https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ajmaradiaga/feeds/main/scmt/topics/Cloud-qa.xml SAP Community - Cloud 2026-05-13T02:00:12.581928+00:00 python-feedgen Cloud Q&A in SAP Community https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/how-to-start-learning-sap-trainings-courses/qaq-p/14227899 how to start learning SAP - trainings, courses 2025-09-25T14:56:46.352000+02:00 sherpy_evening https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2256485 <DIV class=""><P>Hi everybody,&nbsp;</P><P>I’m new here and I have a question. I want to learn SAP and am new to this technology. Yes, I know it’s pretty tough with a lot to learn. But I want to do it because I want to change my profile. My background is data warehouse development, data modeling, and ETL development. Here I want to pivot instead of diving deeper into AWS or Azure cloud; I want to learn SAP, maybe SAP BTP and Cloud.</P><P>What do you think? Are these good topics for the future and with my background? Is there anyone here who can offer advice on which courses and trainings to start with for an introduction?</P></DIV> 2025-09-25T14:56:46.352000+02:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/sap-ai-and-cloud-a-new-era-of-enterprise-systems/qaq-p/14231231 SAP, AI, and Cloud: A New Era of Enterprise Systems 2025-09-30T08:01:29.983000+02:00 neel247 https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2256886 <H2 id="toc-hId-1761786819">SAP Today: A Technical Perspective</H2><P>When we talk about SAP today, it’s no longer just about ERP. The platform now integrates with AI, machine learning, and cloud technologies. For example, SAP <STRONG>S/4HANA</STRONG> supports real-time analytics. Instead of waiting hours for batch reports, finance and operations teams can work with live data and speed up decision-making.</P><P>Integration is another key area. Many organizations run multiple systems: CRM, HR, supply chain, and more. SAP <STRONG>BTP</STRONG> (Business Technology Platform) provides a framework that lets these systems communicate. That reduces data duplication, cuts manual steps, and gives more reliable outcomes.</P><P>There is also a notable shift toward sustainability and compliance. SAP includes capabilities to track carbon footprints, manage ESG data, and meet global reporting standards. This is now a requirement in many industries, and the platform provides tools to handle the related complexity.</P><P>From a technical view, the migration path is important. Moving from ECC to <STRONG>S/4HANA</STRONG> is not just a technical upgrade it requires rethinking processes. Many organizations use the migration to automate workflows, add predictive analytics, or connect IoT devices to ERP. It is as much transformation as it is technology.</P><P>In short, SAP is evolving beyond an ERP backbone into a digital core covering analytics, integration, compliance, and automation. The convergence of SAP with AI and cloud-native apps will continue to deepen this role.</P> 2025-09-30T08:01:29.983000+02:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/connection-issue-between-sap-btp-trial-and-s-4hana-on-premise-via-cloud/qaq-p/14248571 Connection Issue Between SAP BTP Trial and S/4HANA On-Premise via Cloud Connector 2025-10-20T14:07:04.600000+02:00 kannanchokkanathan1 https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/747534 <P>Hi All,</P><P>I’m currently configuring the connectivity between our SAP BTP free trial account and our S/4HANA on-premise system using the Cloud Connector. After completing the setup, I tried to validate the connection between the cloud and on-premise systems, but I encountered an error.</P><P>Upon checking the related SAP Note, it seems that the issue might be due to a possible spelling mistake in the host name or a connectivity issue with the internal host.</P><P>I have verified that the internal hostname and port are correct, and I also checked in SICF in on-premise system to ensure the correct internal host and port are maintained. However, the connection is still not working. I’m using an HTTPS connection.</P><P><span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="kannanchokkanathan1_1-1760961715393.png" style="width: 999px;"><img src="https://community.sap.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/329866i056B67843A3BFA32/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;px=999" role="button" title="kannanchokkanathan1_1-1760961715393.png" alt="kannanchokkanathan1_1-1760961715393.png" /></span></P><P><span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="kannanchokkanathan1_0-1760961595210.png" style="width: 999px;"><img src="https://community.sap.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/329864i6731601834814BBF/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;px=999" role="button" title="kannanchokkanathan1_0-1760961595210.png" alt="kannanchokkanathan1_0-1760961595210.png" /></span></P><P>Could you please help me resolve this issue?</P><P>BR/Kannan.</P> 2025-10-20T14:07:04.600000+02:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/btp-trial-account/qaq-p/14259510 BTP trial account 2025-11-03T18:00:18.456000+01:00 Pravin_Pagar https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2263198 <P>Hello SAP Community,</P><P>I want to share my strong disappointment regarding the recent changes to the <STRONG>SAP BTP Free Tier/Trial accounts</STRONG>. These restrictions are making it very difficult for new developers and learners to use the platform.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><H3 id="toc-hId-1892957728">1. The Deployment Block</H3><P>&nbsp;</P><P>The biggest issue is stopping the deployment of apps in BTP for free.</P><UL><LI><P><STRONG>BTP is a platform for running apps.