoption curve, buying triggers, budget authority - **Psychographic**: Values, motivations, fears, aspirations 3. **Create Personas** - 2-3 primary personas (avoid over-proliferation) - Include: role, goals, challenges, information sources, objections - Map buying journey: awareness → consideration → decision → retention - Define anti-personas (who NOT to target) 4. **Quantify Problem & Solution Value** - **Problem Severity**: Cost of status quo (time, money, opportunity cost) - **Solution Value**: ROI or value delivery in measurable terms - **Switching Costs**: Effort required to adopt (time, training, migration) - Calculate value-to-cost ratio for prioritization 5. **Map Buying Process** - Decision-maker vs. influencers vs. users - Evaluation criteria and deal-breakers - Typical sales cycle length - Budget cycles and procurement processes **Output Template**: ``` Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) [B2B Example] ├── Company Size: X-X employees ├── Revenue: $XM-$XM ARR ├── Industry: [primary], [secondary] ├── Growth Stage: [seed/series A/B/growth] ├── Tech Stack: [key technologies] └── Buying Authority: [role/title] Primary Persona: [Name/Title] ├── Goals: [3 key objectives] ├── Challenges: [3 main pain points] ├── Daily Context: [typical day/workflow] ├── Information Sources: [where they learn] ├── Objections: [typical concerns] └── Success Metrics: [how they measure results] Anti-Persona: [Who NOT to target] - [Profile]: [reason to avoid] Customer Acquisition Strategy: ├── Entry Point: [specific pain point to lead with] ├── Value Proof: [how to demonstrate value quickly] ├── Buying Triggers: [events that create urgency] └── First Purchase: [initial offering to convert] Problem-Solution Economics: ├── Annual Cost of Problem: $X per customer ├── Solution Value Delivery: $X per customer per year ├── Value-to-Price Ratio: Xx (target: >10x for early stage) └── Payback Period: X months ``` ### 4. Market Dynamics Assess market growth, trends, and timing to evaluate entry strategy and readiness. **Workflow**: 1. **Assess Market Growth** - Historical growth rate (CAGR) over 3-5 years - Projected growth rate for next 3-5 years - Identify growth drivers and constraints - Evaluate if market is expanding, mature, or contracting 2. **Identify Consolidation Trends** - M&A activity in the space - Market concentration (few large players vs. fragmented) - Platform dynamics and winner-take-most effects - Network effects and defensibility patterns 3. **Detect Disruption Signals** - Technology enablers (new tech making new solutions possible) - Regulatory shifts (new laws, compliance requirements) - Cultural changes (shifting behaviors, values, preferences) - Economic factors (recession, inflation, disposable income) 4. **Evaluate Market Readiness** - **Too Early**: Education required, infrastructure missing, budget unavailable - **Right Time**: Awareness exists, budget allocated, infrastructure ready - **Too Late**: Incumbents entrenched, commoditization underway - Map adoption curve: innovators → early adopters → early majority → late majority 5. **Assess Category Creation vs. Category Entry** - **Category Creation**: Educate market, higher risk, potential for category leadership - **Category Entry**: Leverage existing demand, lower risk, compete on differentiation - Determine positioning strategy accordingly **Output Template**: ``` Market Dynamics Assessment Growth Profile: ├── Historical CAGR: X% (20XX-20XX) ├── Projected CAGR: X% (20XX-20XX) ├── Growth Stage: [emerging/growth/mature/declining] └── Growth Drivers: [3 key factors] Market Structure: ├── Concentration: [fragmented/consolidating/oligopoly] ├── Recent M&A: [X acquisitions in past 2 years] ├── Market Leader Share: X% └── Defensibility: [network effects/switching costs/brand/other] Disruption Signals: ├── Technology: [enabling technology shifts] ├── Regulatory: [policy changes affecting market] ├── Cultural: [behavioral or preference shifts] └── Economic: [macro factors] Market Timing Assessment: ├── Timing Score: X/100 ├── Adoption Phase: [innovators/early adopters/early majority/late majority] ├── Market Readiness: [too early/right time/too late] └── Rationale: [2-3 sentences] Entry Strategy: ├── Approach: [category creation/category entry] ├── Positioning: [how to frame the solution] ├── Education Required: [low/medium/high] └── Timing Recommendation: [now/wait X months/conditions to meet] ``` ### 5. Opportunity Scoring Synthesize all intelligence into a comprehensive go/no-go recommendation. **Workflow**: 1. **Evaluate Market Attractiveness** - Market size and growth rate (weight: 30%) - Willingness to pay and unit economics (weight: 25%) - Accessibility and competition level (weight: 20%) - Strategic importance and future optionality (weight: 15%) - Market timing and momentum (weight: 10%) 2. **Assess Competitive Intensity** - Number and strength of incumbents - Barriers to entry (capital, regulation, network effects) - Differentiation potential (can you be 10x better?) - Competitive response likelihood and speed 3. **Evaluate Execution Fit** - Team expertise and domain knowledge - Resource requirements vs. availability - Time to market and burn rate implications - Strategic alignment with company vision 4. **Risk Assessment** - **Market Risks**: Market smaller than estimated, adoption slower than expected - **Timing Risks**: Too early (education costs), too late (incumbents entrenched) - **Competitive Risks**: Well-funded competitor launches, price wars - **Execution Risks**: Technical complexity, regulatory hurdles, talent availability 5. **Prioritize Opportunities** - **By ROI Potential**: Expected return vs. investment required - **By Strategic Value**: Long-term positioning, optionality, learning value - **By Speed**: Time to first revenue, time to validation 6. **Generate Recommendation** - Go/No-Go decision with confidence level (%) - Key assumptions and validation experiments - Next 3 immediate actions to de-risk or capitalize **Output Template**: ``` Opportunity Scoring Summary Overall Score: XX/100 (Recommendation: GO / NO-GO / INVESTIGATE FURTHER) Component Scores: ├── Market Attractiveness: XX/100 (weight: 30%) │ ├── Size & Growth: X/25 │ ├── Economics: X/25 │ ├── Accessibility: X/25 │ └── Timing: X/25 ├── Competitive Position: XX/100 (weight: 35%) │ ├── Differentiation Potential: X/35 │ ├── Barriers to Entry: X/35 │ └── Competitive Intensity: X/30 └── Execution Fit: XX/100 (weight: 35%) ├── Team/Expertise: X/35 ├── Resources Available: X/35 └── Strategic Alignment: X/30 Risk Assessment: ├── CRITICAL RISKS (kill if not mitigated): │ - [Risk]: [Mitigation approach] ├── HIGH RISKS (monitor closely): │ - [Risk]: [Mitigation approach] └── MEDIUM RISKS (acceptable): - [Risk]: [Mitigation approach] Key Assumptions to Validate: 1. [Assumption]: [Validation method] 2. [Assumption]: [Validation method] 3. [Assumption]: [Validation method] Recommended Next Actions: 1. [Action]: [Expected outcome + timeline] 2. [Action]: [Expected outcome + timeline] 3. [Action]: [Expected outcome + timeline] Confidence Level: X% (rationale: [1-2 sentences]) ``` ## Input Requirements To perform comprehensive market intelligence analysis, provide: **Required**: - `product_idea`: Brief description (1-2 sentences) of what you're building - `target_geography`: List of countries/regions to analyze - `industry_vertical`: Primary industry or category **Optional**: - `initial_hypothesis`: Your assumptions about market, customer, competition - `constraints`: Budget, timeline, team size limitations - `strategic_context`: Company goals, pivoting from what, expansion plans **Example Input**: ``` product_idea: "AI-powered beauty product recommendations based on skin analysis and personal preferences" target_geography: ["United States", "Canada"] industry_vertical: "Beauty & Personal Care - Digital/D2C" initial_hypothesis: { "target_customer": "Women 25-40, digitally native, skincare enthusiasts", "willingness_to_pay": "$15-30/month subscription", "main_competitor": "Sephora's Color IQ, Function of Beauty" } ``` ## Output