https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ajmaradiaga/feeds/main/scmt/topics/SAP-R3-qa.xmlSAP Community - SAP R/32026-02-11T00:13:33.308027+00:00python-feedgenSAP R/3 Q&A in SAP Communityhttps://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/how-to-add-object-s-arcd-res-to-user-id/qaq-p/13715785How to add object S_ARCD_RES to user id?2024-05-29T12:42:38.944000+02:00ashish_pancholihttps://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/881365<P>I am new to SAP. I am trying to archive the PO document and load using SARI. The PO document has been archived and stored on the content server successfully, but when I am trying to load the PO document using SARI, it is complaining: "Handle 0 is not known." Message no. BA021.I tried to check in the SAP notes and found the cause and resolution for the issue: </P><P>Cause<BR />The user is missing the required authorization.</P><P>Resolution<BR />Ensure that the user has the authorization for object S_ARCD_RES (with activity 02).</P><P><STRONG>I need help to know how to add the object S_ARCD_RES to the user ID. </STRONG></P><P>Thanks</P>2024-05-29T12:42:38.944000+02:00https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/migrate-data-from-sap-r-3-4-7-to-sap-s-4hana-cloud-public-suggestion/qaq-p/13716953migrate data from SAP R/3 (4.7) to SAP S/4HANA Cloud (public), suggestion?2024-05-30T12:01:17.182000+02:00KaviMhttps://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1464815<P>Hello Everyone,<BR />Is there any possible way to migrate data from SAP R/3 (Version 4.7) to SAP S/4HANA Cloud (Public)? Could you please suggest the possible methods?</P>2024-05-30T12:01:17.182000+02:00https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/no-down-payments-exist-message-no-f5005-but-it-is-showing-as-an-open-item/qaq-p/13719712No down payments exist Message No. F5005 but it is showing as an open item could you pls provide sol2024-06-03T12:10:48.116000+02:00bharath080896https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/892278<P>Dear Community,</P><P>When I try to clear customer down payments in F-39, an error message appears saying that no down payments exist But it is showing as an open item in FBl5N. Could you please provide me with a solution for this?</P><P>Thanks</P><P>Regards,</P><P>Bharath</P>2024-06-03T12:10:48.116000+02:00https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/will-the-data-migration-from-ecc-to-sap-s-4-hana-include-the-data-from-link/qaq-p/13742416Will the data migration from ECC to SAP S/4 Hana include the data from link tables and the AIS?2024-06-25T17:49:07.722000+02:00ashish_pancholihttps://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/881365<P>I'm new to SAP migration. I would like to know if we decide to use a data migration strategy such as the SAP S/4HANA migration cockpit, which uses an RFC connection to transfer data directly from SAP ECC 6.0 to SAP S/4HANA. Is the data migration from ECC 6.0 to SAP S/4 Hana taking into account link tables like ADMI_FILES and indexed data from the archive information structure?</P><P>Thanks</P>2024-06-25T17:49:07.722000+02:00https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/need-some-more-clarity-on-sap-note-2545209/qaq-p/13743199Need some more clarity on SAP Note: 25452092024-06-26T13:22:41.211000+02:00ashish_pancholihttps://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/881365<P>Hi Team,</P><P>I am going through SAP Note 2545209 and came across one point, which is causing me confusion. Here is the solution from SAP Notes, which says as below, but the one that makes me confused here is that information structures will not change, and hence the display will work. As you can see below, </P><P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px" style="padding-left : 30px;"><U><STRONG>Solution</STRONG></U><BR /><EM>Standard Existing Reports (enabled to read from archive) that were available in ECC and now available in S/4 can still display the FI data that was archived before the upgrade to S/4. <STRONG>This is because information structures will not change, and hence the display will work.</STRONG> However, any new report based on "HANA Live" CDS View, OData Protocol, or Ina Protocol will "not" be read from the archive.</EM></P><P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px" style="padding-left : 30px;"><EM>This is applicable for all the releases in S/4.