SAP Community - SAP Supply Chain Management

Intercompany stock transfer what happens when a lower of higher amount reaches the other warehouse?

2025-12-30T09:59:09.767000+01:00

(5hp) Situation: S4 public cloud -> EWM -> third party warehouse.
The third party warehouse sends a message that goes into S4 through Boomi.
This should fill in the put away quantity.
We will then use a job to post goods receipt.

Problem what if less or more stock arrives at the third party warehouse?
How can we close the NBIC order? What happens to the stock in transit?

Brief Explain to Split valuation concept in SAP public cloud ?

2026-01-05T12:11:11.016000+01:00

Brief Explain to Split valuation concept in SAP public cloud ?

Based on the Price, Origin, Quality ??

Create delivery with multiple STO

2026-01-05T14:54:53.175000+01:00

Hi experts,

We'd like to create a single delivery (VL10B or VL10D) with multiple STOs (same product, source and destination).

Is there any way to have it?

We tried to follow the steps mentioned at SAP NOTE 2172388 (2172388 - Stock transport orders (STO) are not combined into one delivery - SAP ERP & SAP S/4HANA | SAP Knowledge Base Article) but it didn't work.

Is there any idea if it is possible?

The intention is to have as below:

Delivery A - Item 1 - (STO 1 - Item 1)
Delivery A - Item 2 - (STO 2 - Item 1)
Delivery A - Item 3 - (STO 3 - Item 1)

We have already set the parameters at transaction VTLA as below:

Thanks a lot!

Best regards!

Victor Leao

Shipping point issue in Return to Vendor

2026-01-07T11:05:05.631000+01:00

Hello All,

My Enterprise structure-

Plant - P001

Sales Org - S001

Distribution channels - D1 (Domestic), D2 (Import)

Division - 00

Plant is linked to both S001,D1 and S001,D2

Now we are trying to create a Return to Vendor order and we are getting the error No shipping point could be determined for Shipping condition , Loading Group 001, Plant P001.

Our supplier is extended to two sales areas S001, D1,00 and S001,D2,00 . But this supplier is an Import supplier hence S001,D2,00 is the one of concern here. Shipping condition in this Sales Area is marked as Z1. However in the error we could see that the Shipping condition determined is blank.
Is this because in the SPRO configuration “Shipping data for plant”, the Sales area for our plant P001 is updated as S001,D1,00.

Is it due to this configuration that the system is trying to search the shipping condition for S001,D1,00 in the BP? Because for this sales area, the shipping condition is blank.

Need advise on how to handle this ?

How system make to consider planned delivery time into SFG/FG Prod Order's Start date and end date

2026-01-09T11:13:15.459000+01:00

In SAP public cloud, there is requirement to consider the planned delivery time of raw material while creating planned order post MRP run. The current system is not taking the raw material delivery into consideration.

SAP Practice and Get a Certificate

2026-01-11T10:22:38.178000+01:00

I have recently completed the course “Exploring Charges and Settlement in SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management” and successfully passed all quizzes at the end of each module. The course status on my SAP Learning account is marked as “Completed.”

However, I would like to kindly clarify the following points:

I am unable to access a practice environment to apply what I have learned. Could you please advise whether this course includes any hands-on system access, or if there is a recommended practice system (such as a trial or learning tenant) for SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management?
I have not received or found any downloadable certificate or record of completion. Could you please confirm whether this course provides a certificate (or statement of completion), and if so, where it can be accessed within the SAP Learning platform?

If this course does not include a certificate by default, I would also appreciate guidance on the appropriate SAP certification path related to SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management.

Thank you very much in advance for your support and guidance.

Kind regards,
Gandab Valiyeva

In MTO, Sequent ion of Material Production is not well defined, it depends on Raw Material Quality.

2026-01-11T14:44:02.293000+01:00

In MTO, For a single FG production, There are four stages at SFG levels production to be executed then FG Production is carried out.

At FG,

1. Packing

At SFG Levels,

1. Drawing operation (Material code 1)

2. Drawing Operation (Material Code 2)

3. Annealing Operation (Material Code 3 )

4. Grinding Operation (Material Code 4)

Based on Raw Material Quality, it is decided which combination is to be performed whether to perform (grinding & Packing

)/(Annealing, Grinding & Packing). Please suggest how to let system make to understand that particular sets of production/planned orders are to be performed. As after MRP Run Planned Orders will be created at each levels of BOM Components then how planned order will be treated in this case and which are not required to perform actually real time scenarios and consumption of Raw material directly getting consumed in Grinding and then in Packing consumption.

Remaining Planned orders & Production order, how it will be treated in real time for the order which is not required to perform and the material consumption which can be directly consumed at any stages based on requirement.

Issue with shipping point during Return To Vendor

2026-01-12T11:21:59.608000+01:00

We have one Plant - VP01

This plant is assigned to two sales areas VS01/10/00 and VS02/20/00 where 10 is for Direct Sales and 20 is for Export Sales.

