SAP Community - ABAP Cloud

GOS Attachment in RAP Object Page

2026-02-25T14:42:50.825000+01:00

I have a requirement to display attachments, attached to GOS in Purchase Order Business Object.

Need to retrieve attachments from GOS and display in RAP application and have a clickable link which will display or download the attachment.

Is it possible or not using RAP managed or Unmanaged?

S/4HANA Public Cloud Adobe Forms: How to Control Line Item Layout Using a Header Flag?

2026-02-27T11:30:38.047000+01:00

Hi Experts,

I am working on an SAP Adobe Form in S/4HANA Public Cloud. A custom header-level flag field is sent from ABAP and correctly bound to a header field, and the value prints correctly in the PDF output. This flag is used in JavaScript (calculate event) on a repeating line-item subform to control line-item layout behaviour such as visibility or page breaks, based on the current line-item index. The script is placed on a subform.

The logic works correctly in Adobe LiveCycle Designer (ADLC) preview, but after uploading the form and executing it in SAP runtime via transaction code, the conditions do not work. The flag value is available and prints correctly, no JavaScript errors occur, but the line-item layout changes are ignored.

What is the correct SAP-supported way to control line-item layout based on a header-level flag in Adobe Forms in S/4HANA Public Cloud?

Thank you.

ATC Check Error: "Program does not exist"

2026-02-27T23:46:27.026000+01:00

Hello - need help understanding some ATC check errors.

We our testing out some source code of ours developed in our SAP Public Cloud instance which we then imported via gCTS to our S4 2025 on-premise system.

We ran the ABAP_CC_CERTIFICATION ATC check variant for clean clore compatability. However, we have ran into a few errors with object type WAPA .

It looks like it points to the BSP application object. We have a few of these for our Fiori Applications.

We went ahead and re-deployed directly to the on-premise system and the errors cleared. However, when we imported to another on-prem test system, the ATC check errors came back again. Did some more digging, and found that the cryptic "CL_XXXXXX" class maps back to the INDEX.HTML page of the BSP Application.

I think what is happening is that the controller class in question is generated during deployment runtime and thus are not actually tagged to a transport, and I don't think it can be. So when we import, the class does not exist and thus the ATC check flags it as missing in the target SAP system.

The weird part is that we have two other fiori applications that DO not have a controller class tagged to its INDEX.HTML pages and those transport/import just fine. Any ideas how this controller class is generated? Or maybe I am missing something config in the deployment files? I was doing a compare/contrast between the deployment, package.json and manifest.json files of the working fiori apps vs the problamtic one. Not sure if it makes a difference, but the working apps that were transported/imported succesfully are UI5 Freestyle, while the failing apps are Fiori Elements (Flexible Programming Model).

LE_SHP_MODIFY_ITEM Custom logic not working for changing delivery quantity (SAP Cloud ERP)

2026-03-03T12:52:20.551000+01:00

Hello Community,

We need to use LE_SHP_MODIFY_ITEM  logic to change item quantity at delivery bu when we implemented the logic it change the data at backend and cds views but at the screen G_LFIMG value stands constant.

We implemented custom logic as below:

After we created the delivery quantity still seen as 3 at main screen

Bu at picking tab of item LE_SHP_MODIFY_ITEM worked and changed quantity to 1

Even in the cds views values are changed to 1 but still G_LFIMG field seems as 3

BR,
Evrim

fyi @hasanbayram @yusufavci @dogaozdogan

SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition Extensibility

S4HANA Cloud - Fiori Quick Deploy - Change the tile title

2026-03-05T09:10:22.372000+01:00

Hello dear SAP community,

I am facing a quite funny issue. I have deployed a Fiori RAP application on the stack of a S4HANA Cloud system (Public) via the Quick Deploy function in ADT. After while the key user decided, the Fiori tile is not correct and want me to change it.

