SAP Community - FIN (Finance)

CAMT Import Error: Message About Old GVCs Despite New BTC Configuration (OT83)

2026-02-03T10:42:43.040000+01:00

Dear Community,
We have set up CAMT for a customer, including the new BTC codes. However, when the file is imported, the account statement is not posted because it displays a message stating that the old GVCs and the external transaction code UNALLOCATED are not maintained.

However, this cannot be the case because the new BTCs are maintained, as is the Unallocated code.
It also pulls the new transaction type. This is already stored in the bank accounts. This concerns the old GVCs 166 and 804.
The entire setup was done in transaction OT83.

Nevertheless, the following message appears:

Has anyone had this problem and knows what could be causing it?

Thank you.
Best Regards,
Vanessa

#onprem #camt #gvc

How to change bank account on the invoice form in SAP Public Cloud

2026-02-03T11:01:27.094000+01:00

Hello everyone,

I have a problem with the bank account on the invoice output. The invoice output only shows one specific bank account, even if this account is deactivated in the Manage Bank Accounts app. I set up a different bank account number in the same app that I want to show on the invoice form, but the change didn't show up in the output.
Could you please clarify where exactly I can specify or activate the bank account to be used for the invoice? Alternatively, what settings are required for this?

Thank you in advance for your help.

Accout code which is posted by FAGL_FCV automatically

2026-02-04T03:09:25.058000+01:00

Hi all,

I would like to ask about Account code which is posted by FAGL_FCV automatically.

When I execute FAGL_FCV, SAP will automatically calculate valuation gain or loss and post using specific account code.

I want to change the specific account code which is automatically used by "Valuation area".

Do you know if it is possible?

Planned delivery cost with variance account

2026-02-04T07:21:03.637000+01:00

Hi All,

There is a case that I have a 35% tariff cost in a PO, and the actual tariff cost less than the PO cost, so supposed the difference will go to inventory account if there is enough stock. After I check the stock balance by MB5B, and there is enough stock here. But it still trigger our variance account in OBYC-PRD. Can anyone explain why? This condition type is revelevant to the inventory.

reverse setelment of period 12/2025 in period2/2026

2026-02-04T20:18:05.769000+01:00

today 4.2.2026 my user discover that he had make a mistake when setelment process orders in 12/2025 and whant to reverse the setelement today with setelememt period and posting period 12/2025

how over ob52 period 12 is open , no locked period in opk1 i get error "invalid posting period" how to do what user need ?

thank you

Customer invioce VAT 0,01 differnce coming

2026-02-05T10:16:00.467000+01:00

Hi ,

We have created upload program for uploading customer invoice(FB01) . However 50% invoices posted correctly but 50% invoices having VAT difference 0,01 . SAP calculating 23,60 but as per our books its only 23,59 .

how to solve it ?

Example VAT 22%

	Account	amount		Tax 22%
DR	Customer	130,82		Q7
CR	A GL	13,64		Q7
CR	A GL	69,74		Q7
CR	B GL	3,85		Q7
CR	C GL	20		Q7
CR	VAT	23,6	differnce 0,01

FX Diff/Gain Not Posting in Posting area 2 (Auto Clearing)

2026-02-06T12:01:30.353000+01:00

Hi experts,

I am experiencing an issue while setting up automatic bank statement clearing for a customer. We are using payment orders; however, the FX gain/loss is not posted automatically when the payment order is cleared automatically in Posting Area 2.

When I reprocess Posting Area 2 manually using the payment order, the FX gain/loss is posted correctly and works as expected.

What I want the system to post:

How does SAP perform the posting when both posting areas are processed automatically:

Thanks in advance,

Alice

BTE 1820 causing dump when calling WLS Screening REST API

2026-02-06T18:30:29.497000+01:00

Hello ,

We have a requirement to block or allow payments during the F110 payment proposal run based on the response from the SAP Watch List Screening (WLS) REST API.