Now when we are creating a return to the Export Vendor (BP extended to Sales area VS01/20/00 alone), we are getting the shipping point determination error because the system is searching for the shipping conditions in Sales area VS01/10/00 because in the “Shipping data for plant” configuration, my plant has sales area VS01/10/00 maintained.

Now as this is an export vendor, we don’t extend it to sales areas VS01/10/00. Hence we are unable to perform the returns at all.

So can anyone suggest how we can handle this case? Because we can’t keep changing the SPRO configuration Shipping data for plants again and again.

Should we implement any custom logic or can this be solved by standard SAP?

Variant Configuration – Subassembly BOM items with selection conditions not exploding in CU51

2026-01-13T14:22:33.145000+01:00

Hi everyone,

I am struggling with a variant configuration issue in a multi‑level BOM and would really appreciate some guidance.

I have created a configurable material with a characteristic ZS5_LT that represents the length of a ladder.
In the BOM of this configurable material, I have several ladder components, each with a selection condition, for example:

4.4 m ladder: selection condition ZS5_LT = 4.4
other ladders with similar conditions, depending on the value of ZS5_LT.

When I test this material in transaction CU50, everything works as expected:
If I set ZS5_LT = 4.4, the 4.4 m ladder is selected correctly in the result.

However, my problem occurs when I use this configurable material as a subassembly in another assembly.

Scenario:

The configurable material is inserted as a component in a higher‑level assembly in the BOM.
In CSKB / CU51, I select the configurable subassembly, enter the configuration there, and set ZS5_LT = 4.4 m.
Then I press “Result” or go back to the BOM view and expect to see the 4.4 m ladder under the configurable subassembly.

What actually happens:

No ladder is selected at all under the configurable subassembly when the selection condition is active.
If I remove the selection condition from the 4.4 m ladder item in the BOM, the ladder appears in CU51 as a static component.
So the BOM explosion for the subassembly works, but the selection condition based on ZS5_LT is not evaluated as I expect in the order BOM context.

My understanding is that this might be related to multi‑level configuration and how characteristics are evaluated at different levels (parent vs. subassembly). It looks like the system is looking for the characteristic higher up in the structure, but the characteristic is only defined and used for the configurable material.

Any hints, best practices, or example setups for this kind of multi‑level configuration with a configurable subassembly in CU51 would be very helpful.

Thank you in advance!

Catch Weight Management in Receiving Process

2026-01-13T17:50:09.438000+01:00

I have set up Catch Weight Management in my On Prem S/HANA box 2022 release 107.

I have all configuration and master data in place which is allowing me to manage parallel units of measure in handling units and storage bins.

I have only been able to capture the valuation quantity during packing of my inbound delivery in PRDI. Once the valuation quantity is measured against each HU am I able to goods receipt and create putaway tasks for my handling units.

My WPT has the field "Valuation Quantity Input Required for WT Confirmation" (/SCWM/T333-CWMEAS) checked.

I have read note 3297858 which advises of a restriction in RFUI processing for catch weight products, the resolution proposes to use RF Putaway. I have tried confirming my putaway WT in PTHUSI but there is nothing appearing for capturing the valuation quantity.

I have seen a YouTube video of an RFUI screen being able to capture this information but I'm not sure if it has been developed or if it is a standard screen.

Does anyone know if there is a way of being able to record valuation quantities in RFUI for Catch Weight products in Embedded EWM without a new Catch Weight screen being development?

Thanks in advance

Mike

In MTO, SO field in Planned/Purchase Req. is taking quotation/Inquiry no. of Reference Sales Order

2026-01-15T18:00:41.104000+01:00

Hello Team,

In MTO scenarios, the generated Planned order/ Purchase Requisition number having the account assignment section where Sales Order field is available is taking the reference of Inquiry or Quotation number for the respective Sales Order. It also results in impacting the report of sales Order based output details.

As per business requirment, the client is expecting the output based on the Sales Order not on the basis of Inquiry/Quotation number for Assigned Sales Order. Please suggest how to map the scenario to get the desired result output, without impacting the other modules fundamental concepts like as Costing, Delivery and all. Also, suggest the advantages and disadvantages of the other functionalities.

Export Vendor returns

2026-01-19T14:08:50.394000+01:00

Our plant is assigned to two sales areas

VNS1/10/00 - Domestic Sales
VNS1/20/00 - Export Sales

The sales area maintained in the SPRO “Define Shipping data for Plant” is VNS1/10/00 (only one sales area can be maintained at a time here and it is a TR config)

Now when there is a vendor returns performed for Domestic Vendors, the system is trying to fetch the “shipping conditions” from the Sales area VNS1/10/00 in the BP master and everything is working fine.

Now when there is a vendor returns performed for Export Vendors, the system is again trying to fetch the “shipping conditions” from the Sales area VNS1/10/00 and it fails because the Export BP is extended only to VNS1/20/00. Thus we are unable to perform any export returns.

Have you come across such scenarios in your projects? If yes, how can we resolve this?

Spec2000 Purchase Req Report?