Unfortunately (from some mysterious reason) the Launchpad App Descriptor object (which contains the needed data) is not editable in Eclipse ADT, when I try to change the field Title in the Tile Details I get this error:

I tried also use the Maintain Translation app to translate it to second language and then from the second language to the source language, but the source language texts cannot be changed.

Does anyone have an idea how to proceed? Last solution for me is to create a new project in BAS and deploy it again from BAS with the correct title, but that's too complicated for the fact I want to change just the Fiori tile text. I also cannot redeploy it from ADT, it seems the Quick Deploy can be executed only once per service binding.

Thank you in advance,

Matus

Released API for F-07 / FB01 / F-44 equivalent posting in SAP S/4HANA Public Cloud

2026-03-11T08:08:16.441000+01:00

Hello SAP Community,

I am currently migrating a custom ECC ABAP report (Bank Reconciliation Statement)
to SAP S/4HANA Public Cloud using the RAP (RESTful ABAP Programming) framework as
a Managed Business Object with Draft.

In ECC, the report posted FI entries using BDC recordings for the following
transactions:

- F-06 → Incoming Customer Payment
- F-07 → Outgoing Vendor Payment
- FB01 → Manual GL Document Posting
- F-44 → Vendor Special GL Clearing (Indicator K)

Since BDC is NOT permitted in Public Cloud, I have been searching for the
equivalent released APIs.

✅ RESOLVED — F-06:
I found and implemented CCPAPI_CUSTOMER_PAYMENT_SRV (Communication Scenario
SAP_COM_0276) via OData HTTP POST. This works correctly.

❌ STILL BLOCKED — F-07, FB01, F-44:

► F-07 (Outgoing Payment):
- API_PAYMENT_INITIATION_SRV → Scope mismatch. Covers payment orders,
not direct FI document posting
- I_JournalEntryTP EML → Error: "The operation CREATE is not activated
for entity I_JOURNALENTRYTP"

► FB01 (Manual GL Posting):
- Same BAPI blocked as above
- I_JournalEntryTP EML → Same CREATE not activated error
- No generic GL document posting API found on SAP API Business Hub

► F-44 (Vendor Special GL Clearing):
- I_JournalEntryTP EML with SpecialGLIndicator field → Same CREATE
not activated error
- Factoring Clearing SOAP API → FI-CA module only, not applicable for FI-AP
- No AP account clearing API found

My Questions:
─────────────
1. What is the correct released API / RAP Business Object to post an
outgoing payment (F-07 equivalent) in Public Cloud?

2. What is the correct API for posting a manual GL document (FB01 equivalent)
programmatically from a RAP behavior class?

3. What is the correct API for clearing a vendor special GL indicator K item
(F-44 equivalent)?

4. Is I_JournalEntryTP the correct Business Object for all of these? If yes,
why is the CREATE operation not activated and how can it be enabled?

5. Is there a Communication Scenario that needs to be set up for
I_JournalEntryTP to work via EML?

Technical Context:
──────────────────
- Development: RAP Managed BO, ABAP for Cloud (Tier 1)
- Root BO: ZI_FI_BRS_STATEMENT (based on I_JournalEntryItem)
- Action: PostBRSItems inside behavior class zbp_i_fi_brs_statement
- System: SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition
- Already tried: MODIFY ENTITIES OF I_JournalEntryTP with COMMIT ENTITIES

Any guidance, SAP Notes, KBA references, or working code examples would be
greatly appreciated.

Thank you in advance!

adding a ew field in post goods receipt page in fiori

2026-03-24T12:31:18.641000+01:00

hello,

I have a requirement with me to add a field called total item amount in the post good receipt for purchase documents page in fiori. The catch is the total amount should be only for seletced number of items.

Since i am new to fiori , can anyone help me on implementation of this req.

regards,

krishna

Custom Business Configuration Sorting the Table using Non-KeyFields

2026-03-26T05:51:59.145000+01:00

Hi Experts,

I am currently using the Custom Business Configuration and have generated some entities. I am currently having issue sorting the table, I have tried using annotations like the one below in the Metadata Extension.