To achieve this, we implemented BTE 00001820, where we: Call the WLS REST API (send vendor + bank) and Process the response to update the zlspr

Functionally, the logic works as expected when i debug the loop i get the items and each time the api runs and return the result . However, after finishing the loop , we consistently get the following runtime dump:

Runtime Error: DBSQL_INVALID_CURSOR

Exception: CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB

Short Text: Cursor already closed or not open yet

Program: SAPF110S

FORM: BSIK_SELEKTION_2

The dump only occurs when the REST API call is executed. If the REST call block is commented out, the dump no longer occurs. This suggests that calling the REST API inside BTE 1820 is interfering with open database cursors during the F110 processing.

Is there another BTE that is better suited for implementing this logic and setting the payment block (ZLSPR) based on screening results i did some search but could't find the suitable one ?

Alternatively, is there a safe way to keep this implementation in BTE 1820 without causing the DBSQL_INVALID_CURSOR dump?

Any guidance or recommendations would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you

FAGL_FCV-Posting period 002 2026 is not open

2026-02-09T13:21:45.866000+01:00

Dear Experts,

I am running the FAGL_FCV to revaluate the forex. but attached error occurred. I think this happen for the non leading ledger. but i cant find the SPRO steps to remove this error. HOPE YOUR VALUABLE COMMENTS!!!!

Double checks in one page from F110

2026-02-09T17:19:00.059000+01:00

Dear Sapients,

We have a requirement for a specific country to print 2 checks in a single page. Currently if the payment is generated for 2 suppliers, it creates 1 single spool with 2 pages.

I've gone through the older posts and somebody had a similar requirement but for SAP Scripts. For Scripts, we had designed a custom driver program to handle it but with our new system, we've migrated to Adobe forms and it uses driver program SAPFPAYM. The calling logic in SAPFPAYM isn't as straightforward as RFFOUS_C. It calls a lot of FMs dynamically to build the dataset and call the form. I've also gone through the events in OBPM1 but I haven't found anything useful.

If anybody knows of a simpler way to handle this instead of creating a custom driver program, please do let me know. I'd be super grateful!

Issue with San Marino Electronic Invoicing via SDI (S/4HANA 2023)

2026-02-09T19:15:38.691000+01:00

Hello,

We have successfully implemented the SDI (Sistema di Interscambio) for Italy on our S/4HANA 2023 system.

While the process is working correctly for domestic Italian customers, we are encountering an issue with customers based in San Marino. Although we are using the correct configuration (IT4 - Italy, IPA code: 2R4GTO8), these transactions are not appearing in the eDocument Cockpit (EDOC_COCKPIT).

I have checked the Value Mapping in transaction /AIF/VMAP, but I couldn't find any specific restrictions or missing entries blocking this flow.

Do you have any insights or recommendations on why these specific documents are not being triggered in the cockpit?

Philippe
FIN (Finance) #Edocument

Issue – Purchase Requisition Creation for Lean Services in SAP PS

2026-02-10T13:23:01.431000+01:00

Hi experts,

We are currently encountering an issue when generating Purchase Requisitions from components in SAP Project System for Lean Services. The scenario concerns materials of type SRV with Product Type Group 2 (Lean Services), within a project and network configured in Enhanced Procurement Mode. This mode has been correctly activated at both the Project Profile level and the Network/Plant level.

The first issue observed is the absence of any option related to services in the Project Builder user-specific settings. When navigating to Project Builder and accessing the user-specific options, only standard processable objects such as materials and activities are available. No setting allows services or lean services to be defined as processable objects.

The second issue occurs during the creation of a Purchase Requisition from a material component using Lean Service ( materials of type SRV with Product Type Group 2 ). When attempting to generate the PR, the system displays an error message requesting the entry of a “Validity Start Date.” However, this field is not available or visible in the Project Builder interface for either the component or the related network activity, making it impossible for the user to provide the required information.

This behavior is observed exclusively for Lean Services, as non stocked material components do not trigger the same error and function correctly.

Experts, could you please help identify the root cause of this issue and propose an appropriate solution?