</STRONG> If we can't deploy our prototypes and completed tutorials, we can't truly learn how the platform works end-to-end.</P></LI><LI><P>This is a <STRONG>major setback</STRONG> for anyone trying to get hands-on experience and makes BTP far less accessible for the community.</P></LI></UL><P>&nbsp;</P><H3 id="toc-hId-1696444223">2. Request to Restore Memory</H3><P>&nbsp;</P><P>I also want to request a return to the older, more generous limits:</P><UL><LI><P><STRONG>Please restore the allowed memory limit to 4GB.</STRONG> The current reduced memory quota is too small for many real-world development examples and makes the platform feel unusable for meaningful learning.</P></LI></UL><P>I urge the SAP BTP team to <STRONG>reconsider these decisions.</STRONG></P><P>A truly usable free tier is an investment in the future of the BTP developer community. Please restore the ability to deploy applications and give us back the 4GB of memory.</P><P>Thank you for listening.</P> 2025-11-03T18:00:18.456000+01:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/supply-chain-management-q-a/basic-inbound-process-procedure-in-ewm-cloud/qaq-p/14260885 Basic Inbound Process Procedure in EWM Cloud 2025-11-05T05:39:07.974000+01:00 PushpaTharshini https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2080452 <P>Hi</P><P>pls help me by giving the procedure to do a basic inbound process in EWM Cloud</P><P>From PO to GR</P><P>Thanks in Advance</P> 2025-11-05T05:39:07.974000+01:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/issue-with-cds-join-for-sd-amp-fi-documents-for-custom-irn-rap-application/qaq-p/14272947 Issue with CDS Join for SD & FI Documents for Custom IRN RAP Application 2025-11-19T17:19:32.704000+01:00 Yash_Rudraksha https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1970930 <P>Hello Expert,</P><P>I am working on a custom RAP based Fiori Elements Application for IRN and E-Way Bill Generation. Currently, we generate the IRN using the SD Document Type based on the CDS view I_BillingDocumentBasic.</P><P>As per the new requirement, we also need to include FI Documents, so we are using the CDS view I_JournalEntryItem. Our objective is to retrieve DG and DR documents using a UNION ALL, but we are facing an issue where some required fields are not appearing. I have attached a Code of the CDS view which we have&nbsp; Developed.</P><P>Could anyone guide us on what might be causing the join issue or how we can achieve this requirement in our custom IRN application?</P><P>We have created two CDS views one is a join of the FI and SD document CDS views, and the another is the Backend CDS view used for IRN Generation where we fetch the Document Type.</P><P>Please find the attached First CDS view which has Join logic for both the SD and FI Document CDS views.</P><pre class="lia-code-sample language-abap"><code>@AbapCatalog.viewEnhancementCategory: [#NONE] @AccessControl.authorizationCheck: #NOT_REQUIRED @EndUserText.label: 'Billing and FICO Document Type Join' @Metadata.ignorePropagatedAnnotations: true define view entity ZI_INV_FI_DOC_JOIN as select from I_BillingDocumentBasic as VBRK inner join I_BillingDocumentItemBasic as VBRP on VBRK.BillingDocument = VBRP.BillingDocument { key VBRK.BillingDocument as BillingDocument, key VBRP.BillingDocumentItem as BillingDocumentItem, VBRK.CompanyCode as CompanyCode, VBRK.BillingDocumentType as BillingDocumentType, VBRK.AccountingExchangeRate as AccountingExchangeRate, VBRK.DocumentReferenceID as DocumentReferenceID, VBRK.BillingDocumentDate as BillingDocumentDate, VBRK.CreationDate as CreationDate, VBRK.PayerParty as Customer, @Semantics.amount.currencyCode: 'TransactionCurrency' VBRK.TotalNetAmount as TotalNetAmount, VBRK.TransactionCurrency as TransactionCurrency, VBRP.Plant as Plant, VBRP.ReferenceSDDocument as ReferenceSDDocument, VBRP.ReferenceSDDocumentItem as ReferenceSDDocumentItem, VBRP.Material as Material, @Semantics.quantity.unitOfMeasure: 'BillingQuantityUnit' VBRP.BillingQuantity as BillingQuantity, VBRP.BillingQuantityUnit as BillingQuantityUnit, VBRP.BaseUnit as BaseUnit, @Semantics.amount.currencyCode: 'TransactionCurrency' VBRP.NetAmount as NetAmount } union all select from I_JournalEntry as BKPF inner join I_JournalEntryItem as ACDOCA on BKPF.AccountingDocument = ACDOCA.AccountingDocument { key BKPF.AccountingDocument as BillingDocument, key cast(ACDOCA.AccountingDocumentItem as abap.char(6)) as BillingDocumentItem, BKPF.CompanyCode as CompanyCode, BKPF.AccountingDocumentType as BillingDocumentType, BKPF.ExchangeRate as AccountingExchangeRate, BKPF.DocumentReferenceID as DocumentReferenceID, BKPF. PostingDate as BillingDocumentDate, ACDOCA.CreationDate as CreationDate, ACDOCA.Customer as Customer, ACDOCA.AmountInTransactionCurrency as TotalNetAmount, ACDOCA.TransactionCurrency as TransactionCurrency, ACDOCA.Plant as Plant, BKPF.DocumentReferenceID as ReferenceSDDocument, ACDOCA.SourceReferenceDocumentItem as ReferenceSDDocumentItem, ACDOCA.Product as Material, ACDOCA.Quantity as BillingQuantity, ACDOCA.ReferenceQuantityUnit as BillingQuantityUnit, ACDOCA.BaseUnit as BaseUnit, ACDOCA.AmountInTransactionCurrency as NetAmount }</code></pre><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Here is the another CDS view where we are using this CDS view in the background for fetching the Document Type of SD &amp; FI.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><pre class="lia-code-sample language-abap"><code>@AccessControl.authorizationCheck: #NOT_REQUIRED @EndUserText.label: 'view entity to pick Invoice number' @Metadata.ignorePropagatedAnnotations: true define root view entity ZBR_INV_EDOC_PICK with parameters iv_fkdat : abap.dats as select from ZI_INV_FI_DOC_JOIN as _VBRK_BKPF left outer join I_ProductText as MAKT on MAKT.Product = _VBRK_BKPF.Material left outer join I_Plant as t001w on t001w.Plant = _VBRK_BKPF.Plant inner join I_Customer as KNA1 on KNA1.Customer = _VBRK_BKPF.Customer inner join ZR_EDOC_TYPE as EIDOCTYPE on EIDOCTYPE.CompanyCode = _VBRK_BKPF.CompanyCode and EIDOCTYPE.BillingType = _VBRK_BKPF.BillingDocumentType inner join I_ProductPlantBasic as marc on marc.Product = _VBRK_BKPF.Material and marc.Plant = _VBRK_BKPF.Plant inner join I_CompanyCode as t001 on t001.CompanyCode = _VBRK_BKPF.CompanyCode left outer join I_IN_PlantBusinessPlaceDetail as PBplace on PBplace.Plant = _VBRK_BKPF.Plant and PBplace.CompanyCode = _VBRK_BKPF.CompanyCode left outer join I_IN_BusinessPlaceTaxDetail as BBRANCH on BBRANCH.CompanyCode = _VBRK_BKPF.CompanyCode and BBRANCH.BusinessPlace = PBplace.BusinessPlace association [0..1] to I_Currency as _TransactionCurrency on $projection.TransactionCurrency = _TransactionCurrency.Currency association [0..1] to I_UnitOfMeasure as _BillingQuantityUnit on $projection.BillingQuantityUnit = _BillingQuantityUnit.UnitOfMeasure { key _VBRK_BKPF.BillingDocument, key _VBRK_BKPF.BillingDocumentItem, _VBRK_BKPF.CompanyCode, _VBRK_BKPF.BillingDocumentType, _VBRK_BKPF.AccountingExchangeRate, _VBRK_BKPF.DocumentReferenceID, _VBRK_BKPF.BillingDocumentDate, _VBRK_BKPF.CreationDate, @Semantics.amount.currencyCode: 'TransactionCurrency' _VBRK_BKPF.TotalNetAmount, @ObjectModel.foreignKey.association: '_TransactionCurrency' _VBRK_BKPF.TransactionCurrency, _VBRK_BKPF.Plant, _VBRK_BKPF.ReferenceSDDocument, _VBRK_BKPF.ReferenceSDDocumentItem, _VBRK_BKPF.Material, PBplace.BusinessPlace, MAKT.ProductName, @Semantics.quantity.unitOfMeasure: 'BillingQuantityUnit' _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantity, @ObjectModel.foreignKey.association: '_BillingQuantityUnit' _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit, _VBRK_BKPF.BaseUnit, @Semantics.amount.currencyCode: 'TransactionCurrency' _VBRK_BKPF.NetAmount, LIKP.DeliveryDocument, LIKP.ShipToParty, LIKP._ShipToParty.BPCustomerName as LBPCustomerName, LIKP._ShipToParty.TaxNumber3 as LTaxNumber3, LIKP._ShipToParty._AddressDefaultRepresentation.CityName as LCityName, LIKP._ShipToParty._AddressDefaultRepresentation.DistrictName as LDistrictName, LIKP._ShipToParty._AddressDefaultRepresentation.PostalCode as LPostalCode, LIKP._ShipToParty._AddressDefaultRepresentation.StreetName as LCStreetName, LIKP._ShipToParty._AddressDefaultRepresentation.StreetPrefixName1 as LCStreetPrefixName1, LIKP._ShipToParty._AddressDefaultRepresentation.StreetPrefixName2 as LCStreetPrefixName2, LIKP._ShipToParty._AddressDefaultRepresentation.StreetSuffixName1 as LCStreetSuffixName1, t001w.PlantName, t001w.AddressID as PAddressID, t001w._StandardOrganizationAddress.AddresseeFullName, t001w._StandardOrganizationAddress.StreetName, t001w._StandardOrganizationAddress.CityName, t001w._StandardOrganizationAddress.DistrictName, t001w._StandardOrganizationAddress.PostalCode, t001w._StandardOrganizationAddress.StreetPrefixName1, t001w._StandardOrganizationAddress.StreetPrefixName2, t001w._StandardOrganizationAddress.StreetSuffixName1, BBRANCH.IN_GSTIdentificationNumber, KNA1.Customer, KNA1.BPCustomerName, KNA1.AddressID as CAddressID, KNA1.TaxNumber3 as CTaxNumber3, KNA1._AddressDefaultRepresentation.CityName as CCityName, KNA1._AddressDefaultRepresentation.DistrictName as CDistrictName, KNA1._AddressDefaultRepresentation.PostalCode as CPostalCode, KNA1._AddressDefaultRepresentation.StreetName as CStreetName, KNA1._AddressDefaultRepresentation.StreetPrefixName1 as CStreetPrefixName1, KNA1._AddressDefaultRepresentation.StreetPrefixName2 as CStreetPrefixName2, KNA1._AddressDefaultRepresentation.StreetSuffixName1 as CStreetSuffixName1, t001.CompanyCodeName, t001.AddressID as CCAddressID, t001._OrgAddressDefaultRprstn.CityName as CCCityName, t001._OrgAddressDefaultRprstn.PostalCode as CCPostalCode, t001._OrgAddressDefaultRprstn.StreetName as CCStreetName, t001._OrgAddressDefaultRprstn.StreetPrefixName1 as CCStreetPrefixName1, t001._OrgAddressDefaultRprstn.StreetPrefixName2 as CCStreetPrefixName2, t001._OrgAddressDefaultRprstn.StreetSuffixName1 as CCStreetSuffixName1, BBRANCH.IN_GSTIdentificationNumber as CCGSTIN, EIDOCTYPE.BillingType, EIDOCTYPE.InvoiceType, EIDOCTYPE.IrnDocType, EIDOCTYPE.SupplyType, EIDOCTYPE.IrnApp, EIDOCTYPE.EwbApp, EIDOCTYPE.EwbDocType, EIDOCTYPE.ProcessType, _VBRK_BKPF.AccountingExchangeRate * _VBRK_BKPF.AccountingExchangeRate as exrate, @Semantics.amount.currencyCode: 'TransactionCurrency' cast ( cast ( _VBRK_BKPF.NetAmount as abap.dec( 15, 5 ) ) * _VBRK_BKPF.AccountingExchangeRate as abap.curr(15,2) ) as taxvalue, @Semantics.amount.currencyCode: 'TransactionCurrency' cast ( cast ( _VBRK_BKPF.NetAmount as abap.dec( 15, 5 ) ) * _VBRK_BKPF.AccountingExchangeRate / cast( _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantity as abap.dec(13,5) ) as abap.curr(15,2 )) as unitprice, marc.ConsumptionTaxCtrlCode, case when _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'kg' or _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'KG' then 'KGS' when _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'ea' or _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'EA' then 'NOS' when _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'pc' or _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'PC' or _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'st' or _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'ST' then 'PCS' when _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'dr' or _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'DR' then 'DRM' when _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'ft2' or _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'FT2' then 'SQF' when _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'g' or _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'G' then 'GMS' when _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'm2' or _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'M2' then 'SQM' when _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'm3' or _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'M3' then 'CBM' when _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'ml' or _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'ML' then 'MLT' when _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'paa' or _VBRK_BKPF.BillingQuantityUnit = 'PAA' then 'PRS' else 'OTH' end as zunit, _TransactionCurrency, _BillingQuantityUnit } where _VBRK_BKPF.CreationDate = $parameters.iv_fkdat</code></pre><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Thank you,</P> 2025-11-19T17:19:32.704000+01:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/minecraft-1-21-124-bedrock-edition-android-gesti%C3%B3n-de-recursos-en-la-nube-y/qaq-p/14280678 Minecraft 1.21.124 Bedrock Edition Android Gestión de Recursos en la Nube y Latencia S3 2025-12-01T05:44:56.134000+01:00 padmakrishnadev https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2268384 <P>Referencia del caso técnico y discusión original: ***REMOVED BY MODERATION***</P> <P>Hola comunidad tecnológica. Mientras investigaba sobre la optimización de entrega de contenido estático para aplicaciones móviles de alto tráfico en entornos Android, me encontré con un escenario interesante de configuración en AWS que podría ser relevante para quienes gestionamos integraciones híbridas.</P> <P>El caso de estudio se centra en la distribución de paquetes de actualización (específicamente identificados como la versión 1.21.124) y los conflictos que surgen entre las políticas de acceso público de S3 y la distribución de CloudFront.</P> <P><STRONG>Análisis de la Infraestructura 1.21.124</STRONG></P> <P>Al intentar desplegar recursos pesados para clientes Android, la configuración presenta desafíos que se asemejan mucho a lo que vemos en SAP BTP cuando gestionamos grandes volúmenes de datos no estructurados. He estructurado los puntos clave que se discuten en el enlace superior:</P> <UL> <LI><STRONG>Sincronización de Datos:</STRONG><SPAN>&nbsp;</SPAN>Problemas de latencia al conectar el bucket S3 con la aplicación cliente en tiempo real.</LI> <LI><STRONG>Permisos de Acceso:</STRONG><SPAN>&nbsp;</SPAN>Conflictos en las ACL (Listas de Control de Acceso) que bloquean la descarga de archivos esenciales.</LI> <LI><STRONG>Optimización de Carga:</STRONG><SPAN>&nbsp;</SPAN>Necesidad de invalidar la caché de CloudFront para asegurar que la versión 1.21.124 se despliegue correctamente sin errores 403.</LI> </UL> <P><STRONG>Detalles de Configuración y Rendimiento</STRONG></P> <P>Para mantener la estabilidad del sistema bajo carga, se destacan los siguientes parámetros técnicos que deben ser revisados:</P> <OL> <LI><STRONG>Validación de Origen:</STRONG><SPAN>&nbsp;</SPAN>Asegurar que el OAI (Origin Access Identity) esté correctamente vinculado.</LI> <LI><STRONG>Compatibilidad Android:</STRONG><SPAN>&nbsp;</SPAN>Ajuste de headers HTTP para garantizar que el cliente móvil interprete correctamente los paquetes JSON.</LI> <LI><STRONG>Redundancia:</STRONG><SPAN>&nbsp;</SPAN>Estrategias para evitar la caída del servicio durante picos de petición.</LI> </OL> <P><STRONG>Discusión</STRONG></P> <P>Basándome en el enlace de AWS compartido al inicio, mi duda para los expertos aquí es: ¿Cómo manejarían ustedes esta validación de seguridad si estos activos estáticos estuvieran alojados en un entorno integrado con SAP Document Management Service? ¿Sería más eficiente mantener la política de bloqueo público estricta o utilizar URLs firmadas para este tipo de versiones?</P> <P>Agradezco sus comentarios sobre esta arquitectura.</P> 2025-12-01T05:44:56.134000+01:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/financial-management-q-a/custom-logic-for-payment-advice-to-add-profit-center/qaq-p/14282556 Custom logic for payment advice to add profit center 2025-12-03T07:52:15.675000+01:00 Dinakar1996__19 https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1553329 <P>We are using custom logic for the profit center population in the payment advice form (business context: FINS_PAYMENT_ADVICE_ITEM, ID: FBL_PAYM_ADV_PRINT_ITEM ). The issue is Profit center of the 1st line is repeated for the all the line in the payment advice.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>DATA: lv_comp &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;TYPE c LENGTH 4,<BR />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; lv_jou &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; TYPE c LENGTH 10,<BR />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; lv_year &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;TYPE c LENGTH 4,<BR />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; lv_pft_ctr &nbsp; &nbsp; TYPE i_journalentryitem-profitcenter,<BR />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; lv_pft_desc &nbsp; &nbsp;TYPE i_profitcentertext-profitcentername,<BR />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; lc_lang &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;TYPE c LENGTH 1 VALUE 'E',<BR />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; wa_item &nbsp; &nbsp; LIKE LINE OF paymentpaiditems.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>LOOP AT paymentpaiditems INTO wa_item.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>&nbsp; CLEAR: lv_comp, lv_jou, lv_year, lv_pft_ctr, lv_pft_desc.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>&nbsp; lv_comp = wa_item-doc2r+0(4).<BR />&nbsp; lv_jou &nbsp;= wa_item-doc2r+4(10).<BR />&nbsp; lv_year = wa_item-doc2r+14(4).