SAP Community - SAP S/4HANA Public Cloud

Order To cash Dashboard Profit Center filter not available

2026-07-17T10:45:43.130000+02:00

Not able to filter based on Profit Centre in Order To Cash Dashboard. Also the data follows Calendar Year instead of Fiscal year. in the Order to Cash Dashboard in Public Cloud.

Inspection lot sample size calculation based on manually entered carton quantity

2026-07-17T11:01:10.254000+02:00

Hi experts,

We have a requirement in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition related to QM sampling.

At goods receipt, users manually enter the actual carton quantity. For example:

GR quantity: 1000 PCS
Actual cartons: 9 CTN (stored as batch characteristic or custom field)

In the inspection plan, we have an inspection characteristic for outer carton inspection. The expectation is that the sample size should be calculated based on the carton quantity (e.g. 9 CTN), not the inspection lot quantity (1000 PCS).

However, standard sampling seems to always use the inspection lot quantity, and alternative units require a fixed conversion, which we do not have (carton quantity varies per GR).

We would like to confirm:

Is it possible in standard S/4HANA Cloud to calculate sample size based on a manually entered carton quantity?
Can sampling be driven by batch characteristics or custom fields?
If not, is this a standard limitation?
Are there any recommended approaches (e.g. physical samples, sample-drawing procedures, etc.)?

Expected result: sample size for carton inspection is based on 9 CTN instead of 1000 PCS.

Thanks in advance for your help!

Can we send the current user email address in a SAP FIELD parameter in the outbound OCI interface?

2026-07-17T11:48:28.692000+02:00

We are using the Fiori app Settings for Web Services (F1994) to define a punch out catalogue to Amazon Business. Amazon Business require the email address of the user punching out to the catalogue. Is the user email address available in the list of SAP Field parameters in the call structure? If not, is there a BADI to add this in?

Payment Reference field to be display in Approve Bank Payments App

2026-07-17T12:05:34.238000+02:00

Hello SAP,

May we ask if its possible to include "Payment Reference" field in Apprve Bank Payments app?

SAP S/4HANA Public Cloud – Engineering Change Management (ECM) Workflow for BOM Approval and Mass BO

2026-07-17T13:25:29.151000+02:00

Hi Experts,

We are currently implementing SAP S/4HANA Public Cloud and are evaluating the standard Engineering Change Management (ECM) process for Bill of Material (BOM) changes.

Our customer has the following business requirement, and we would like to understand the best practice in SAP Public Cloud.

Current Business Requirement

Any change to a BOM should go through only one approver.
The approver should be able to review the actual BOM changes (for example, component replacement, quantity change, addition/deletion of components) before approving.
Once approved, the changes should become effective on the defined effective date.

Additionally, the customer frequently performs mass BOM changes (similar to transaction CS20 in SAP ECC/On-Premise), where a single component is replaced or updated across multiple BOMs.

Observation in Standard Change Record Process

While testing the standard Change Record process in SAP S/4HANA Public Cloud (Discrete Industry Change), we observed the following workflow:

Create Change Record.
Submit Change Request.
Approval.
Start Implementation.
Change Number is generated.
Implement BOM changes.
Close Implementation.

Based on this flow, it appears that the Change Number is generated only after the approval and Start Implementation step.

This means the engineer cannot modify the BOM under the Change Number before the approver has approved the request.

Our Questions

Is this the standard behavior in SAP S/4HANA Public Cloud?
If yes, does the approver only approve the engineering request rather than the actual BOM modifications?
Is there any standard process that allows the approver to review the proposed BOM changes before approval?
Is it possible to configure the workflow so that:
- the Change Number is available before approval,
- the engineer prepares the BOM changes,
- and the approver reviews the modified BOM before approving and releasing it?
If this is not supported in the standard Public Cloud process, what is the SAP-recommended approach for customers who require approval of the actual engineering changes rather than only the request?

Mass BOM Changes

The customer also performs mass BOM changes similar to CS20 in SAP ECC.

We understand that CS20 is not available in SAP S/4HANA Public Cloud.

Our questions are:

What is the SAP-recommended approach for mass BOM updates in Public Cloud?
Should the process be:
- Create Change Record
- Approval
- Execute Mass Maintenance
- Release
Or is there another recommended workflow that maintains engineering traceability and approval?
Which standard Fiori apps should be used together with ECM for controlled mass BOM changes?

