--- name: hermes-agent description: Use Hermes Agent CLI as a subagent. Lets the main agent prompt Hermes Agent CLI from the terminal in headless mode with the `hermes` command, and send the goal, the decisions and the scope with the task. Use when the user asks to delegate work to Hermes Agent CLI, when a task needs a second independent agent, or when a plan needs a fresh perspective. allowed-tools: - Bash - Read - Write - Grep - Glob --- # Hermes Agent CLI (subagent / task delegation) ## What is it This skill teaches your agent to use an agent from another vendor as a subagent. Almost every coding agent has a headless mode. Headless mode runs the agent from the terminal with one command and returns the answer to stdout. This skill gives the command pattern for one such agent, and the protocol to transfer enough context with the task. You stay the main agent. You keep the plan, the decisions and the conversation with the user. The subagent does one bounded task and reports back. ## When to delegate - **The user asks for it.** The user names another agent, or asks for a second opinion. - **Large or multi-step work.** The task covers several files, phases or checkpoints. - **Code review with a fresh mind.** Another agent reviews the work with a different lens and no memory of the decisions that produced it. - **Planning that needs different ideas.** A second agent proposes options that you did not consider. - **An internal council.** Several subagents answer the same question, and you compare the answers. - **Deep research.** The other CLI has web search, web extraction or browser automation. - **Background investigation.** A long task runs in the background while you continue in the foreground. ## When not to delegate - **Small or single-step tasks.** One or two edits, or a short explanation, are faster in this thread. - **Tight feedback loops.** The user wants quick back-and-forth in one conversation. - **Secrets or policy-sensitive work.** Do not pipe credentials into a subagent. Redact first. - **Context you already hold.** Repeating the whole plan in a prompt adds no value. - **Low return on investment.** If writing the handoff costs more than doing the edit, do the edit. - **Work that needs high precision and full judgement.** A subagent without your context will break a task that depends on a detail only this session knows. ## Delegation and context transfer protocol An isolated subagent saves tokens, but it splits the story. The subagent does not see this conversation. It has no memory of the goal you agreed with the user, the decisions you already made, or the paths you agreed not to touch. A poor handoff causes misread tasks, wrong assumptions about the stack or the style, and wasted edits. Treat every call as **stateless delegation**: the subagent keeps nothing between calls, so each command must carry its own state. A good handoff happens when you keep these practices in mind: - **Shared state handoff.** The prompt carries the original goal, the decisions already made, and the explicit scope, to bridge the subagent's missing session history. - **Contextual preservation.** The high-volume work stays in the isolated process, so the bulk never enters this conversation and no "split story" forms from missing history. - **Result reconciliation.** What comes back is folded into this thread afterwards, so there is a single source of truth. Write the prompt as a transfer of shared state, not as a title. Include all six fields: | Include | Why | |---|---| | **Goal** | The same objective as the user, not only the immediate micro-task. | | **Decisions** | Framework, patterns, naming, "use X not Y" — anything that would otherwise be guessed wrong. | | **Scope** | The absolute paths and modules to touch, and the areas to leave alone. A relative path may not resolve where you expect. | | **Constraints** | Performance, accessibility, compatibility, review gates, "no new dependencies". | | **Verification** | The exact command the subagent must run and pass before it returns. | | **Output** | For example: "report only, no edits", "apply edits with a minimal diff", "list the files changed". | Prefer sequential delegations with explicit carry-over. Parallel runs diverge unless every run gets the same briefing. **Run the subagent in the mode that does the work without asking for approval.** Headless mode has nobody to answer a permission prompt. Any mode that stops to ask will stall, or return an empty answer with a success exit code. Each CLI names this mode differently — take the flag from the vendor card below. **Never call a subagent in plan mode.** Many CLIs have a plan or read-only mode. That mode makes the other agent write a plan *for itself*, which is not what you asked for: you want its work or its answer, and you keep the planning. Plan mode also waits for someone to approve that plan, so the run comes back with nothing. If you want no file changes, keep the auto-approving mode and write "report only, no edits" in the **Output** field. Do not use plan mode to make a run read-only. After the subagent returns: - **Report to the user.** Give a short summary. Do not paste long logs unless the user asks. - **Reconcile the context.** Record the decisions it made, the files it changed, and the open risks, so this session stays the single source of truth. ## CLI failure modes Every vendor has its own terminal rules. A headless run fails quietly more often than it fails loudly. - **Wrap the call in an external timeout.** A headless CLI can stall before its own timeout starts. - **Exit code 0 is not success.** If stdout is empty, treat the run as failed and read stderr. A permission the CLI could not ask for, and a prompt that never arrived, both look like success. - **Never carry a flag habit from one CLI to another.