</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>&nbsp; SELECT SINGLE profitcenter<BR />&nbsp; &nbsp; INTO <a href="https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1419942">@LV</a>_pft_ctr<BR />&nbsp; &nbsp; FROM i_journalentryitem<BR />&nbsp; &nbsp; WHERE companycode &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;= <a href="https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1419942">@LV</a>_comp<BR />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AND accountingdocument = <a href="https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1419942">@LV</a>_jou<BR />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AND fiscalyear &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; = <a href="https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1419942">@LV</a>_year.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>&nbsp; IF lv_pft_ctr IS NOT INITIAL.<BR />&nbsp; &nbsp; SELECT SINGLE profitcentername<BR />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; INTO <a href="https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1419942">@LV</a>_pft_desc<BR />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; FROM i_profitcentertext<BR />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; WHERE profitcenter = <a href="https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1419942">@LV</a>_pft_ctr<BR />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; AND language &nbsp; &nbsp; = <a href="https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1390929">@LC</a>_lang.<BR />&nbsp; ENDIF.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>&nbsp; payment_advice_item_ext-yy1_pftctrpaymentadvic_avi = lv_pft_desc.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>ENDLOOP.</P> 2025-12-03T07:52:15.675000+01:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/unable-to-purchase-any-product-in-sap-store-as-partner-edge/qaq-p/14289996 Unable to purchase any product in SAP Store as partner edge 2025-12-14T11:55:48.192000+01:00 Vinicius_Asada https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1424003 <P>Dear team,&nbsp;</P><P>We are currently unable to purchase any products as a partner, including Free Tier solutions, we have tried on multiple channels:</P><P>1. Purchase via SAP Discovery Center:</P><P>Add the product to an 'estimate'&gt;<BR />'Buy now' option&gt;<BR />Redirected to a '<SPAN class="">Configure&nbsp;</SPAN><SPAN class="">SAP Business Technology Platform', even trough we have an active SAP BTP account with many products, and our contract/license is valid on me.sap.com<BR /></SPAN></P><P><span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Vinicius_Asada_1-1765709214438.png" style="width: 400px;"><img src="https://community.sap.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/351826i0785F46B1469C0A3/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;px=400" role="button" title="Vinicius_Asada_1-1765709214438.png" alt="Vinicius_Asada_1-1765709214438.png" /></span></P><P><SPAN class="">2- When we try to purchase an SKU in me.sap:</SPAN></P><P><SPAN class=""><SPAN>Partnership&gt;<BR /></SPAN><SPAN>Test, Demo &amp; Development License&gt;<BR />Order Cloud License&gt;<BR />Select any product&gt;<BR />Buy now&gt;<BR />We get error:</SPAN></SPAN></P><DIV class=""><SPAN class=""><SPAN>'User (S-user) is NOT assigned to Buyer authorization S4M_BUYLIC. Please&nbsp;<A href="https://store.sap.com/supportrequest/iframe?categoryL1=digitalNative" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">contact support</A>.</SPAN><SPAN class="">&nbsp;(Code: VAL_0004)'</SPAN></SPAN></DIV><DIV class=""><SPAN class=""><SPAN>'We are unable to process your order. Please&nbsp;<A href="https://store.sap.com/supportrequest/?transactionType=CONTACT_SUPPORT&amp;language-iso=en-US&amp;customerID=50825609&amp;userIdentity=S0027114360&amp;emailAddress=vinicius.asada%40mavhub.com&amp;product=8019913&amp;productName=cloud+test%2C+demo%2C+and+development+for+SAP+Build+runtime&amp;categoryL1=digitalNative&amp;categoryL2=&amp;validationCode=VAL_0004&amp;headerInfo=" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">contact support</A>.</SPAN><SPAN class="">&nbsp;(Code: DCPCPS_015)'</SPAN></SPAN></DIV><P><span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Vinicius_Asada_0-1765709193473.png" style="width: 400px;"><img src="https://community.sap.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/351825iC1ECE47C5EBB5011/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;px=400" role="button" title="Vinicius_Asada_0-1765709193473.png" alt="Vinicius_Asada_0-1765709193473.png" /></span></P><P>We have already opened multiple cases with Discovery Center support. After a delay of approximately five days, the only response received was a request to log in using an S-user with Super Admin role — which we already have and are using.</P><P>Please clarify the root cause and how this can be resolved.</P><P>&nbsp;</P> 2025-12-14T11:55:48.192000+01:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/bw-on-hana-bw-pce-lift-amp-shift-realistic-split-of-sap-vs-customer-partner/qaq-p/14302805 BW on HANA →BW PCE (Lift & Shift): realistic split of SAP vs customer/partner Basis responsibilities 2026-01-07T12:58:29.592000+01:00 u2grumi7531 https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/831485 <P>Hi all,</P><P>We are requested to support a BW on HANA 7.5 migration / lift to the private cloud edition.</P><P>I recently attended an SAP webinar about SAP Business Data Cloud and BW Private Cloud Edition. During the Q&amp;A, I asked about the typical split of responsibilities and effort between SAP AG Basis and customer/partner Basis during a <EM>lift &amp; shift</EM> migration of <STRONG>BW on HANA 7.5 to BW 7.5 PCE</STRONG>.</P><P>The answer was roughly <EM>“~70% SAP AG Basis, ~30% customer”</EM>, but the presenter also mentioned this was more of a rough estimate.