We would appreciate guidance on the SAP best practice for implementing this requirement while staying as close as possible to the standard Public Cloud functionality.

How to receive & pick full and partial boxes in sap public cloud

2026-07-17T13:47:30.828000+02:00

Business has requirement to receive and pick full and partial carton boxes. How can we configure in sap public cloud?

Is any solution available?

How to set up free of charge purchase item in public cloud

2026-07-17T13:55:23.391000+02:00

It is possible to tick the box Free of charge in the purchase order to order a free of charge item. I have a requirement of my customer to always purchase free of charge item.

What is the suggested solution here?

I tried the following:
1. Add an info record with 0, but I get the error:
Net price must be greater than 0 Row: Condition Type: PPR0

2. Implement BADI Change of Purchase Requisition Item:
IF purchaserequisitionitem-material = 'XXX.
PURCHASEREQUISITIONITEMCHANGE-INVOICEISEXPECTED = ''.

But unfortunately, this does set the flag in the purchase requisition

GR Label Printing Based on “Number of Labels” Field

2026-07-17T15:26:32.259000+02:00

Hi Team,

Currently, the GR label printing process generates labels based on the received quantity. For example, if a line item has a quantity of 100, the system automatically prints 100 labels.

The client would like to change this behavior so that the number of labels printed is determined by the “Number of Labels” field entered by the user, rather than the received quantity.

Example:

Quantity = 100
Number of Labels = 2

Expected Result:

The system should print 2 labels only, based on the value entered in the “Number of Labels” field.

In summary, the label printing logic should be controlled by the “Number of Labels” field, enabling users to specify exactly how many labels need to be printed for each GR line item.

Please advise on the feasibility of implementing this requirement and the recommended approach.

Thanks & Regards,
Kiran

Check number is not updating in Assignment filed of Gl line items

2026-07-17T16:30:36.045000+02:00

Hi Team,

We are facing a challenge while reconciling the bank with the General Ledger (GL). The check number is not being updated in the Assignment field of the GL line item, which is making the reconciliation process difficult.

I could not find any relevant SAP Notes or documentation in SAP S/4HANA Cloud that explains how to populate the check number in the Assignment field.

Could you please let us know if there is a standard way to achieve this or if any configuration or enhancement is required?

Thank you for your support.

Regards,

Inthiyaz Shaik

Incorrect VAT reporting date transferred from SD to FI in Public Cloud

2026-07-17T16:41:11.421000+02:00

We are experiencing issues with the derivation of the Tax Reporting Date in accounting documents generated from SD billing documents in the Hungarian localization of SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition 2602.

According to the SAP documentation, the Tax Reporting Date and Tax Fulfilment Date can be derived via the configuration activity Define Derivation Rules for Business Transactions.

We found several scenarios in which the standard logic seems to produce incorrect dates.

1. Cancellation invoice

The derivation rule for normal invoices (OINV) is configured to use the fulfilment date for both tax dates. A normal invoice is created with a service rendered date of 30 June and cancelled on 7 July.

The generated FI document receives a Tax Reporting Date of 30 June, while according to Hungarian legislation we would expect the cancellation posting date (7 July).

Invoice date problem.docx

2. Collective invoice

For collective invoices, Hungarian regulations require both the Tax Reporting Date and the Tax Fulfilment Date to be derived from the latest fulfilment date among the referenced deliveries.

However, our debugging indicates that the fulfilment date is determined by class CL_FULFILLDATE_SERVICE, while the VAT date is determined by BAdI implementation CL_IM_IM_FULFILLMENT_ACC. In our tests, one date is taken from the first invoice item and the other from the last invoice item.

Invoice date problem.docx

3. Final invoice with down payment

For a final invoice containing a down-payment clearing item, the system seems to use the derivation rule maintained for OPERIO, although the business process is not a periodic settlement.

In our example, the final invoice receives:

Tax Reporting Date: 30.06.2026
Tax Fulfilment Date: 08.09.2026

while both dates should be 10.07.2026 according to our understanding of Hungarian VAT rules.

Invoice date problem.docx

Questions

Has anyone encountered similar behavior in the Hungarian localization of SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition?
Is this the intended standard behavior, or is it considered a defect?
Are there SAP Notes or recommended configuration settings that address these scenarios?
Is there any official guidance regarding the legal interpretation of these invoice types in Hungary?