</EM></P><P>So does it mean information structures will not migrate, thus they will remain unchanged, or does it mean they are coming as-is from old ECC 6.0, thus they are unchanged, so it will work without any issue?</P><P>If someone could provide more information, that would be great because scenarios may be different. Also, is that a green-filed or brown-filed approach? </P><P>Thanks</P>2024-06-26T13:22:41.211000+02:00https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/getobject-call-does-no-longer-find-sapgui-in-running-object-table-while-gui/qaq-p/13777886GetObject call does no longer find SAPGUI in Running Object Table while GUI scripting in R/32024-07-31T08:17:27.478000+02:00Jan_Brhttps://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1570400<P>I have come across a rather annoying bug in GUI scripting when connecting to SAP via GetObject(“SAPGUI”). This bug occurs for me both in Excel VBA as well as with Python3:</P><P>At a certain point, a connection to SAP can no longer be established if SAP is opened alternately by script and manually. Some time ago I posted this <A href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/77104909/why-does-the-same-win32-com-getobject-call-same-line-of-code-only-in-certain-c" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer">post</A> on StackOverflow, unfortunately without any answers. At that time, the problem occurred mainly when alternating between manually calling the Logon Pad and the sapshut.exe. Now I have the same problem, although the programmatic start of SAP is also done via the Logon Pad and no longer uses sapshut.exe which I thought was a workaround.</P><P><SPAN>The fastest way to reproduce this behavior is for me:</SPAN></P><OL><LI><SPAN>Start SAP manually via logon (session is open) → connecting script works</SPAN></LI><LI><SPAN>Close SAP completely</SPAN></LI><LI><SPAN>Open SAP via script (as soon as the logon is there, a connection should be possible) → connecting works</SPAN></LI><LI><SPAN>Close SAP completely and open again manually (like 1.) → connecting no longer works</SPAN></LI><LI><SPAN>Restarting the computer enables connecting to a manually startet session again</SPAN></LI></OL><P>Has anyone ever encountered the same problem? Is SAP perhaps entered differently in ROT and “SAPGUI” is not always fitting?</P>2024-07-31T08:17:27.478000+02:00https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/any-set-of-rules-how-to-fill-sd-table-tvwa-goodsreceivinghours/qaq-p/13871134Any set of rules how to fill SD Table TVWA GoodsReceivingHours?2024-09-19T15:34:29.363000+02:00Christian_83https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1745499<P>Dear Community,</P><P>I just checked the goods receiving hours in our customer data and found that there is a huge variation in how my colleagues filled the fields.</P><P><STRONG>1st question:</STRONG><BR />Are there any rules defined by SAP on how to fill these fields? I couldn´t find anything within the helping sections.</P><P><STRONG>2nd question:</STRONG><BR />I have an excel export for the fieds. Is there a possibility to change the times in the excel sheet and to import it back to SAP?<BR /><BR />Thanks in advanced!<span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":smiling_face_with_heart_eyes:">😍</span><BR />Christian<BR /><BR />Here is an example how the monday is used in our customer data: <BR />H: <SPAN>WAMOAB1</SPAN><BR />I: <SPAN>WAMOBI1</SPAN><BR />J: <SPAN>WAMOAB2</SPAN><BR />K: <SPAN>WAMOBI2</SPAN></P><P><span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Christian_83_0-1726752652103.png" style="width: 400px;"><img src="https://community.sap.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/168517iF950058CF4B6F713/image-size/medium?v=v2&px=400" role="button" title="Christian_83_0-1726752652103.png" alt="Christian_83_0-1726752652103.png" /></span></P><P> </P><P> </P><P> </P>2024-09-19T15:34:29.363000+02:00https://community.sap.com/t5/crm-and-cx-q-a/commerce-cloud-occ-v2-stateless-for-spartacus-with-synchronous-order/qaq-p/13934168Commerce Cloud: OCC V2 stateless (for Spartacus) with synchronous order management (LORD in SAP R3)2024-11-11T13:31:30.808000+01:00juliancookiehttps://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/686047<P>Hey at all,</P><P>i try to figure out the following: Is there a default way to use SOM (LORD with SAP R3) in comibination with OCC V2 (stateless) with spartacus?