</P><P>I would be interested in hearing <STRONG>practical project experiences</STRONG> from the community:</P><UL><LI><P>Which activities are typically handled by <STRONG>SAP AG</STRONG> (beyond infrastructure and system copy)?</P></LI><LI><P>Which activities realistically remain with the <STRONG>customer or a partner</STRONG> (e.g. preparation, cleanup, user/role validation, testing, cutover coordination)?</P></LI><LI><P>In projects where the customer had <STRONG>limited or no PCE experience</STRONG>, how important was a partner Basis/BW role to bridge the gap?</P></LI><LI>Does it suffice to plan for 1 Clinent / Partner Basis resource + 1 SAP AG Basis + 1 BW resource?</LI><LI>How long does it take to move a 3 tier BW system having ca. 2 TB in prod into the cloud targetting for only a 2-tier landscape (QA/DEV together and PROD)</LI><LI>Did you face any major issues with connections to other systems, performance, process chains, queries/ reports, roles / access after the lift to PCE?</LI></UL><P>Thanks in advance for sharing your experience.</P> 2026-01-07T12:58:29.592000+01:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/json-payload-download-implementation-in-rap-application/qaq-p/14307708 JSON Payload Download Implementation in RAP Application 2026-01-15T05:43:26.518000+01:00 Yash_Rudraksha https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1970930 <P>Hello Expert,</P><P>I am currently working on a custom RAP (RESTful ABAP Programming Model) Application in SAP S/4HANA Public Cloud. In this application, we use an API to send data to an external portal.</P><P>Now there is a new requirement when the user clicks a button, the JSON payload that is used in the ABAP program for sending data via the API should be downloaded in JSON format.</P><P>For this purpose, I have already created a custom action in the Behavior Definition, and the button is visible in the Application. My question is how to implement the download functionality so that the same JSON payload used for the API call can be downloaded by the user in JSON format and Also, please explain how to implement the JSON download functionality in the RAP application with step by step guidance.</P><P>Thank you,</P> 2026-01-15T05:43:26.518000+01:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/how-to-configure-managed-approuter-to-serve-cap-endpoints/qaq-p/14317758 How to configure managed approuter to serve CAP endpoints? 2026-01-29T13:50:23.553000+01:00 YABAPER https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1545341 <P>Hi all,</P><P>I have a fullstack CAP cloud application along with a managed approuter. I am having some trouble getting the approuter to correctly point to my cap service (currently without a UI). Currently the approuter correctly points to my ui5 page (capbase) but my cap service (dev-capbase-srv) returns the error message&nbsp;</P><PRE>Cannot GET /&nbsp;</PRE><P>However, when I append the /odata/v4/catalog/Employees to my url I get a 401 unauthorized error. But I have tested this via postman by generating a bearer token and can then see the data displayed. But my question is why is my approuter not directing me to this service automatically without having to append the /odata/v4/catalog/Employee endpoint to my url:&nbsp;<A href="https://port4004-workspaces-ws-ak3uq.us10.trial.applicationstudio.cloud.sap/odata/v4/catalog/Employees" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer">port4004-workspaces-ws-ak3uq.us10.trial.applicationstudio.cloud.sap/</A><BR /><BR />Further information: I have a fiori list report generated in my app folder for this CAP employee service<BR />my xs-app.json file is as follows:</P><pre class="lia-code-sample language-json"><code>{ "routes": [ { "source": "^/odata/v4/catalog/(.*)$", "target": "/odata/v4/catalog/$1", "destination": "srv-api", "csrfProtection": false, "authenticationType": "xsuaa" } ], "welcomeFile": "/interfacebase" }</code></pre><P>mta.yaml&nbsp;</P><pre class="lia-code-sample language-yaml"><code>_schema-version: 3.3.0 ID: capbase description: A simple CAP project. version: 1.0.0 modules: - name: capbase-srv type: nodejs path: gen/srv requires: - name: capbase-auth provides: - name: srv-api properties: srv-url: ${default-url} parameters: buildpack: nodejs_buildpack instances: 1 memory: 256M build-parameters: builder: npm-ci - name: capbase type: approuter.nodejs path: app/router requires: - name: srv-api group: destinations properties: forwardAuthToken: true name: srv-api url: ~{srv-url} - name: capbase-auth - name: capbase-html5-runtime - name: capbase-destination-service group: destinations properties: forwardAuthToken: false name: ui5 url: https://ui5.sap.com provides: - name: app-api properties: app-protocol: ${protocol} app-uri: ${default-uri} parameters: disk-quota: 256M keep-existing-routes: true memory: 256M - name: capbase-app-deployer type: com.sap.application.content path: gen requires: - name: capbase-auth - name: srv-api - name: capbase-html5-repo-host parameters: config: HTML5Runtime_enabled: true content-target: true build-parameters: build-result: app/ requires: - artifacts: - interfacebase.zip name: interfacebase target-path: app/ - artifacts: - employeeui.zip name: employeeui target-path: app/ - name: interfacebase type: html5 path: app/interfacebase build-parameters: build-result: dist builder: custom commands: - npm install - npm run build:cf supported-platforms: [] - name: employeeui type: html5 path: app/employeeui build-parameters: build-result: dist builder: custom commands: - npm install - npm run build:cf supported-platforms: [] resources: - name: capbase-auth type: org.cloudfoundry.managed-service parameters: config: oauth2-configuration: credential-types: - binding-secret - x509 redirect-uris: - https://*~{app-api/app-uri}/** tenant-mode: dedicated xsappname: capbase-${org}-${space} path: ./xs-security.json service: xsuaa service-plan: application requires: - name: app-api - name: capbase-html5-repo-host type: org.cloudfoundry.managed-service parameters: service: html5-apps-repo service-plan: app-host - name: capbase-html5-runtime type: org.cloudfoundry.managed-service parameters: service: html5-apps-repo service-plan: app-runtime - name: capbase-destination-service type: org.cloudfoundry.managed-service parameters: config: HTML5Runtime_enabled: false init_data: instance: destinations: - Authentication: NoAuthentication Name: ui5 ProxyType: Internet Type: HTTP URL: https://ui5.sap.com existing_destinations_policy: update version: 1.0.0 service: destination service-name: capbase-destination-service service-plan: lite parameters: deploy_mode: html5-repo enable-parallel-deployments: true build-parameters: before-all: - builder: custom commands: - npm ci - npx cds build --production</code></pre><P>&nbsp;</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>&nbsp;</P> 2026-01-29T13:50:23.553000+01:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/delete-f4579-configuration/qaq-p/14329273 Delete F4579 configuration 2026-02-16T13:30:51.518000+01:00 d_schuitemaker62 https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/716640 <P>We created a SAP Business Configuration via the ADT generator, usable in F4579.</P><P>We now want to delete it.</P><P>If we look up the maintenance object via Open Object in Eclipse, this gives an error.</P><P>We tried deleting it via the TR, and via TADIR. This does not work: the configuration is still there in F4579.</P><P>Does anyone know how to do this?</P> 2026-02-16T13:30:51.518000+01:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/how-to-setup-duplicate-checks-on-mdg-cloud-edition-2602/qaq-p/14331152 How to setup Duplicate Checks on MDG Cloud Edition 2602? 2026-02-18T16:12:48.573000+01:00 FranciscoZanotti https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1970757 <P>Hi, I'm fairly new to MDG Cloud Edition and I can't find enough information online. Everything I find is either about on premise, private cloud or public cloud. The Cloud Edition page from sap is very high level, it doesn't go enough into details to be helpful.<BR /><BR />Could someone explain the step by step to setup or configure Duplicate checks for Business Partners?<BR />What are the possibilities there?</P> 2026-02-18T16:12:48.573000+01:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/develop-custom-report-in-sap-s-4-hana-public-cloud/qaq-p/14336228 Develop custom report in SAP S/4 HANA public cloud 2026-02-25T08:20:11.487000+01:00 harshita_k10a126 https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2283678 <DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><P>Hello Experts,</P><P>I am currently working with <STRONG>SAP S/4HANA Public Cloud Version 2602.0.59</STRONG> and would like to develop a <STRONG>custom report</STRONG> within the system. Could you please guide me on the required steps to achieve this?</P><P>Any insights, best practices, or resources on how to approach this task in SAP S/4HANA Cloud would be greatly appreciated.</P><P>Looking forward to your responses!</P><P>Best regards,<BR />Harshita</P></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV><DIV class=""><DIV><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><H3 id="toc-hId-1919647620">&nbsp;</H3></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV> 2026-02-25T08:20:11.487000+01:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/sp-iqindexinfo-assertions/qaq-p/14341855 sp_iqindexinfo assertions 2026-03-04T21:43:02.393000+01:00 suhanigarg22 https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/672711 <DIV>I would like to seek your guidance regarding the behavior of sp_iqindexinfo following recent changes in the dev branch.<BR />On the dev branch, IQ_SYSTEM_TEMP is no longer returned from SYSIQDBFILE (change <SPAN><A href="https://git.wdf.sap.corp/c/dtiq_sqla/+/7033387" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">7033387</A></SPAN>). After this change, I am encountering dbtest assertion failures related to DBSpPct while running cn_partition.tst.<BR />Observed behavior:<BR />Dev branch<BR />• SYSIQDBFILE contains dbspace 16388 but no entry for 16385<BR />• sp_iqclouddbspace() returns:</DIV><UL><LI>iqcn_user</LI><LI>IQ_SYSTEM_TEMP (HDLFS path present)</LI></UL><DIV>Master branch<BR />• SYSIQDBFILE includes dbspace 16385<BR />• sp_iqclouddbspace() returns only iqcn_user<BR />Following this change, dbtest assertions from sp_iqindexinfo are failing, for example:<BR />• DBSpPct for DBA.pt1dbsp9 = 20 (expected ≤ 19)<BR />• DBSpPct for DBA.pt1.C2_FPdbsp4 = 36 (expected ≤ 30)<BR />Based on my understanding:<BR />• DBSpBlks represents total capacity in blocks<BR />• IQ_SYSTEM_TEMP is managed separately in Cloud and its entry was removed from SYSIQDBFILE<BR />• If TEMP capacity is not included in the denominator, DBSpBlks becomes smaller<BR />• A smaller denominator results in a higher percentage, leading to assertion failures<BR />I also reviewed change <SPAN><A href="https://git.wdf.sap.corp/c/dtiq_sqla/+/5396042" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">5396042</A></SPAN> but I was unable to clearly understand how DBSpPct limits are derived, particularly when IsDataLakeTest is true versus false.<BR />Please provide your guidance on the following:</DIV><OL><LI>Should sp_iqindexinfo be adjusted to handle the absence of IQ_SYSTEM_TEMP in SYSIQDBFILE?</LI><LI>Are the dbtest DBSpPct limits expected to change due to this behavior?</LI><LI>What would be the recommended approach to debug this assertion?