Seems like even with this, it is getting ignored and still sorts by key fields.

Scenario:

Operation - Keyfield	Counter - Keyfield	Country - Non-Keyfield
Flight	1	V
Flight	2	A
Flight	3	D

I want to be able to sort the table by default when opening the application by country which is not a key field and ignore the keyfields with the expected output:

Operation - Keyfield	Counter - Keyfield	Country - Non - Keyfield
Flight	2	A
Flight	3	D
Flight	1	V

In this case, the keyfields was set to hidden for user and will only see the country column, so users would want it to be sorted.

Does anyone have any work around on this?

Creating Production Order Component Line Items via API

2026-03-27T15:17:25.730000+01:00

Hello Expert,

We are currently working on a Custom Application Developed using the RAP (RESTful ABAP Programming) model in SAP S/4HANA Public Cloud, where Batch wise line items are being managed.

As part of our requirement, we are using the A_ProductionOrderComponent_4 API to update values in the CO02 Production Order screen. However, this API does not fully meet our needs.

At present, when using the PATCH method, we are only able to modify existing line items and are unable to create new ones.

Our requirement is to create new line items in the Production Order Component along with the corresponding batch details. We would like to understand if there is any POST method or appropriate API available to support this functionality. Alternatively, we would appreciate any recommendations for a suitable approach to achieve this requirement.

Thank you,

Production order Component line Item

How to handle a POST call in RAP using custom entity

2026-03-30T14:37:16.260000+02:00

I have a requirement where I will receive a payload from an external system and create a notification in SAP.

The source payload fields are custom fields. Using these fields, I need to derive all the required data to create the notification in SAP. This also includes implementing necessary validations and error handling.

What would be the best approach to handle this scenario in RAP? Should we create a custom entity, an abstract entity, or is there a better recommended approach?

In general, we could also create a service in SEGW and handle everything there. However, the goal is to implement this using RAP to stay compliant with a cloud-ready solution.

Thanks in advance 🙂

ABAP RESTful Application Programming Model ABAP Development OData

How to Configure Remote ATC Between SAP BTP ABAP Environment and On‑Premise S/4HANA (Step‑by‑Step)

2026-03-31T12:51:34.129000+02:00

Cloud Connector RFC Mapping – Not Sure Which Settings to Use

When adding an on‑premise ABAP system in Cloud Connector (Protocol = RFC), I am asked to choose:

With load balancing (SID + message server)
Without load balancing (app server + instance number)

I am unsure which one is correct for Remote ATC, and what the exact host/port values should be.

Communication System in BTP ABAP Does Not Show RFC Option

After setting up the Cloud Connector entries, when I create a Communication System in the BTP ABAP Environment, the RFC outbound service is missing, and I cannot create the RFC destination required for Remote ATC.

Object Providers Do Not Appear in Custom Code Migration App

In the Custom Code Analysis Project setup screen,
“Object Provider to Remote System” shows No data available, meaning I cannot continue the Remote ATC configuration.

What Is the Correct End‑to‑End Setup?

I am following SAP’s Remote ATC documentation (Cloud Connector + Communication System + Object Provider), but there seems to be missing prerequisites or configuration steps.

Can someone guide me with the correct end‑to‑end steps?

Specifically:

Which RFC configuration should be used in Cloud Connector (load balancing or not)?
What are the correct message server / app server details for S/4HANA?
How to ensure the Communication System in BTP ABAP recognizes the RFC connection?
How to make Object Providers appear under ATC Administration → Setup?

Any screenshots, step-by-step instructions, or clarifications from someone who has successfully configured Remote ATC would be greatly appreciated.

I tried to follow few SAP blogs but they are very old to follow up.

Thank you!

How to Configure Remote ATC Between SAP BTP ABAP Environment and On‑Premise S/4HANA (Step‑by‑Step)?

