SAP Community - Settlement Management

Settlement error KD574

2024-02-15T17:47:37.434000+01:00

How do i solve settlement error KD574, when a credit memo is charged against the project?

Setlement internal orders to different GL accounts

2024-02-21T11:29:40.988000+01:00

Hi everybody!

I have one internal order, which setled to two GL Accounts according sourse assingment. Source assingment has one GL Account 9000001. GL account 9000001 has saldo more than zero and two cost center 01-01 and 01-02. I need to settle amount from GL account 9000001 with documents, which has cost center 01-01 to GL Account 700001 and settle amount from GL account 900001 to GL Account 800001 with documents, which has cost center 01-02.

Somebady knows does exist that customizing decision or may be use-exit or enhancement ?

Condition contract settlement accrual reversal: total value on first line item

2024-02-22T11:51:00.232000+01:00

Dear Experts,

I perform the condition contract settlement of a customer condition contract in WB2R_SC

We are using EHP with all activated business functions and customizing is consistent with documentation from note 2723516.

I have accruals that should be reversed with the settlement. We have multiple line items and I created accruals on line item (for all articles system created accruals with every invoice). Now performing the settlement, the system determines the correct value of accruals and reverses them. On header level it looks good. But on item level it does not: System puts the accrual reversal REA2 in total on the first line item. So i have a huge accrual reversal on the first line item and no accrual reversals on the other line items.

From finance perspective this is not an issue but it does in controlling CO-PA, because the full accrual reversal is on one line / item. Example with dummy data below:

How can we achieve that system puts accrual reversal on those articles / line items, where it build the accruals ? and not everything on the first item ?

Thanks and best regards

SAP S/4HANA for enterprise contract management Settlement Management

Condition Contract - Transfer of settlement documents to COPA

2024-03-06T19:51:39.609000+01:00

Good morning,

I have reviewed SAP Note 2997203 - Transfer of WBRK settlement documents to COPA, and I have also attempted to execute program RWLF2063 to transfer an item to COPA, also tried the RWLF2065. However, the program does not execute. Upon debugging, I observed that the process stops at the function COPA_DOCUMENT_CHECK_START, specifically at the following point:

LOOP AT t_accit TRANSPORTING NO FIELDS
          WHERE awtyp EQ <row_acchd>-awtyp
            AND awref EQ <row_acchd>-awref
            AND aworg EQ <row_acchd>-aworg
*            AND NOT paobjnr IS INITIAL.
            AND paobjnr <> if_fco_copa_paobjnr=>c_init 
            AND paobjnr <> if_fco_copa_paobjnr=>c_zero.
          EXIT.
        ENDLOOP.

This occurs because the PAOBJNR field is initial. The error message received is "Document with unauthorized business transaction 'SD00'", KE/AD - 604. In the configuration, it is set to go to COPA in document 0S12, under Settlement Management, Settlement Documents, and Settlement Document Types. I have set Profitability Analysis as "Active apart from.." and also tried with "Active", but encountered the same error. Additionally, in pricing A10005, I have included condition Y005, which is the same as used in billing documents, and set it as statistical, as per KE4I settings, but it still did not work.

Anyone has this scenario using condition contract + COPA? How did you manage to transfer the documents?

Total Business Volume RBVT getting summed at header level in contrast to REBV

2024-03-12T14:38:18.901000+01:00

Hello Colleagues,

we would like to use scales across mutliple clients in Multi-Customer condition contract type with the help of RBVT condition that SAP advises to add and a new scale base formula that refers to RBVT as scale basis of RES1.

Now the pricing at tem level of a settlement document looks correct:

However, at header level total business volume is resulted as the sum of item values:

We expect it to behave, similar as REBV at header level:

The wrong value of RBVT at header level leads to wrong %-Scale determination.

So the RES1 gets overwritten at header level after the correct calculation in the first place and re-distributed at item level.

Any ideas what is misisng here? Or some pricing procedure has to be maintained for RBVT to corrcet such behaviour?

Business Place determination to Settlement Management from Source Billing document

2024-03-16T06:57:53.636000+01:00

Hi Expert,

My client has requirement to configure Settlement Management in which there is a requirement to determine Business Place from source billing document to settlement document. There is an information about this in SAP help portal but it is not very clear.

Can you please help in configuration step or BADI to achieve Business Place determination in Settlement document.