</LI></OL> 2026-03-04T21:43:02.393000+01:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/custom-business-configuration-sorting-the-table-using-non-keyfields/qaq-p/14358407 Custom Business Configuration Sorting the Table using Non-KeyFields 2026-03-26T05:51:59.145000+01:00 JitYang96 https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2252863 <P>Hi Experts,</P><P>I am currently using the Custom Business Configuration and have generated some entities. I am currently having issue sorting the table, I have tried using annotations like the one below in the Metadata Extension.</P><P><span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="JitYang96_0-1774499969671.png" style="width: 400px;"><img src="https://community.sap.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/389019i685F5B05169A0DEE/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;px=400" role="button" title="JitYang96_0-1774499969671.png" alt="JitYang96_0-1774499969671.png" /></span><BR />Seems like even with this, it is getting ignored and still sorts by key fields.</P><P>Scenario:</P><TABLE border="1" width="64.74892588614394%"><TBODY><TR><TD width="37.122432705139474%" height="30px">Operation - Keyfield</TD><TD width="31.818181818181817%" height="30px">Counter - Keyfield</TD><TD width="40.151515151515156%" height="30px">Country - Non-Keyfield</TD></TR><TR><TD width="37.122432705139474%" height="30px">Flight</TD><TD width="31.818181818181817%" height="30px">1</TD><TD width="40.151515151515156%" height="30px">V</TD></TR><TR><TD width="37.122432705139474%" height="30px">Flight</TD><TD width="31.818181818181817%" height="30px">2</TD><TD width="40.151515151515156%" height="30px">A</TD></TR><TR><TD width="37.122432705139474%" height="30px">Flight</TD><TD width="31.818181818181817%" height="30px">3</TD><TD width="40.151515151515156%" height="30px">D</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><P>I want to be able to sort the table&nbsp;by default when opening the application by country which is not a key field and ignore the keyfields with the expected output:</P><TABLE border="1" width="501px"><TBODY><TR><TD width="165.688px">Operation - Keyfield</TD><TD width="152.688px">Counter - Keyfield</TD><TD width="181.625px">Country - Non - Keyfield</TD></TR><TR><TD width="165.688px">Flight</TD><TD width="152.688px">2</TD><TD width="181.625px">A</TD></TR><TR><TD width="165.688px">Flight</TD><TD width="152.688px">3</TD><TD width="181.625px">D</TD></TR><TR><TD width="165.688px">Flight</TD><TD width="152.688px">1</TD><TD width="181.625px">V</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><P>In this case, the keyfields was set to hidden for user and will only see the country column, so users would want it to be sorted.</P><P>Does anyone have any work around on this?&nbsp;</P> 2026-03-26T05:51:59.145000+01:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/ecs-broke-our-rise-pce-waf-2-and-ecs-cannot-fix-it/qaq-p/14362803 ECS broke our RISE PCE WAF 2 and ECS cannot fix it 2026-03-31T14:03:24.712000+02:00 Bakerm00 https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/155308 <P>After 4 years in RISE PCE (Azure) we finally were requested by SAP to raise a ticket with ECS to migrate from WAF v1 to WAF v2.</P><P>it looks like ECS have hand crafted the configuration - its not via a defined terraform, bicep or arm template.&nbsp; the WAF v2 rules are in restricted mode and&nbsp;nothing really works...</P><P>Fiori tiles won't work;&nbsp; icon image are missing</P><P>ECS won't provide an export of the WAF config so we can compare and review - even though its our tenant and a shared security model.</P><P>you will have to forgive my ignorance in that as RISE PCE the WAF should have a defined security template that doesn't need any tweaking.</P><P>we already know SAP don't follow MS best practice for SAP on azure; or i would have had WAF v2 4 years ago.</P><P>Anyone got any suggestions i can bat back into ECS?</P> 2026-03-31T14:03:24.712000+02:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/after-moving-to-rise-with-sap-what-changed-the-most-in-your-operating-model/qaq-p/14379780 After moving to RISE with SAP, what changed the most in your operating model or delivery approach? 2026-04-21T17:31:46.838000+02:00 Mariano_BacaStorni https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2294817 <P>Moving to RISE with SAP is often framed as a technical shift, but in practice, it tends to change how teams actually work.</P><P>Things like ownership, decision-making, and even how delivery is structured don’t always stay the same. In some cases, processes become more standardized; in others, teams need to adapt in ways they didn’t fully expect.</P><P>If you’ve gone through that transition, what changed the most for you in your operating model or delivery approach?</P> 2026-04-21T17:31:46.838000+02:00 https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/how-has-rise-with-sap-changed-ownership-across-teams-in-your-organization/qaq-p/14385458 How has RISE with SAP changed ownership across teams in your organization? 2026-04-28T17:32:18.191000+02:00 JeanCh https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2119967 <P>Since moving to RISE with SAP, things kind of shifted around. Stuff like infrastructure isn't really ours anymore as SAP handles most of that. We've been in the process of figuring out what we actually own.</P><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><P>We’re less involved in the technical operations and more focused on integration and making processes work across the business. At the beginning it wasn’t always clear who owned what, but over time it’s become more defined.</P><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><DIV class=""><P>Curious to hear how others are navigating that shift, has it made things simpler or just different?</P></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV><DIV class="">&nbsp;</DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV><DIV class="">&nbsp;</DIV> 2026-04-28T17:32:18.191000+02:00