2026-01-19T16:48:23.696000+01:00

Is there an SAP Purchase Req report that will show Spec200 / SC Order Priority data? ME5A does not appear to show this field. This is needed to track my open aging PRs by priority status.

PM-Revisions not seen in OIOB

2026-01-23T13:46:36.755000+01:00

I created a revision using OIOB t-code and I can see the entry in the table, T352R.

However, I cant see the same entry when I go back to OIOB. There are no entries there.

How do I resolve this?

Thanks and Regards,

Anirudh

Alerts for BOP job failure

2026-01-28T11:00:33.508000+01:00

Hi Dear experts

We need your input on setting up email alerts for BOP jobs.

In our S/4 system, we run Sales Order ATP using a scheduled BOP job created through the Schedule BOP Run app. Occasionally, these BOP jobs fail for different reasons, but no failure alerts are being triggered. We discussed this with our Basis team, and they concluded that because the job is not created through the SAP GUI and is considered a dynamic job, alerts cannot be configured.

Given that this is a business‑critical job, we would like your guidance on whether there is any way to receive alerts when the BOP job fails.

Technical RFC: Building an "Auditable Autopilot" for Material Shortages – Where is the real Excel He

2026-01-29T15:37:07.353000+01:00

Hi everyone,

I’m an AI developer in Germany architecting a "Human-in-the-loop" agent to automate exception handling for discrete manufacturers (Mittelstand).

The goal is to reduce the 4+ hours of manual coordination that happens when a supplier is late or a carrier delay occurs, leading to potential line stops. We are focusing on a safe, auditable "exception autopilot" model rather than a generic "digital brain."

I have a few "reality check" questions for the consultants and experts here. I need brutal honesty so I don't build a product that fails in a real German factory environment:

The 'Shadow' System: When a delay hits, does the rescheduling happen in SAP (e.g., MD04/CO06) immediately, or do planners usually run a 'Shadow Excel' for 1-2 days first to figure out the impact?
The Data Gap: What’s the one piece of information that is never in SAP (e.g., real-time carrier GPS, unstructured email updates) that forces a human to manually 'bridge' the gap?
The 'Green Button' Barrier: If an AI drafted the SAP update and the supplier email, what is the #1 reason a German Plant Manager would not press 'Approve'? (e.g., legal liability, lack of audit trail, trust issues).
On-Premise vs. Cloud: For a mid-sized manufacturer, would the IT department demand this system runs 100% on-premise for data sovereignty, or is a highly controlled cloud connection (like SAP BTP) acceptable now in 2026?

Looking forward to the insights from the community so we can build something that actually solves the real pain points.

Thanks in advance for your expertise!

Email Notification for PO approvers in sap s4hana public cloud

2026-02-06T08:45:51.922000+01:00

Hi All,

I have configured

Workflow configured for PO - With Notification for Approved and Rejected PO.

Define Allowed Email Sender Domains For Email Outbound - @******.com Maintained.

Define Allowed Email Receiver Domains For Email Outbound - @******.com Maintained.

In sap screen inbox its Purchase Order came for approval. But No mail has been triggered.

E mail template:

1) YY1_00800238_CRT_ALL - For Approvers to Approve PO

2) YY1_MMPUR_PO_WFL_APPROVAL - For PO created user - PO approved

3) YY1_MMPUR_PO_WFL_REJECTION - For PO created User - PO Rejected

In manage workforce also checked mail Id is maintained.

PO came for approval in approver's inbox and but mail is not triggering.

Also checked in "Monitor Email Transmission" app for test mail, there Status is Sent but again mail not received.

Kindly suggest a solution for this issue.

With Regards,

GOGUL

No transfer of interval 4000000000 4000000020 for object BU_PARTNER

2026-02-20T09:12:19.774000+01:00

Hello Experts

I got an error while creating Business partner(BP) having details as given below

Create in BP role – 000000 Business Partner (Gen)

Grouping – 0001 Int Number Assignment

Error message: No transfer of interval 4000000000 4000000020 for object BU_PARTNER

Please let me know what caused this error and how should it be resolved.

Rework Production order, its component level price distribution from Purchased material.

2026-02-20T16:10:39.899000+01:00

There is requirement to dismantle the product into its component that becomes saleable product for the business. The component which is received through 531 movement types, are getting sale through creating sale order.

The business wants that the price of Product which has been purchase from outside at Moving average price will go under dismantling and its price should be distributed percentage wise to its several components materials assign in the BOM of hypothetical material code, Because of Rework production order creation through CO07, how the price is distributed to its components material codes. Kindly suggest how it can be mapped in real time scenarios.

On production order release, two storage locations stock should e considered as available stock

2026-02-23T15:28:20.275000+01:00

In SAP Public cloud, there is requirement that Bom Components material should consider the two storage location available stock in the system. Based on that system should release the Created production order. Also, it should be applicable to mass production order release transaction T-Codes as well. Kindly suggest how the system consider 2 Storage Location available stock during checking the stock/Material availability check.