Thanks in advance

Prasant Ray

Error in Condition Contract Settlement Pricing DIFF Condition types for Rounding off the Gross Value

2024-03-17T21:05:09.110000+01:00

Hello Experts,
We have requirement to round off the Gross Value (Net Value + Tax) of pricing for that We are using standard condition type DIFF (Round Off) with Requirement Routine 13, Alt Condition type 16 and Alt Condition Value 4 in settlement pricing procedure.
When we are creating settlement document system is giving error: A Balance of INR 0.20- exists in document 0000001. Error: WS(Settlement Management) Message no. 123
We are unable to resolve the error since we are using standard condition type and routine.
Request your help in resolving the error which will be highly appreciable.
Regards
Prashant Ray

Error Replication:
User getting the Gross amount INR 120, 000.01 which we want round off to INR 120,000.00

Applied standard Condition type DIFF with standard pricing routines 13, 16 & 4

While creating Settlement getting error.

Settle WBS to Cost Center : Missing Transaction Currency value

2024-03-25T10:37:04.948000+01:00

We are using KE5Z for a couple of reports

When we perform CJ88 from WBS To Cost Center as settlement rule, we should have :

1 - Controlling area value : OK, well populated

2 - Object currency / Company Code currency : OK, well populated

3 - Transaction Currency : Not populated at all.

Since Object currency = Controlling Area Currency, is there a way to automatically populate the transaction currency as well (value equal to object currency)

Thanks

Stéphane

Tax departure country/Reg and Tax destination Country/Reg in Settlement document

2024-03-28T12:33:48.095000+01:00

Hello Experts,

We would like to populate the Tax departure country/Reg and Tax destination Country/Reg in Settlement document for Tax purpose.

Thank you for your assistance.

Thanks and Regards,

Pankaj

Please

Condition Contract Change Report

2024-03-28T12:39:55.422000+01:00

Hello Experts,

We would like to understand is there any Fiori tile or transaction where we can see the changes against the condition contract.

Thank you for your assistance.

Thanks and Regards,

Pankaj

Incorrect accouting entries in Partial settlement document

2024-04-07T20:21:02.189000+02:00

Dear CCM experts,

Please help me with below issue.

Whenever I ran the partial settlement for customer, I'm seeing incorrect financial accounting posting for credit and debit.

This issue is happening only when there are different UOM Busvol and settlement document.

Accounting entries are correct in Delta accruals and Final settlement.

Thankyou

Settlement Management ,

Clarification: Condition Contract Accruals for Sales Rebates compared to SD rebates

2024-04-11T11:37:46.392000+02:00

In principal is it correct to say that in Condition Contracts the accruals are very much executed from within the contract itself rather than the billing document? In ECC the rebate price conditions and account determination are used to trigger the accrual, and so when the billing document is created, or retrospectively updated via VBOF, based on the rebate agreement the accrual will be posted through the billing document.

If I understand rightly, in Condition Contracts it is the contract itself that drives the accrual based on reading the the information in the billing documents. Is that correct?

thanks

Tim

CCM - Settlement to multiple agents - No Supplier to contract XXXXXX

2024-04-18T14:04:31.941000+02:00

Hello all,

We are trying to set up a contract for multiple agents.

Since, SAP standard does not support the settlement to multiple agents using a single contract.

We have created a copy of 0CS1 and disabled the Supplier field at the contract header.

In the business volume selection criteria, we are entering the agents.

For settlement, we have maintained LIFNR in Split criteria.

Accruals are working fine but while doing settlement we are getting an error ‘No Supplier to contract XXXXXX’.

Error message is WB2R 015.

Any inputs/suggestions to resolve this would be very helpful.

Regards

Business Volume Report shows Billing Documents that do not accrue to the contract

2024-04-20T18:20:25.189000+02:00

Hi,

We have a TPM integration with Condition contracts where the Condition contracts are created from TPM, and the overall Settlement and Accrual process works as expected, however we are observing discrepancies in the Business Volume report(WB2R_BUSVOL).

When the Business Volume report is executed for a condition contract, it shows the Billing Documents that did not accrue against the Condition contract with the . The system lists all the billing document for the Customer within the contract duration. Within the condition contract, only the relevant Billing documents are displayed in the condition usage.

How can this be corrected?

for a custom resolution, there is a BADI to influence the report output. How can we link the conditions in the Billing Document to the Condition contract?