</P><P>Now in Detail:<BR />We are trying to implement Spartacus (Composable Storefront) at the moment. Actually we are using the default b2b storefront with SAP R3 and the synchronous order management (Lean order management).<BR />I checked out the standard code and in - for example - <FONT face="courier new,courier">DefaultBolCartFacade -> public Basket getCart()</FONT>. There the code is referencing to bean '<SPAN><FONT face="courier new,courier">sapOrdermgmtCartBO</FONT>'</SPAN> which is stored in the scope called '<FONT face="courier new,courier">sapSession</FONT>'.<BR />Of course the session scope - and the <FONT face="courier new,courier">sapSession</FONT> - in the OCC V2 is not available anymore because of the stateless system. So its not possible to store the ERP Basket in the <FONT face="courier new,courier">sapSession</FONT>.<BR />How to handle this situation? Do we have to implement our own solution or is there something which i can use from SAP?<BR />Have someone the same situation?</P><P>Thank you all!!</P>2024-11-11T13:31:30.808000+01:00https://community.sap.com/t5/financial-management-q-a/credit-management-is-there-a-tcode-for-orders-released-but-not-invoiced-yet/qaq-p/13968290Credit Management: Is there a TCode for orders released but not invoiced yet?2024-12-19T11:57:29.027000+01:00peter_sochahttps://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1920846<P>Hi Team,</P><P>As inquired in the topic <span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":smiling_face_with_sunglasses:">😎</span>, I am looking for a TCode where I can list orders released but not yet invoiced, is there a single Tcode which will allow to pull the report, or we need to 2 or more TCodes for this task requiring a kind of reports reconciliation <span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":thinking_face:">🤔</span>.</P><P>Would appreciate your assistance <span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_big_eyes:">😃</span><span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":flexed_biceps:">💪</span>.</P><P>Best regards,</P><P>Piotr</P>2024-12-19T11:57:29.027000+01:00https://community.sap.com/t5/financial-management-q-a/s-alr-87012218-credit-master-sheet-fields/qaq-p/13968301S_ALR_87012218 - Credit Master Sheet fields2024-12-19T12:08:52.713000+01:00peter_sochahttps://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1920846<P>Hi Team,</P><P>I am currently working under what I believe is SAP FI or perhaps FI-CA module, while reviewing the credit master sheet (TCode in the topic) for a given customer I am wondering about the logic of some fields:</P><P> </P><P><span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="peter_socha_1-1734606241916.png" style="width: 400px;"><img src="https://community.sap.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/203650iBCCA4A555FE18AA9/image-size/medium?v=v2&px=400" role="button" title="peter_socha_1-1734606241916.png" alt="peter_socha_1-1734606241916.png" /></span></P><P>We can exclude special liabilities, this is fine. Nevertheless, I was thinking from where SAP pulls the data or is there a TCode we can dig deeper into the values.</P><P>Perhaps my question arose since the values come from other modules than FI-CA which currently I do not have access to <span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_sweat:">😅</span>.</P><P>Would appreciate your feedback <span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":smiling_face_with_sunglasses:">😎</span><span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":ok_hand:">👌</span>.</P><P>Best regards,</P><P>Piotr</P>2024-12-19T12:08:52.713000+01:00https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/lines-with-no-open-qty-on-scheduling-agreement-still-appears-on-zdsr-report/qaq-p/14000589Lines with No Open Qty on Scheduling Agreement still appears on ZDSR report2025-01-29T16:24:52.024000+01:00cocoloakumhttps://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1915931<P>Hello all,</P><P>My organization uses the ZDSR100 report to determine what is past due/has not shipped. </P><P>We recently started using scheduling agreements for blanket orders and have been having some issues with items that have already shipped and have no open qty still showing up as past due.