Structure All market intelligence analysis follows this standardized format: ```json { "market_size": { "TAM": 5000000000, "SAM": 1200000000, "SOM": 24000000, "confidence": "medium", "methodology": "bottom-up + top-down validated" }, "top_segments": [ { "name": "Skincare Enthusiasts (25-40)", "size": 12000000, "pain_severity": 4, "urgency": 3, "accessibility": "high", "willingness_to_pay": "$20-35/month" }, { "name": "Beauty Novices Seeking Guidance", "size": 8500000, "pain_severity": 3, "urgency": 2, "accessibility": "medium", "willingness_to_pay": "$10-20/month" }, { "name": "Professional MUAs & Estheticians", "size": 450000, "pain_severity": 5, "urgency": 4, "accessibility": "medium", "willingness_to_pay": "$50-100/month" } ], "competitors": [ { "name": "Function of Beauty", "positioning": "Personalized haircare via quiz", "strengths": ["Strong brand", "Proven unit economics", "Wide distribution"], "gaps": ["Limited to hair", "No AI/skin analysis", "High price point"], "pricing": "$30-50/month", "funding": "$150M Series C" } ], "market_timing": { "score": 78, "rationale": "AI beauty tech awareness high post-2023, but market not saturated. Early majority adoption phase. Strong timing.", "recommendation": "Enter now" }, "next_actions": [ "Validate willingness-to-pay with 20 customer interviews in primary segment", "Build competitive feature matrix and identify 3 key differentiation points", "Run micro-landing page test to validate demand ($500 budget, 2 weeks)" ] } ``` ## Integration with Other Agents ### Provides Input To: **problem-solution-fit**: Market insights inform which problems to prioritize - Segment profiles → Problem validation focus areas - Competitive gaps → Solution differentiation requirements **value-proposition**: Market positioning informs value articulation - Top segments → Target customer definition - Competitive analysis → Differentiation messaging **business-model**: Market economics drive business model design - Willingness to pay → Pricing strategy - Market size → Revenue projections **go-to-market**: Market intelligence shapes channel strategy - Customer profiles → Channel selection - Competitive dynamics → Launch timing and positioning ### Receives Input From: **validation**: Experiment results refine market assumptions - Validated hypotheses → Update market sizing - Customer feedback → Refine segment profiles **execution**: Actual user data improves intelligence accuracy - User demographics → Validate ICP accuracy - Pricing tests → Refine willingness-to-pay estimates ## Best Practices ### For Accurate Market Sizing 1. **Always Use Multiple Methods**: Cross-validate TAM with top-down AND bottom-up 2. **Be Conservative**: When in doubt, use lower estimates (better to exceed than miss) 3. **Document Assumptions**: Every number should have a source and calculation method 4. **Update Regularly**: Market intelligence degrades; refresh quarterly at minimum ### For Competitive Analysis 1. **Focus on Top 5**: More competitors = diluted insights, focus on most relevant 2. **Mine User Reviews**: G2, Capterra, App Store reviews reveal true strengths/weaknesses 3. **Track Changes**: Set Google Alerts, monitor product releases, pricing changes 4. **Look Beyond Features**: Business model, GTM, and positioning matter more than features ### For Customer Intelligence 1. **Talk to Customers**: No amount of desk research replaces 15 real conversations 2. **Seek Disconfirming Evidence**: Actively look for data that contradicts your hypothesis 3. **Quantify Everything**: "Customers want X" is weak; "73% rated X as critical" is strong 4. **Identify Anti-Personas**: Knowing who NOT to target is as valuable as ICP ### For Market Timing 1. **Look for Inflection Points**: Technology shifts, regulatory changes, cultural moments 2. **Assess Education Required**: High education cost = wait or plan for slow adoption 3. **Monitor Adjacent Markets**: What's happening in related industries signals future trends 4. **Balance First-Mover vs. Fast-Follower**: Being first isn't always winning ## Common Pitfalls to Avoid **Market Sizing Errors**: - ❌ Using TAM as if it's achievable (confusing TAM with SOM) - ❌ Top-down only (leads to inflated estimates) - ❌ Not accounting for accessibility constraints - ✅ Conservative, multi-method validation with clear assumptions **Competitive Analysis Errors**: - ❌ Analyzing too many competitors (lose focus) - ❌ Focusing only on direct competitors (miss disruption from adjacent spaces) - ❌ Assuming competitors are static (they will respond) - ✅ Focus on top 5, include indirect and future threats, plan for responses **Customer Intelligence Errors**: - ❌ Talking only to early adopters (they're not representative) - ❌ Asking "would you buy this?" (leads to false positives) - ❌ Creating too many personas (analysis paralysis) - ✅ Talk to mainstream buyers, observe behavior, focus on 2-3 personas **Market Timing Errors**: - ❌ Assuming "inevitable" means "imminent" (timing is everything) - ❌ Ignoring category creation costs (education is expensive) - ❌ Missing regulatory or infrastructure dependencies - ✅ Assess readiness realistically, plan for education costs, validate timing assumptions ## Usage Examples ### Example 1: Discovery Phase - New Market Entry **User Request**: "Analyze the market for AI-powered personal finance coaching for Gen Z" **Agent Process**: 1. Market Sizing: TAM/SAM/SOM for Gen Z (18-27) in US personal finance coaching 2. Segmentation: Students, early career, gig workers, crypto-natives 3. Competitive Analysis: Mint, YNAB, Betterment, Copilot, traditional advisors 4. Customer Intelligence: Gen Z money anxieties, digital-first preferences, trust factors 5. Market Dynamics: Shift from budgeting tools to coaching, AI personalization trend 6. Opportunity Score: 72/100 - GO with caveats on willingness-to-pay validation **Output**: Complete market intelligence report with recommended entry segment and next 3 actions ### Example 2: Quarterly Review - Market Evolution **User Request**: "Update our market intelligence - we launched 6 months ago, seeing traction in enterprise segment" **Agent Process**: 1. Refresh competitive analysis: New entrants, competitive responses 2. Validate segment hypotheses: Did enterprise match projections? 3. Update market sizing: Based on actual conversion data 4. Identify new opportunities: Adjacent segments, expansion markets 5. Assess competitive threats: Who's moving into your space? **Output**: Updated market intelligence focusing on changes and new opportunities ### Example 3: Pivot Decision - Alternative Market **User Request**: "We're struggling in B2C, should we pivot to B2B SaaS?" **Agent Process**: 1. Analyze B2B market: Size, growth, competition 2. Compare markets: B2C vs B2B opportunity scoring 3. Assess execution fit: Does team have B2B GTM expertise? 4. Risk analysis: Pivot risks vs. stay-the-course risks 5. Generate recommendation: GO/NO-GO with confidence level **Output**: Comparative market analysis with pivot recommendation and de-risking actions ## Success Metrics Track these metrics to ensure market intelligence effectiveness: **Accuracy**: How often do market size estimates match reality? (Target: ±30%) **Usefulness**: Do other agents use this intelligence in their work? (Target: >80% utilization) **Freshness**: How often is intelligence updated? (Target: Quarterly minimum) **Action Orientation**: Do intelligence reports lead to clear next actions? (Target: 100%) ## Quarterly Review Checklist Run this checklist every quarter to keep intelligence current: - [ ] Update TAM/SAM/SOM based on latest industry data - [ ] Refresh competitive matrix: new entrants, exits, pivots - [ ] Validate ICP accuracy against actual customer data - [ ] Reassess market timing and growth trajectory - [ ] Update opportunity score based on new information - [ ] Identify 3 new opportunities or threats - [ ] Generate updated next actions for upcoming quarter --- This agent transforms raw market data into strategic intelligence, enabling informed decisions about market entry, positioning, and resource allocation.