Bank GL Accounts

2026-02-10T17:42:41.600000+01:00

I am using SAP S4 HANA Public cloud. I have created multiple main bank and bank clearing accounts for each of my SPV/Subsidiary, as copies of Main Bank Acct (GL 11001000) and Bank Transfer C/S (GL 11001020). However, in the newly created clearing accounts, the default SAP Main bank account (11001000) is auto assigned as the reconciliation acccount. I want to link the newly created clearing accounts to the newly created main bank GLs, but it shows the following warning when I try this:

Need some assistance with this

MR21 and MDG

2026-02-12T15:11:08.406000+01:00

Hello everyone,

i have one question about MDG client and price update. I am trying/testing changing price using LSMW tool. I have a recording for MR21.

When i try it in MDG, the prices are not updated and i am wondering if it is possible. i mean, if the MR21 cannot be used in MDG.

Best regards

BCF Execution & its Impact to BW & BEx Reporting

2026-02-16T16:46:57.842000+01:00

Currently, during the year-end BCF run, the process takes a significant amount of time, including the BW load. Given the large number of entities in ECC, the activity takes more than 15–20 days to complete along with BW load synchronization. Additionally, I am unable to complete the BCF run in a single stretch, as this results in BW data load errors. Is there a better automation option available to streamline this process and reduce the overall runtime?

Change company code in f110 proposal

2026-02-17T16:05:13.782000+01:00

Change company code in f110 proposal stage in AFS ecc6 based on some logic for only one company code

FB50 Display only

2026-02-18T10:39:36.855000+01:00

Dear expert,

need help to set FB50 tcode from preventing user posting doc, but user can display from this menu bar

I have set the role authorization to display only (ACTVT = Display) but the user still can posting doc (save)
please help

Regards

“In BI: Is BSEG-KOART sufficient to determine Account field, or must we map BSCHL→TBSL→KOART?”

2026-02-19T07:16:54.685000+01:00

Hi Experts,

I’m trying to reproduce SAP FI document “Account” determination logic (similar to FB03 display) in an external BI/graph analytics solution (ECC).

Background / My understanding

In SAP, an accounting document is identified by the key:

BUKRS (Company Code), BELNR (Document Number), GJAHR (Fiscal Year)

And line items are stored in BSEG.

For “Account” display, my understanding of SAP’s standard concept is:

BSEG has BSCHL (Posting Key) and KOART (Account Type)

Posting Key is configured in TBSL, which also contains KOART (account type) per posting key

Then “Account” shown is chosen depending on KOART (e.g., S→HKONT, D→KUNNR, K→LIFNR, A→ANLN1, M→MATNR)

Key Question

When extracting data to BI, I already have BSEG-KOART stored in the line items.

So instead of reconstructing:
BSEG-BSCHL → join TBSL → get KOART → determine which account field to use,

Can I directly use:
BSEG-KOART (as stored) → determine account field (HKONT/KUNNR/LIFNR/ANLN1/MATNR)

In other words:

Is BSEG-KOART always the “final” account type that SAP already validated at posting time?

Are there any scenarios where relying only on BSEG-KOART could be wrong (e.g., special G/L, alternative account determination, substitutions, document splitting, etc.), such that I must re-check KOART via TBSL?

I want to confirm whether BSEG-KOART alone is sufficient for correct account selection logic in BI (to match SAP’s behavior), or if TBSL-based mapping must be applied for correctness.

Thanks in advance.

RAJABS00 - Contact your system administrator (table error) - Message no. AA833

2026-02-24T13:27:53.567000+01:00

RAJABS00 - Contact your system administrator (table error) - Message no. AA833

HI all,
the business would like to prepare the annual financial statements in asset accounting – program RAJABS00.
The program runs in test mode fine.
In productive mode, the program Canceled with error in SM37 -

Contact your system administrator (table error)
Message no. AA833

Diagnosis

Depreciation area 20 has not been defined in company code xxxx.

Procedure

Define the depreciation area using the Customizing menu.

--> for the Company code xxxx is no depreciation area 20 maintained.

Best regards
Thomas

Issue Uploading Austrian Foreign Payment File pain.001.001.09 Error

2026-02-24T13:35:52.828000+01:00

Dear Team,

We are currently testing the Austrian foreign payment file upload in the bank portal. However, the upload is failing, and we are receiving the attached error message from the bank system.