SAP Community - SAP Risk Management

SAP FSCM Credit Scoring UKM_PARAMETERS Table

2022-07-06T16:45:02+02:00

Hello Experts,

Can someone tell me a way to increase number of score fields in credit risk monitor ,formula editor.

At present SAP has provided C_RATING_PT1 ...C_RATING_PT5.

I wan to add 2 more fields 6 and 7, does anyone know how to do it.

Thanks,

Bhavik

Upload G/L Account Determination for SAP Treasury and Risk Management

2022-08-19T13:09:53+02:00

Hello Team,

Can anyone help me with a template file to populate the account determination for SAP Treasury and Risk Management. Where can i get an excel template for this.

advance request for credit managment

2022-09-06T03:38:38+02:00

Dear Experts,

My client requirement is if each sale order level advances request will be generated if the advance amount not paid it has to block the payment . Can anyone explain how we can do this setting in credit management

Credit limit check for debit memo

2022-09-13T20:16:13+02:00

Dear experts,

We have set a credit limit for customers in FD32, we have only posted debit not with direct accounting entry to that customer but the system is checking the credit limit and it's not allowing when I create new sale order.

Please advise

Pleae find the reference screen shot

S4 HANA : Receivables Risk Management Configuration in SD

2022-10-13T16:34:31+02:00

S4 HANA states that credit management and letter of credit processing is now in FSCM. However, in the configuration nodes for basic functions--> Credit Management --> Receivables Risk Management there are configuration nodes that are still available.

The configuration table for forms of payment guarantee shows the following with S4 HANA

I would appreciate the inputs from experts in this forum on the following:

a. Is there an option to use Letter of credit processing without using FSCM in S4 HANA ?

b. Do we need to use these configuration nodes in any way if we are to use letter of credit processing with S4 HANA?

c. What is the intent of these configuration nodes under the sales and distribution module with S/4 HANA ?

Appreciate your feedback

Regards

Rohit Zalani

MENGE IS MISSING

2022-12-05T20:48:40+01:00

How we can solve issue

task is post & order cant

Fiori app "Monitor Issue Status" dont show any data

2023-02-08T13:12:39+01:00

Hi all

Can someone tell me which entity we need to enable in GRFN_API ?

If I enable all entities with activity * , I can see the data , but I cant use *.

Have enabled G_IS (ISSUE), but it dont help.

I will avoid using GRFN_USER=Display.

BR, Ståle

SAP Risk Management

2023-02-08T16:30:53+01:00

What is SAP Risk? Service, method or something else?

Best practice when creating new users in SAP

2023-02-20T17:48:08+01:00

What are the best practices when creating new users in SAP? We have development, QA, and production systems in place when testing new user accounts and roles does it make sense to work in development and then transport to them to production? Also when we have a mature system is it best to just create users in production?

Risk Aggregation with different currencies

2023-07-24T16:03:27+02:00

Dear community,

We would like to know how the consolidation of information is maintained, particularly during the aggregation of risks at the group level, in cases where we have multiple currencies across subsidiary organizations.

Also is there any GRC Table handling currencies conversion ? ( Like Tcurr)

Thanks you.

SAP Risk Management integration with Oracle

2023-09-04T16:12:32+02:00

Hi,

Does SAP Risk Management has functionality to integrate with Oracle ERP? or is it possible to use it as a standalone solution without there being core SAP S4 HANA modules implemented?

I have not been able to obtain clarity from SAP documentation on aforementioned points.

Thanks

GRC Risk Management Risk Analysis Currency

2024-02-28T08:22:19.164000+01:00

Hi All,

GRC RM 12, SP 20

Although the Org. has currency defined in INR, the Risk Analysis(using Quantitative Analysis profile) result shows in Euros. Can you please suggest as to how can the result be in INR.

Regards

Plaban

Customer LTSD Issue failing for certain countries

2024-04-05T00:23:35.960000+02:00

Team,

We implemented the Preference Processing module to be specific the Outbound customer C-LTSD's. We are facing an issue with issuing the LTSD's for two countries SouthKorea(KR) and Serbia. Any LTSD's for Invoices belonging to these two countries, the system is failing to issue the C-LTSD's. We noticed that when creating billing document for Customers from these two countries in the feeder system, the same is not transferring to GTS. In SLG1 we can see the transfer failing with the error - 'Legal Regulation is not Unique'. Message no. /SAPSLL/API_INBOUND060. Diagnosis details of the message says "The legal regulation cannot be determined uniquely for country key DK. Multiple legal regulations are active for country key DK and service of type Customs Processing". However manually transferring the document again via GTS cockpit (/SAPSLL/SD0C_RIMAR3) will transfer the billing document to GTS system and the same is visible in table ‘/SAPSLL/PREBDOC’, my understanding is this is the table from where the billing docs are picked for issuing the LTSD's. But ultimately when issuing the C-LTSD (Tcode - /SAPSLL/LTSDOUT_1) the program fails to issue ..its says '0 LTSDs were created', also the corresponding entry gets deleted from the table ‘/SAPSLL/PREBDOC’. This is a very strange behaviour. Please note that the issue is only faced with Invoices for only countries south Korea and Serbia, rest all countries the system is working as expected. Attached a snapshot of the error in Billing doc transfer.