2026-04-01T15:59:54.680000+02:00

* Main issue is that I am not able to find " Object provider for remote system" under custom code analysis tile.

Cloud Connector RFC Mapping – Not Sure Which Settings to Use

When adding an on‑premise ABAP system in Cloud Connector (Protocol = RFC), I am asked to choose:

With load balancing (SID + message server)
Without load balancing (app server + instance number)

I am unsure which one is correct for Remote ATC, and what the exact host/port values should be.

Communication System in BTP ABAP Does Not Show RFC Option

Object Providers Do Not Appear in Custom Code Migration App

In the Custom Code Analysis Project setup screen,
“Object Provider to Remote System” shows No data available, meaning I cannot continue the Remote ATC configuration.

What Is the Correct End‑to‑End Setup?

I am following SAP’s Remote ATC documentation (Cloud Connector + Communication System + Object Provider), but there seems to be missing prerequisites or configuration steps.

Can someone guide me with the correct end‑to‑end steps?

Specifically:

Which RFC configuration should be used in Cloud Connector (load balancing or not)?
What are the correct message server / app server details for S/4HANA?
How to ensure the Communication System in BTP ABAP recognizes the RFC connection?
How to make Object Providers appear under ATC Administration → Setup?

Any screenshots, step-by-step instructions, or clarifications from someone who has successfully configured Remote ATC would be greatly appreciated.

I tried to follow few SAP blogs but they are very old to follow up.

Thank you!

I must admit that I’m feeling quite stuck custom code analysis catalog inside Analyze custom code analysis tile , as I can’t find any proper end‑to‑end documentation. The SAP Help Portal only provides fragmented information, and none of the pages explain the full process in a clear, sequential way. Could you please share any link or document where all the steps are described in order? Main blocker is when I go inside the catalog Custom Code Analysis -> Custom code analysis tile -> Create custom code analysis project "Object provider to remote system" is blank.How to get it.

Seeking Guidance on Next Steps After SAP ABAP Cloud Certification

2026-04-05T06:59:24.219000+02:00

Hello SAP Community,

I hope you are doing well.

I have recently completed my certification as an SAP Certified Associate – Back-End Developer (ABAP Cloud). As a fresher entering the SAP ecosystem, I am eager to build my career in the right direction and align my skills with current industry demand.

I would greatly appreciate your guidance on the next steps I should take. Specifically, I am looking for suggestions on:

Which SAP modules or technologies are currently in high demand
Any recommended courses or certifications to complement ABAP Cloud
Skills or tools (such as SAP BTP, Fiori, RAP, etc.) that would enhance my profile
Tips on how to gain practical experience or improve job readiness

Your advice and insights would be extremely valuable in helping me make informed decisions about my career path.

Thank you in advance for your support!

Best regards,
Venkatesh Pagilla

gCTS Developer Workflow Guide

2026-04-06T09:13:56.780000+02:00

For ABAP Developers Transitioning from Traditional CTS

1. GENERAL FLOW: DEV → QAS → PRD
Traditional CTS (What You Know)
DEV ──[Transport Request]──► QAS ──[Transport Request]──► PRD
(STMS) (STMS)

You create a transport request in DEV
You release it
Transport admin imports it into QAS via STMS
After testing, the same TR is imported into PRD
The transport request IS the delivery vehicle

gCTS (What Changes)
DEV ──[commit/push to Git]──► Git Repo ◄──[pull]── QAS
◄──[pull]── PRD

You still create transport requests in DEV (this doesn't change!)
When you release the transport request, gCTS automatically commits the changed objects to the Git repository
There is NO automatic import into QAS — someone must pull from Git into QAS
Same for PRD — someone must pull the desired commit/branch

Step-by-Step: A Normal Development Cycle
In DEV System (Developer's perspective — barely changes)

Open ADT (Eclipse), connect to DEV
Create/modify your ABAP object (class, CDS view, etc.)
Assign it to a transport request — yes, exactly like before
Do your development work
Release the transport task (your subtask) — same as before
Release the transport request — same as before

What happens behind the scenes at release:

gCTS detects the release
The Observer Job (a background job running in DEV) picks up the released TR
It serializes the objects and commits + pushes them to the remote Git repository
The commit message typically contains the TR number and description

Key difference: In traditional CTS, releasing a TR queues it for import via STMS.
In gCTS, releasing a TR triggers a Git commit. There's no STMS import queue.

Moving to QAS (Basis Admin or Release Manager)

Open the Git-enabled CTS Fiori app on the QAS system
Open the relevant repository
You see a list of commits (each one = a released TR from DEV)
Select the commit you want to deploy
Click Pull
gCTS deserializes the objects and imports them into the QAS ABAP system

Traditional CTS equivalent: This replaces the STMS import step. Instead of importing a specific TR, you're pulling a specific Git commit.
Moving to PRD (Same process)

Open Git-enabled CTS Fiori app on PRD
Open the repository
Pull the tested commit (or a release branch)
Objects are imported into PRD

What the Fiori App Shows You
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Git-enabled CTS │
│ │
│ Repository: Z_MY_PROJECT │
│ Branch: main │
│ Current Commit: abc1234 │
│ │
│ Commit History: │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ def5678 - Fix ALV output - TR DEVK900123│ ◄──── Latest │
│ │ abc1234 - Add new report - TR DEVK900122│ ◄──── Current │
│ │ 789abcd - Initial setup - TR DEVK900121│ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
│ [Pull] [Checkout Branch] │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Current Commit = what's currently active in this system's ABAP runtime
Pull = bring a commit (and everything before it) into this system
You pull to a specific commit — all commits UP TO that point come in

2. BUG FIX FLOW: Fixing an Object in PRD
Scenario
Object ZCL_SALES_ORDER exists in PRD. A bug is found. Developer needs to fix it.
Does the ENTIRE object move, or just the delta?
The entire object moves. This is critical to understand.
AspectTraditional CTSgCTSWhat travelsThe entire object (full source)The entire object (full source)GranularityTransport request levelCommit level (= released TR)Delta?No — full object replacementNo — full object in each commit
In Git terms: the repository stores the complete serialized source of each object at each commit. When you pull a commit into QAS/PRD, the full object is deserialized and overwrites what's there.
This is the same as traditional CTS — when you transport ZCL_SALES_ORDER, the entire class moves, not just the changed method.
Multiple Commits on the Same Object
Scenario: Developer makes 3 bug fixes on ZCL_SALES_ORDER across 3 separate TRs.
Commit 1 (TR DEVK900201): Fix method VALIDATE_ORDER
Commit 2 (TR DEVK900202): Fix method CALCULATE_TAX
Commit 3 (TR DEVK900203): Fix method CHECK_STOCK
What happens when you pull into QAS?

If you pull Commit 3: You get ALL three fixes. Pulling a commit means
you get everything up to and including that commit. The system will have
the state of the object as of Commit 3.
If you pull Commit 2: You get fixes 1 and 2, but NOT fix 3.
You cannot cherry-pick just Commit 2 and skip Commit 1.
Pulls are sequential — you move forward to a point in history.

Traditional CTS comparison:
In traditional CTS, you could theoretically import TR 900202 without 900201
(though this would often cause issues). In gCTS, the sequential nature is
enforced — you always move forward to a specific commit, getting everything
before it.
The Bug Fix Workflow: Step by Step
Timeline:
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

1. Bug reported in PRD
│
2. Developer opens ADT → connects to DEV
│
3. Developer modifies ZCL_SALES_ORDER
├── Creates/uses transport request DEVK900201
├── Makes the fix
├── Activates (Ctrl+F3)
├── Tests locally in DEV
│
4. Developer releases TR DEVK900201
│ └── gCTS Observer Job automatically commits + pushes to Git
│
5. In QAS: Basis admin opens gCTS Fiori app
├── Sees new commit for DEVK900201
├── Clicks Pull
├── ZCL_SALES_ORDER is updated in QAS
│
6. QAS testing happens
│
7. In PRD: After approval, admin opens gCTS Fiori app on PRD
├── Pulls the same commit
├── ZCL_SALES_ORDER is updated in PRD
│
8. Bug is fixed in production
Who Does What
ActionWhoWhereToolDevelop & fixDeveloperDEVADT (Eclipse) or SE80Release TRDeveloperDEVADT or SE01Commit to GitAutomaticDEV (Observer Job)BackgroundPull to QASBasis Admin / Release MgrQASgCTS Fiori AppTestQA TesterQASVariousPull to PRDBasis Admin / Release MgrPRDgCTS Fiori App
Using the Fiori App for the Bug Fix
On the QAS system, the admin:

Logs into Fiori Launchpad on QAS
Opens "Git-enabled CTS" app
Selects the repository (e.g., Z_WORKBENCH)
Sees the commit list — the new commit from the developer's released TR is visible
Clicks on the commit → sees which objects are included
Clicks Pull → the commit is pulled, objects are imported
Checks the pull log for success/errors

Same process repeats on PRD after QAS sign-off.

3. DEV STARTING POINT: Developer's Morning Routine
Traditional CTS: What You Did Before

Log into DEV (ADT or SAP GUI)
Find or create your object
Lock it in a transport request
Start coding
No concept of "pulling" — DEV just has whatever was developed there

gCTS: What Changes (and What Doesn't)
The developer does NOT pull in DEV.
This is the most common misconception. Here's why:

DEV is the source of truth — code originates here
The Git repository receives commits FROM DEV
You don't pull into DEV from Git (in the standard flow)
DEV always has the latest state because that's where development happens

Developer's First Action in DEV
It's the same as before:

Open ADT → connect to DEV system
Find your package / object
If creating new: Right-click package → New → [Object Type]
If modifying existing: just open it and start editing
The system prompts for a transport request → create or select one
Code, activate, test
When done: release the TR

There is no "git pull" step in DEV for normal development.
Conflict Scenario: Two Developers, Same Object
Scenario: Developer A and Developer B both need to change ZCL_SALES_ORDER.
In Traditional CTS

Dev A locks the object in TR 900301
Dev B tries to modify → gets a lock error ("Object locked in request DEVK900301 by USER_A")
Dev B must wait, or get Dev A to release, or use a shared TR

In gCTS — It Works the Same Way!
The ABAP lock mechanism hasn't changed. gCTS doesn't add Git-style parallel
editing to the ABAP development experience.

Dev A locks ZCL_SALES_ORDER in their TR
Dev B gets the same lock error
Dev B must wait for Dev A to release

The Git part only kicks in AFTER the TR is released. During active
development, the workflow is identical to traditional CTS.
However, there IS a scenario where gCTS changes things:
Parallel Development with Branches (Advanced)
If your team uses branches (available from S/4HANA 2020):
main branch ─────●─────●─────●──────
\
feature branch ─────●─────●─────

You can create a feature branch in the gCTS Fiori app
DEV system checks out the feature branch
Development happens on that branch
When ready, the branch is merged back to main
QAS/PRD pull from main

But this is an advanced setup. Most teams start with a single main branch,
which makes gCTS feel very similar to traditional CTS.

Quick Reference: Traditional CTS vs gCTS
TopicTraditional CTSgCTSDev creates TRYesYes (unchanged)Dev releases TRQueues for STMS importTriggers Git commitMove to QASSTMS import by adminPull via Fiori appMove to PRDSTMS import by adminPull via Fiori appObject lockingTR-based locksTR-based locks (same)Rollback in QAS/PRDRe-import old TR or manual fixPull an older commitDevelopment toolADT / SE80ADT / SE80 (unchanged)Transport toolSTMS (tcode)gCTS Fiori AppWhere code livesTransport files (.cofiles/.data)Git repositoryVisibilityTransport logsGit commit historyParallel devNot natively supportedBranches (2020+)

The Rollback Advantage (Why gCTS Matters)
This is where gCTS genuinely improves life:
Traditional CTS rollback:

Object broken in QAS after import
You must fix it in DEV, create new TR, release, import again
Or manually revert in QAS (risky, not recommended)

gCTS rollback:

Object broken in QAS after pull
Open gCTS Fiori app on QAS
Find the previous good commit
Pull that commit → system reverts to that state
No need to touch DEV at all for the rollback

This is one of the biggest practical benefits of gCTS.

Summary: What Actually Changes for a Developer
Almost nothing in daily coding. You still:

Use ADT or SE80
Create transport requests
Lock objects in TRs
Activate objects
Release TRs

What changes:

After release, your code goes to Git (automatically)
Moving to QAS/PRD uses the Fiori app "Pull" instead of STMS "Import"
You can see full commit history in the Fiori app
Rollbacks become much easier
Branching is possible (if your team adopts it)

Choose transport popup - functionality on a custom Fiori Application?

2026-04-07T19:28:49.524000+02:00

Hi all - We have a custom Fiori application that is based on a older legacy program of ours. With clean clore being the goal alot of our source code has been adjusted to use SAP ABAP cloud released objects. The Fiori application has checkboxes for user selection on the UI and when trigerred -> ABAP back-end will add entries to some custom DB tables that we have. Our old legacy program allowed the user to choose a customizing request via a popup to capture these entries in the transport. The idea is to build out the same functionality on our Fiori Application. Prompt user for customizing transport on the UI and then capture the DB entries to the selected transport.

We used the below function modules for the transport functionality in our old legacy program that I believe are no longer clean core compatabile/not released for public cloud. Has anybody had a similar requirement in the past? Does SAP have released cloud objects to replace the older function modules? Doing some research into this at the moment.
CALL FUNCTION 'TRINT_ORDER_CHOICE'
CALL FUNCTION 'TR_OBJECTS_INSERT'

ABAP FS connection issue with BTP ABAP Trial system

2026-04-08T14:42:36.921000+02:00

I have installed the ABAP remote filesystem( ABAP FS ) extension in VS Code. But, while connecting my BTP ABAP Trial system, the following error message comes up - "Failed to create cloud connection: HTTPError: Response code 403 (Unified Connectivity: Forbidden)".

CDS to get Approver Name of Purchase Contract

2026-04-08T15:14:15.977000+02:00

We have activated flexible workflow for Purchase Contract in S4 Hana Public Cloud , Wanted to fetch the approver name of purchase contract. Couldn't able to get the desired CDS. Can you help please ?

Cloud

app for loading materials while respecting clean core principles

2026-04-16T16:22:53.631000+02:00

I want to create an application that loads materials in Excel format and inserts the data according to the standard. Previously, I would have used a BAPI, but from what I understand, this wouldn't be compatible with the SAP core. What would be the correct approach: RAP -> SAP API? Considering that using only RAP could cause time limit issues for very large volumes?

S4 -> ON-PREMISE 2021

Is PO Creation via RAP (EML) using I_PURCHASEORDERTP_2 Possible in S/4HANA Public Cloud?

2026-04-20T07:22:16.885000+02:00

Hi Experts,

In SAP S/4HANA Public Cloud, is it possible to create Purchase Orders through a RAP application using EML by consuming the standard business object interface I_PURCHASEORDERTP_2, based on data received from an external system (e.g., via Excel upload)?

Please let me know if this approach is supported or not.

Thanks in advance!

abap service instance unavailable

2026-04-20T08:49:42.117000+02:00

PLease help me , I am getting is error on opening up the dashboard of my abap service instance , its a standard version and i have alot of applications connected to it and all have gone down .