** The same short flag means different things in different tools. In OpenCode, `-p` is `--password`: passing a prompt to it empties the message and the run waits on stdin forever. Confirm every flag against the CLI's own `--help`. - **An unrecognized-flag error means this skill is stale, not that the task is impossible.** Read `--help`, continue with the flags that exist, and tell the user which line in this file is wrong. ## Vendor card ### Binary and prompt form - **Binary:** `hermes` - **Prompt form:** **flag.** `hermes chat -q "prompt"` (alias `--query`) seeds the session with the prompt as its first turn. For a minimal, purely non-interactive one-shot run there is also **`hermes -z "prompt"`**, which prints only the final text to stdout and nothing else, with defined exit codes (`0` completed, `2` failed/partial, `130` interrupted). Add `-Q`/`--quiet` alongside `chat -q` for programmatic use — it suppresses the banner, spinner, and tool previews. ### Headless and output flags | Need | Flag | |---|---| | One-shot query, seeds first turn | `chat -q "prompt"` / `--query` | | Minimal one-shot, final text only, defined exit codes | `-z "prompt"` | | Quiet, script-safe output | `-Q`, `--quiet` | | Verbose/debug output | `--verbose`, `-v` | | Turn cap | `--max-turns N` (one official source states a default of 500; treat any other stated default as unverified) | | Tag session as third-party | `--source tool` (keeps it out of the user's own session list; documented default is `cli`) | No dedicated `--output-format json` flag is documented; `-Q`/`-z` plus the final response is the machine-readable surface. ### Approvals and permissions `--yolo` bypasses dangerous-command approval, but does **not** override a hardline blocklist of catastrophic commands (e.g. `rm -rf /`, fork bombs). The env var `HERMES_YOLO_MODE` is documented as being set internally by `--yolo`; the exact accepted value string (e.g. `true`) is not spelled out — prefer the `--yolo` flag itself over setting the env var by hand. `--accept-hooks` is narrower than it sounds: it only auto-approves shell **hooks** (event/command pairs), persisting each approval to `~/.hermes/shell-hooks-allowlist.json` — it is not general tool approval. No per-tool allow-rule flag is documented; the only tool-level scoping is `--toolsets` (enabling whole bundles). The real gate for headless runs is **`approvals.mode`** in `~/.hermes/config.yaml` (`smart` = default, auxiliary-LLM risk assessment; `manual` = always prompt; `off` = disabled), plus three separate headless-context keys that each **default to `deny`**: `single_query_mode` (governs `-q`/one-shot), `cron_mode` (scheduled jobs), and `unattended_mode` (webhook/API sessions). **With the default `deny`, a dangerous command is not executed: the tool call returns an error to the agent** (which is instructed not to blindly retry/rephrase) rather than stalling indefinitely or silently exiting 0. Set the relevant mode to `approve` to auto-approve in that context. Unapproved shell hooks specifically are documented as "skipped rather than silently approved" — a different subsystem from the `approvals.mode` gate. ### Models and how to list them Models are specified as `provider/model-name`. Run **`hermes model`** for the interactive provider+model picker (also the place to add new providers/API keys/OAuth — in-session `/model` only switches among already-configured models). A `--refresh` flag on `hermes model` is **not confirmed** in the docs checked. `hermes config show` and `hermes status [--all] [--deep]` show current configuration. Documented provider keys: `openai-api`, `gemini`, `zai` (not `zhipuai`), `deepseek`, `kimi-coding` / `kimi-coding-cn`, `minimax` / `minimax-cn`, `nous`, `openrouter`, `xai`, `ollama-cloud`, plus many more (e.g. `novita`, `bedrock`, `azure-foundry`, `alibaba`). `mistral` and `groq` were **not** found as first-class provider IDs — they may only be reachable via a generic OpenAI-compatible custom endpoint. Model availability depends entirely on which providers the user has authenticated — search the web or check [Artificial Analysis](https://artificialanalysis.ai/) for current pricing and benchmarks, then confirm the exact ID via `hermes model` before pinning it in a delegation. ### Command pattern ```bash hermes chat -q "GOAL: [goal] | DECISIONS: [decisions] | SCOPE: [paths] | CONSTRAINTS: [constraints] | VERIFICATION: [test_command] | OUTPUT: [format]" \ --yolo -Q --toolsets "file,terminal,web,skills" --model "provider/" 2>&1 ``` ### Prompt examples - **Implement:** `hermes chat -q "GOAL: [goal] | DECISIONS: [decisions] | SCOPE: [paths] | VERIFICATION: [test_command] | OUTPUT: files changed" --yolo -Q --toolsets "file,terminal,web,skills"` - **Review:** `hermes chat -q "GOAL: Review [scope] for [concerns] | OUTPUT: review report with severities" --yolo -Q --toolsets "file,terminal,web" -s requesting-code-review` - **Research (report only):** `hermes chat -q "GOAL: Find latest documentation for [library] | CONSTRAINTS: do not edit any file | OUTPUT: summary report" --yolo -Q --toolsets "web,file"` ### Docs and reference - Delegation checklist and full flag/tool/toolset/model tables: [reference.md](reference.md) - Vendor documentation: - **Checked against the official Nous Research documentation on 2026-09-19. Not run against an installed binary — confirm with `hermes --help` before trusting a flag.** This is a smaller, actively maintained open-source project; several precise details (exact `HERMES_YOLO_MODE` value, `--max-turns` default, whether skills surface as slash commands) could not be pinned to a single authoritative sentence.