API_MRP_MATERIALS_SRV_01

2026-07-17T18:17:52.349000+02:00

Hello,In S/4HANA Public Cloud, I need to retrieve Material Planning data and consume it in a custom BTP application intended for deployment in the public cloud.While researching the available options, I identified the following API as the appropriate one for this use case:Plain TextAPI_MRP_MATERIALS_SRV_01I was able to successfully retrieve the data using Postman. However, when I added this service to the manifest.json file of the BTP app project and attempted to deploy the app, I encountered an error stating that the usage of this service is forbidden in this context.Based on my investigation, the issue appears to be that this service is configured as an inbound service, whereas my intended use case requires it to be configured as outbound.Could you please advise on the following:Is there a way to resolve this error and correctly enable outbound usage of this service?Alternatively, is there a released Data Definition (e.g., a CDS view or equivalent API) that exposes the same Material Planning data and supports outbound consumption?Thank you in advance for your help.Best regards,

Commodity Code values not displayed in CDS view I_PURCHASEORDERITEMAPI01

2026-07-17T23:26:30.537000+02:00

The commodity code values from purchase orders are not displayed in CDS view I_PURCHASEORDERITEMAPI01.

"Amount in Global Currency" field with ZERO value

2026-07-18T12:51:02.445000+02:00

While reporting on journal entries transactions, the "amount in global currency" field returns zero value.

--- Steps to Reproduce ---

Open "Display Line Items in General Ledger " App
Some Transactions return a Zero Value in the "Amount in Global Currency" field.

Unable to edit highest fiscal period to 2027 from 2027 from ledger setting

2026-07-18T15:07:01.614000+02:00

Unable to change highest fiscal period from ledger setting. How this fiscal year can edited to 2026 from 2027?

Sap - Procurement

2026-07-19T03:02:05.993000+02:00

Does anyone knows how to get the sap live practice system that looks the same but it like the testing system before going live?

Successor of Run Balance Interest Calculation (T-Code F.52) for G/L in S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition.

2026-07-19T07:07:00.371000+02:00

We are currently implementing SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition and require clarification regarding Balance Interest Calculation for G/L Accounts.

In SAP S/4HANA Private Edition / On-Premise, transaction F.52 (Balance Interest Calculation) was available to calculate interest on G/L account balances, which was commonly used for calculating Running Finance / Running Markup on financing accounts.

We would like to ask the following:

What is the standard alternative to Transaction F.52 in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition?
Has this functionality been replaced by another Fiori application, background job, or standard process?
If there is no direct replacement, what is the SAP-recommended approach for calculating Running Finance (interest/markup on G/L balances) in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition?
Does SAP recommend using any standard functionality from Treasury, Bank Account Interest Management, or another component for this business requirement?
If this functionality is not available in the standard Public Cloud solution, is there any recommended extensibility approach or best practice that SAP suggests?

Our business requirement is to calculate periodic financing charges (running finance/markup) based on the outstanding balance of a G/L account.

We would appreciate your guidance on the recommended standard solution and SAP best practices for this requirement in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition.

Thank you for your support.

Kind regards,

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn more about the SAP Support user and program here.

如何通过加密厂商北京前沿信安科技股份有限公司的前置Proxy登陆S4 Public Cloud

2026-07-19T15:16:08.163000+02:00

咨询如何通过加密厂商 北京前沿信安科技股份有限公司 的前置Proxy登陆S4 Public Cloud，希望了解相关流程和注意事项，以及相关成功案例，非常感谢。

France Statutory Payment Issue

2026-07-20T09:21:08.718000+02:00

We have a business requirement to populate the SGTXT field information under the <Ustrd> tag based on the 'YA' document type. If the document type other than 'YA' then the value should pick from the 'XBLNR' field. Currently we do not have standard solution from SAP, we would need to create the custom logic.

BAdi MMPUR_WORKFLOW_AGENTS_V2 not working for RFQ

2026-07-20T09:25:44.470000+02:00

Hi Team,

We are trying to implement Badi MMPUR_WORKFLOW_AGENTS_V2 for RFQ where we are not able to identify the step Info,

We know it is clearly mentioned in the note 2646400 , do have any anyother way to implement this Badi.

In RFQ we are trying to identify the Agent based on Position ID coming from Successfactor system

About planning calendar

2026-07-20T09:56:36.801000+02:00

What is the reason that the creation of planning calendars is not possible in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition?