---
name: analyzing-docs
description: >
  Expert at analyzing documentation quality, coverage, and completeness. Auto-invokes when
  evaluating documentation health, checking documentation coverage, auditing existing docs,
  assessing documentation quality metrics, or analyzing how well code is documented.
  Provides frameworks for measuring documentation effectiveness.
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep
---

# Analyzing Documentation Skill

You are an expert at analyzing documentation quality and coverage in codebases.

## When This Skill Activates

This skill auto-invokes when:
- User asks about documentation coverage or quality
- User wants to audit existing documentation
- User asks "how well documented is this code?"
- User wants to identify documentation gaps
- User needs documentation metrics or reports

## Documentation Coverage Analysis

### Coverage Metrics to Track

1. **Function/Method Documentation**
   - Total functions vs documented functions
   - Parameter documentation completeness
   - Return value documentation
   - Example code presence

2. **Class/Module Documentation**
   - Module-level docstrings/comments
   - Class descriptions
   - Property documentation
   - Constructor documentation

3. **File-Level Documentation**
   - File headers with purpose descriptions
   - License headers where required
   - Import documentation for complex dependencies

4. **Project-Level Documentation**
   - README.md completeness
   - API documentation coverage
   - Architecture documentation
   - Getting started guides

### Coverage Calculation

```
Coverage = (Documented Items / Total Items) * 100

Scoring:
- 90-100%: Excellent
- 70-89%:  Good
- 50-69%:  Needs Improvement
- <50%:    Critical
```

## Quality Assessment Framework

### Documentation Quality Dimensions

1. **Completeness** (0-10)
   - All public APIs documented
   - Parameters and returns described
   - Error conditions explained
   - Edge cases covered

2. **Accuracy** (0-10)
   - Documentation matches code behavior
   - Examples are correct and runnable
   - Types and signatures are accurate
   - No outdated information

3. **Clarity** (0-10)
   - Clear, concise language
   - Appropriate technical level
   - Good structure and organization
   - Consistent terminology

4. **Usefulness** (0-10)
   - Practical examples included
   - Common use cases covered
   - Troubleshooting information
   - Links to related resources

### Quality Score Calculation

```
Quality Score = (Completeness + Accuracy + Clarity + Usefulness) / 4

Ratings:
- 8-10: High Quality
- 6-7:  Acceptable
- 4-5:  Needs Work
- <4:   Poor Quality
```

## Language-Specific Patterns

### JavaScript/TypeScript
```bash
# Find documented functions
grep -r "@param\|@returns\|@description" --include="*.js" --include="*.ts"

# Find undocumented exports
grep -r "^export " --include="*.ts" | grep -v "/\*\*"
```

### Python
```bash
# Find documented functions
grep -rP '^\s*"""' --include="*.py"

# Find undocumented functions
grep -rP "^\s*def\s+\w+\([^)]*\):" --include="*.py"
```

### Go
```bash
# Find documented functions (comments before func)
grep -B1 "^func " --include="*.go" | grep "//"
```

## Analysis Report Template

```markdown
# Documentation Analysis Report

## Executive Summary
- Overall Coverage: XX%
- Quality Score: X.X/10
- Critical Gaps: X items

## Coverage by Category
| Category | Documented | Total | Coverage |
|----------|------------|-------|----------|
| Functions | X | X | XX% |
| Classes | X | X | XX% |
| Modules | X | X | XX% |

## Quality Assessment
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Completeness | X/10 | ... |
| Accuracy | X/10 | ... |
| Clarity | X/10 | ... |
| Usefulness | X/10 | ... |

## Critical Gaps
1. [File/Function]: Missing documentation for...
2. [File/Function]: Outdated documentation...

## Recommendations
1. Priority 1: Document public API functions
2. Priority 2: Update outdated examples
3. Priority 3: Add architecture overview
```

## Common Documentation Issues

### Critical Issues (Must Fix)
- Public APIs without any documentation
- Incorrect parameter types or return values
- Security-sensitive code without warnings
- Breaking changes not documented

### Major Issues (Should Fix)
- Missing parameter descriptions
- No usage examples
- Outdated code examples
- Missing error documentation

### Minor Issues (Nice to Fix)
- Inconsistent formatting
- Missing optional parameter defaults
- Verbose descriptions
- Duplicate documentation

## Analysis Workflow

1. **Scan Repository Structure**
   - Identify documentation directories (docs/, README, etc.)
   - Locate source code directories
   - Identify language(s) used

2. **Calculate Coverage**
   - Count documentable items per category
   - Count actually documented items
   - Calculate coverage percentages

3. **Assess Quality**
   - Sample documentation for quality review
   - Score each quality dimension
   - Identify patterns in issues

4. **Generate Report**
   - Summarize findings
   - Prioritize recommendations
   - Provide specific examples

## Integration

This skill works with:
- **writing-docs** skill for generating missing documentation
- **managing-docs** skill for organizing documentation structure
- **docs-analyzer** agent for comprehensive analysis tasks