</P><P>Is there a way to prevent lines with no open qty from showing up on our ZDSR100 report without removing the line from the scheduling agreement? (I've been told that if you remove any lines manually, it could prevent future schedules from posting via EDI. Is this true?)</P><P>Thanks everyone in advance for your assistance!</P><P><span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 1.png" style="width: 999px;"><img src="https://community.sap.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/218813i21E460E780100C7B/image-size/large?v=v2&px=999" role="button" title="Screenshot 1.png" alt="Screenshot 1.png" /></span></P><P><span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2.png" style="width: 999px;"><img src="https://community.sap.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/218815iC80E84FF92B3D8E7/image-size/large?v=v2&px=999" role="button" title="Screenshot 2.png" alt="Screenshot 2.png" /></span></P>2025-01-29T16:24:52.024000+01:00https://community.sap.com/t5/supply-chain-management-q-a/mrp-run-not-to-consider-batches-with-expiry-date/qaq-p/14050244MRP run not to consider batches with expiry date2025-03-19T18:40:14.316000+01:00rammeshokumarhttps://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1454666<P>Dear team</P><P>We want to run MRP for 6 months and we do not want MRP to consider batches which are going to expire in 6 months in future.</P><P> </P><P>BR</P><P>Ramesh Kumar</P>2025-03-19T18:40:14.316000+01:00https://community.sap.com/t5/supply-chain-management-q-a/automatic-barcode-label-printing-via-control-key-automatic-gr/qaq-p/14058396Automatic Barcode Label Printing via Control Key automatic GR2025-03-27T09:21:14.579000+01:00Gokcenbaykushttps://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2016405<P>Hi all,</P><P>(#SAP R/3 is used in my company)</P><P>I have a question related with trigger of barcode label printing via control key automatic GR. I have 1 customized control key that provide automatic goods receipt after confirmation (Production order). After this step, I would like to have barcode label automatically. For this purpose, I have created a new output type via spro (M706) that the application is ME (Inventory Management). Related program and PDF/smart form is added to the output type. Also, I used §§ function that provide created by. Medium is 1-print output (Partner functions in output type). Then, I created condition records for movement type 101 and event type WF and created by my user via MN21 according to the access method that include Plant-Function (§§)-Partner (My username)-Medium (1-Print output)-Date/time (3 Send with application own transaction)- language.</P><P>The result is: Once I use migo (mb31) for the goods receipt of production order, I have the label print automatically. Condition record is triggered. However, once I use control key confirmation and automatic goods receipt, I do not have any spool. </P><P>Question is: Do you have any advice for me which point should I change or add to have automatic barcode label after automatic goods receipt via control key?</P><P>Thanks in advance for your support.</P><P>**I have solved it: change the event type as WR. This one was the wrong point. </P><P> </P>2025-03-27T09:21:14.579000+01:00https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-q-a/connect-sap-4-7-to-sap-netweaver-gateway-as-a-hub-deployment/qaq-p/14067410Connect SAP 4.7 to SAP Netweaver Gateway as a Hub Deployment2025-04-06T01:57:14.415000+02:00yashoratnahttps://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/16294<P>Hi Everyone,</P><P>We have requirement to connect SAP 4.7 system with SAP NW gateway system (as a hub deployment). We are planning to expose o-data services through NW gateway system. But as a first step can we really connect SAP 4.7 with gateway 2.0 as 4.7 doesn't have netweaver components?</P><P>If not, then can we have webservice created in SAP 4.7 to expose the data to SAP UI5 applications?</P><P>Thank you in advance for your valuable input.</P>2025-04-06T01:57:14.415000+02:00https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/business-partner-as-leading-object-in-ecc/qaq-p/14079129Business Partner as leading object in ECC2025-04-17T15:08:53.799000+02:00Seb123https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1850351<P>Hello everyone,</P><P>I am currently working on a preproject for and S/4HANA conversion and in doing so we need to activate the CVI.</P><P>As you probably know usually the BP will only get activated technically as it is a prerequisite for the conversion and the customer/supplier remain the leading object while still on ECC.</P><P>My client now requests to use the Business Partner as the leading object on ECC already, but I cannot find any documentation on that, nor do I have any experience with it.</P><P>Does anyone of you know if it is even possible to make use of the Business Partner as Customer/Supplier before going to S/4HANA and what the consequences would this have on the ECC system?</P><P>Hope you can help me out with this, thanks in advance.</P><P> </P><P>Best regards,</P><P>Sebastian</P>2025-04-17T15:08:53.799000+02:00https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/storno-abrechnung-psp-elemente/qaq-p/14094977Storno Abrechnung PSP Elemente2025-05-07T07:31:15.638000+02:00Wissensdurst0812https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2108393<P>Hallo zusammen,</P><P>wir rechnen PSP-Elemente periodisch auf Anlagen ab. Aufgrund eines Mitarbeiterweggangs wurde diese Abrechnung über einen längeren Zeitraum versäumt. Nun haben wir eine Abrechnung für den aktuellen Monat gemacht und festgestellt, dass alte Perioden noch nicht abgerechnet wurden. Die alten Perioden lassen sich aber nicht abrechnen, weil schon Abrechnungen in Folgemonaten gelaufen sind. Ich bekomme diese Fehlermeldung: "Abrechnung vor AbrPeriode 002 2025 erst nach Stornierung möglich". Hat jemand einen Tipp, wie ich die alten Perioden abrechnen kann ohne die Abrechnungen der Folgemonate zu stornieren?</P><P>Danke euch!</P><P> </P>2025-05-07T07:31:15.638000+02:00https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/e2000-r-3-mm-mara-mfrnr-change-to-text-field/qaq-p/14165822E2000 R/3 MM MARA MFRNR change to text field?2025-07-29T15:22:27.586000+02:00Claudia123456https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2206439<P>Hello, </P><P>I just want to know, if it is possible to edit the Field MFRNR in order to be able to write alphanumerical input. </P>2025-07-29T15:22:27.586000+02:00https://community.sap.com/t5/financial-management-q-a/in-ke5z-report-krw-is-not-reporting-correctly/qaq-p/14174381IN KE5Z REPORT KRW IS NOT REPORTING CORRECTLY2025-08-07T09:54:00.573000+02:00Gourav_Deshmukhhttps://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2164533<P>SAP/PCA module with cash flow accounts in a company code in this closing in the transmission with decimal positions in these accounts and they reported incorrectly to PCA module/OS.</P><P>Movements and balances should be as per SAP in A30 KRW in the Asset Mmodule system where you can see for example in the raabga01 asset module report . However, they were reported with coma moved positions.</P><P>Example they should report 82,189,869 but in KE5z it is reporting 8,218,386,900<BR /><BR /></P>2025-08-07T09:54:00.573000+02:00https://community.sap.com/t5/enterprise-resource-planning-q-a/how-to-check-the-breakup-of-the-planned-value-of-goods-issue-of-production/qaq-p/14222829How to check the breakup of the Planned value of Goods Issue of production order2025-09-20T08:22:56.953000+02:00dhanotiyapankajhttps://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1552652<P>Dear All,</P><P>The planned value of the goods issue of the production order is far more than the actual value of Goods Issue resulting in variance. Kindly suggest how I can check the breakup of Goods issue planned value so as to detect and rectify the error in calculation of planned goods issue value.</P>2025-09-20T08:22:56.953000+02:00https://community.sap.com/t5/supply-chain-management-q-a/sap-error-m7018-wbs-element-input-required/qaq-p/14236292SAP Error M7018: WBS Element Input Required2025-10-07T07:01:49.621000+02:00MAME02https://community.sap.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2195380<P>Dear All,</P><P>In SAP S/4HANA, when registering a delivery document, the system unexpectedly prompts for a WBS element, even though the PS module is not being used in this process.</P><P>Could you please help me understand the possible reason or configuration that might cause this behavior?</P><P>Thank you in advance for your support.</P>2025-10-07T07:01:49.621000+02:00