Any pointers to solve this issue is highly appreciated. Please note I already check where there are any multiple country assignments for the Legal Regulations, but did not find any, so that cause can be ruled out.

Thanks,

Dhan

Embracing SAP Clean Core: A Strategic Imperative for Digital Transformation

2024-06-03T08:00:05.496000+02:00

In the rapidly evolving digital landscape, enterprises are constantly seeking ways to streamline operations, enhance agility, and drive innovation. SAP Clean Core emerges as a pivotal strategy in this quest, offering a path to a simplified, efficient, and future-ready enterprise core. This blog post explores the significance of SAP Clean Core, its alignment with SAP Activate methodology, the synergies with RISE with SAP, the transformative capabilities of S/4HANA, and the role of KTern.AI in facilitating this journey.

SAP Activate Methodology: The Blueprint for Success

The SAP Activate methodology is a flexible, agile framework designed to guide businesses through the implementation and deployment of SAP solutions. It encompasses best practices, guided configurations, and a clear methodology to ensure project success. By leveraging SAP Activate, organizations can accelerate their SAP S/4HANA implementations, ensuring a clean core that is devoid of unnecessary customizations and complexity.

RISE with SAP: Elevating Business Transformation

RISE with SAP is a comprehensive offering that simplifies the migration of ERP systems to the cloud. It encapsulates cloud solutions, infrastructure, and services, providing a seamless transition path. With RISE with SAP, businesses can benefit from embedded intelligence, real-time insights, and advanced technologies, all of which contribute to maintaining a clean core and fostering business resilience.

SAP S/4HANA: The Heart of Digital Transformation

At the core of the digital transformation journey lies SAP S/4HANA, SAP’s most advanced ERP suite. Designed to run on the in-memory SAP HANA database, SAP S/4HANA integrates functions from lines of business and industry solutions, offering unparalleled speed, simplicity, and efficiency. A clean core in SAP S/4HANA ensures that businesses can leverage real-time data processing and analytics, essential for informed decision-making and competitive advantage.

The Imperative of SAP Clean Core

A clean core is essential for businesses to adapt swiftly to changing market dynamics and customer expectations. It enables organizations to leverage the latest SAP product advancements and integrate new software releases promptly. Without a clean core, businesses face challenges such as increased operational costs, inflexibility, and technical debt, which can hinder innovation and growth.

Without a clean core, organizations may encounter several challenges:

Technical Challenges

Complex Upgrades: Customizations can complicate the upgrade process, leading to longer and more costly system updates
Reduced System Performance: A cluttered core with custom code can degrade system performance and reliability
Increased Technical Debt: Over time, customizations can accumulate, resulting in technical debt that hampers agility and innovation.
Integration Difficulties: Custom code can create dependencies that make it difficult to integrate with other systems or technologies.

Operational Challenges

Operational Instability: A non-standard core may lead to unpredictable system behavior and increased downtime
Compliance Risks: Deviations from standard configurations can pose risks to regulatory compliance and data integrity
Resource Intensiveness: Customized systems require more resources for maintenance and support

Strategic Challenges

Inhibiting Digital Transformation: A dirty core can hinder an organization’s ability to adapt to new business models and technologies.
Barriers to Innovation: Excessive customizations can limit the ability to leverage new SAP functionalities and innovations.
Change Management Difficulties: Transitioning to a clean core requires significant change management efforts, which can be challenging if the existing system is heavily customized.

In summary, not maintaining a clean core can lead to increased costs, reduced efficiency, and a lack of flexibility, which are detrimental to an organization’s digital transformation journey. It’s essential to adopt a strategic approach to ensure a clean core for long-term success and sustainability.

Organizations looking to clean up their SAP core can start by adopting a strategic approach that includes the following steps:

Assessment of Customizations: Begin with a thorough assessment of the existing system to identify all customizations, modifications, and enhancement.
Fit-to-Standard Analysis: Evaluate the necessity of each customization against the standard SAP S/4HANA capabilities. Retire any custom code that is no longer needed or can be replaced by standard functionality.
Leverage SAP Best Practices: Adopt SAP best practices and guided configurations to align with standard processes.
Use of SAP BTP for Extensions: Utilize SAP Business Technology Platform (SAP BTP) to build extensions rather than modifying the core system.
API-First Approach: Implement an API-first strategy to facilitate integration without altering the core system.
Continuous Monitoring and Optimization: Establish a process for ongoing monitoring and optimization to ensure the core remains clean and aligned with business needs.
Documentation and Governance: Maintain comprehensive documentation of all changes and establish strong governance to manage technical debt.

By following these steps, organizations can systematically clean up their SAP core, leading to a more streamlined, efficient, and agile system that is better equipped for the digital transformation journey.

Accelerating the Journey to a Clean Core with AI powered Automation

KTern.AI stands out as a digital transformation suite that aids in achieving a clean SAP core It offers digital tools for assessment, governance, process orchestration, testing, and optimization. With KTern.AI, businesses can plan risk-free SAP transformations, ensure productive governance, orchestrate SAP process lifecycles, and avoid disruptions during releases.