SAP_Condition Contract_Spreading fixed amount accrual according to the number of days

2024-04-23T11:11:41.426000+02:00

Hi experts,

i have an yearly fixed amount to be accrued on a monthly base proportionally to the number of days of each month. So, considering for instance 1.200€ yearly, i don't have to post 100 € each month but according to the number of days of each month; below an example.

Yearly bonus: 1.200 €

Delta accrual on 31.01 = (1.200/365)*31 --> 101,92 €

Delta accrual on 28.02 = (1.200/365)*28 --> 92,05 €

Delta accrual on 31.03 = (1.200/365)*31 --> 101,92 €

Delta accrual on 30.04 = (1.200/365)*30 --> 98,63 €

etc...

Do you know how i can manage it?

Thanks and regards

Pier Paolo

CCM Delta accruals calculation

2024-04-26T01:02:19.556000+02:00

Hello,

I have a question about delta accruals. I created an invoice 1, a contract, invoice 2 and did a partial settlement. When i run a delta accrual, the partial settlement, the delta accruals for invoice 1 are calculated correctly but in the settlement document also a line is created for an accrual that reverses the Partial settlement.

There should be no accrual for the Partial settlement done, I am using standard configuration. Anyone can tell me how to correct the delta accrual calculation so that no accruals are done Partial settlements?

Thanks

WBS to AuC - Only settling to one Dep Area (01) (0L), I want it to post to both 0L and 2L.

2024-04-27T22:52:10.775000+02:00

Solved

SAP TPM-CCM : Over Accrual to the customer G/L

2024-05-06T21:22:11.258000+02:00

Hi,

We have SAP TPM system integrated with S/4 Condition Contract Management. The CRM Claim management is used for Settlements. I am looking for guidance to handle the over accruals through the claims.

When the Accrual value from SD Billing document against the Condition contract is 5,000 USD.

An invoice claim is created for 7,000 USD. The claim is approved, Settlement generated and replicated to S/4. Allowing claims having excess amount is a business requirement. The system shows a warning while approval for amount greater than accrual.

Current Behavior : The S/4 settlement document generates the Accounting document, where the entire amount is updated against the Customer G/L.

Expected Behavior : In the accounting document, the accrual amount should be posted to the Customer G/L, and the remaining amount should be posted to another G/L.

CCM : Condition REA5 triggered during partial settlement without having accruals posted beforehand

2024-05-14T15:23:35.551000+02:00

Hello,

when there are negative settlement items in a partial settlement document (due to a negative business volume on these items and the split criteria implemented), on some items REA5 is being triggered. For this condition contract no accruals have been posted beforehand. REA5 should not be triggered in this case as it is normally triggered when the accrual posted is larger then the rebate amount during settlement.

Pricing procedures are created in reference with the sap standard ones.

Anyone has experience how to deal with negative settlement items?

In order to simplify the example I took a contract with only negative items:

testcase: contract with 15% on both accrual and rebate condition type

WB2R_BUSVOL: a G2 and S1 billing document

only a partial settlement is executed which results in two items

item 1 has a positive business volume , this relates to the S1 billing doc

item 2 has a negative business volume amount which relates to G2 . Here Z1A5 is triggered but it should not be triggered. Anyone an idea what is the logic when REA5(= z1a5) is triggered by the settlement program?

Fact that the business volume amount on the first example is negative is not the reason for the issue as for another contract for the same business volume, the Z1A5 was triggered on the first item and not on the second item.

Thanks in advance for some hints,

br, Ilse

Condition Contract: Accrual capping, Intercompany postings possibility

2024-05-16T14:07:07.445000+02:00

Hi,

I have three question for conditions contract process (Settlement Management)

1. I have requirement to put capping for accrual. e.g Accruals should not happen once a specific amount is reached. Is it possible in standard?

2. Does intercompany settlement works under condition contracts? e.g: I have three companies A, B and C. Company C is selling goods to end customer where Company A and B would receive some commission. My approach is to set up separate condition contract under agent commission for A and B. At the time of settlement Company C will issue the settlement document but at the same time company A and B should also post the incoming document against the company C settlement document like Intercompany supplier invoice happens with IDOC.

3. There is requirement that customer would issue and debit memo for rebate amount and system should post that incoming document against the condition contract as settlement document.is it possible?