In conclusion, maintaining a clean core is not just a technical necessity; it is a strategic imperative that underpins the digital transformation journey. By embracing SAP Activate methodology, RISE with SAP, and SAP S/4HANA, and leveraging tools like KTern.AI, businesses can navigate the complexities of digital transformation with confidence and clarity

For more reading:

@https://blogs.sap.com/2023/07/01/clean-core-demystified-what-does-it-mean-and-how-to-achieve-it-with...

@ https://learning.sap.com/learning-journeys/practicing-clean-core-extensibility-for-sap-s-4hana-cloud...

Open/Add/Remove buttons Risk in Subprocess are disabled

2024-06-11T15:13:09.792000+02:00

Hi All,

GRC PC 12 SP24

Although the Subprocess is set 'yes' as Allow local changes, the Risks tab does not have the buttons Open/Add/Remove Risk enabled.

The above approach is recommended at https://help.sap.com/docs/SAP_PROCESS_CONTROL/f77342ea45c24d3f81032575e6f50d8b/75a39cfc4bc044c4aae3ef45a4969291.html?version=12.0.17 .

If i open the Risk templates(from Risk Catalog) and then assign a control, then also the control does not show the risk when opened from Central hierarchy

Can you please suggest as to how can a risk be assigned to a Control

Regards

Plaban

SAP GRC KRI for Percentage

2024-08-13T08:24:52.202000+02:00

Hello Risk Management Experts,

I need your expertise in an Automated KRI rules scenario where percentage is to be calculated

Scenario: The Table PA002 has the gender details of employees in the Field (GESCH) where the number 1 is for males and number 2 is for females. I need to build a KRI rule to check the percentage of Female employees and in the KRI rule if they are less than 26% flag it as a Risk.

Steps Completed:

1) Created KRI Template with value type as Numbers to be fetched from the table

2) Created a KRI implementation to fetch data from the table PA0002

3) Created a standard KRI in the Risk and added the values and did a Test Instance and it fetches the sum of the all the employees both males (1) and Females (2). Is there a way to get percentage of female employees here as a result which can then be checked against the threshold values.

The Data is being read from the system it currently has 13 employees with value 2 ( Females) and 35 employees with value 1 (Males)

Or a Business Rule has to be created, need your help to fetch the percentage so that it can be checked against the Threshold values. Am I missing something here, your advice is highly appreciated.

I'm working on xiting xams ruleset, we want to understand the logic of group concepts and operator

2025-04-30T08:39:31.947000+02:00

I'm working on xiting xams ruleset, we want to understand the logic of group concepts and logical operator works for the ruleset

we have a understanding that the ruleset works on the sequence of line items defined in the auth permission

help us with one of the example

Monitoring unmitigated users in SAP GRC

2025-05-26T12:21:56.210000+02:00

I want to achieve monitoring of unmitigated users based on selection criteria where it creates alerts in case some user is found with mitigation control not assigned.

Is there any standard program?

How to Swap Axes in Risk Matrix (Impact on X-axis, Probability on Y-axis) in SAP CPM Risk Management

2025-10-30T10:22:13.652000+01:00

Hi everyone,

I'm currently working with the Risk Management module in SAP Commercial Project Management (CPM), and I have a question regarding the Risk Matrix visualization.

By default, the matrix displays Probability on the X-axis and Impact on the Y-axis. However, for our internal reporting, we need to swap the axes — that is, show Impact on the X-axis and Probability on the Y-axis.

I have a few questions:

Is there a standard configuration or setting in SAP CPM or Fiori apps that allows this axis swap?
If not, has anyone implemented a custom Fiori app or enhancement to achieve this?
Are there any BADIs or extension points available in the Risk Matrix component that could help with customizing the layout?
Would exporting the data and visualizing it externally (e.g., in SAC or Power BI) be the most practical workaround?

Any guidance, documentation links, or shared experiences would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks in advance,
Febin DS

Clarification Needed: How SAP CPM Risk Management Determines Positive vs. Negative Impact Values

2025-10-30T12:01:53.171000+01:00

Hi everyone,

I'm working with the Risk Management module in SAP Commercial Project Management (CPM) and have a question regarding how the system handles impact values for Risks and Opportunities.

Scenario:

Under Risk Impact configuration, I’ve defined values for:

Cost
Schedule
Scope
Quality

Each of these has both positive and negative values configured.

Observation:

When I register a Risk in the Fiori app, the system only shows the negative values.
When I register an Opportunity, it only shows the positive values.

Question:

How does the system determine which values to show? Where is this behavior defined?

From what I’ve gathered:

The values are configured with positive or negative signs in simg > commercial project management > Master Data > Risk Management > Define risk Impact
The system seems to filter based on the sign of the value and the type of record (Risk vs. Opportunity).
However, I couldn’t find a specific SPRO configuration node or BAdI that controls this logic.

Is this behavior hardcoded in the Fiori app or backend logic?
Are there any enhancement points or customizing options to influence this filtering?

Any insights or documentation references would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks in advance,
Febin DS