--- name: customize description: > Guided customization of your legal clinic profile — change one thing without re-running the whole cold-start interview. Adjust clinic profile, jurisdiction, supervision style, practice-area templates, semester configuration, or output safeguards. Use when the user says "change my [thing]", "new semester", "add a practice area", "update my config", or "customize". argument-hint: "[section name, or describe what you want to change]" --- # /customize ## When this runs The user typed `/legal-clinic:customize`. They (usually the professor, sometimes a student) want to change something in the clinic profile — a jurisdiction, a supervision style, a practice-area template, a semester rollover — without re-running the whole cold-start interview and without hand-editing YAML. ## What to do 1. **Read the config.** Read `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md`. If the plugin config does not exist or still contains `[PLACEHOLDER]` values, say: > You haven't run setup yet. Run `/legal-clinic:cold-start-interview` > first — customize is for adjusting a profile you already have. 2. **Show the customizable map.** List what's in the profile, grouped, with a one-line summary of the current value: - **Clinic profile** — clinic name, host school, faculty lead, active practice areas, case type limits - **Jurisdiction** — primary state, courts, agencies, local rules path - **Supervision style** — informal vs. formal review queue; if formal, who reviews what before it goes out - **Practice-area templates** — which templates are active (immigration, housing, small business, family, expungement, etc.) and any local overrides - **Semester** — current semester, active students, rollover rules, handoff memo format - **Output safeguards** — plain-language standards for client-facing outputs, deadline warning rules, privilege labeling - **Seed documents** — clinic handbook, jurisdiction rules, template letters, sample memos, form libraries - **Outputs** — supervisor guide format, client letter templates, memo scaffolds - **Workflow** — case directories, deadline tracker location, review queue channel - **Integrations** — document storage / Slack / court e-filing status, fallbacks 3. **Ask what they want to change.** > What would you like to adjust? Pick a section, or describe the change in > your own words. 4. **Make the change.** Show the current value, ask for the new value, explain what changes downstream, confirm, write it to the config. Examples: - *Adding a new practice area:* "`/client-intake` will route matters of this type through the new template. `/draft`, `/memo`, and `/client-letter` will use the practice-area prompts. `/research-start` will add the corresponding Westlaw search terms." - *Supervision style informal → formal review queue:* "`/supervisor-review-queue` becomes active — student output will land there for supervisor sign-off before it goes to the client." - *New semester rollover:* "I'll archive the prior semester's active cases, carry forward matters you flag as continuing, and prompt the incoming students through `/ramp`." 5. **Close.** > Done. Your next output will reflect the change. Anything else? You can > run `/legal-clinic:customize` anytime. ## Guardrails - **Never delete a section.** If the user wants to "drop" a practice area, offer to mark it `[Archived]` and explain that archiving keeps case history accessible but hides the template from `/client-intake` routing. - **Flag internal inconsistency.** If the change would make the profile inconsistent (e.g., formal review queue on + informal supervision note; or practice area on + no jurisdiction rules configured), flag the tension. - **Flag guardrail degradation.** These are load-bearing and should not be removed: the "NOT final work product" framing on `/draft`, plain-language standards on client-facing outputs, "does NOT decide case acceptance" on `/client-intake`, "NOT substantive advice" on `/client-letter`, and the scaffold-not-analysis framing on `/memo`. These exist because students ship work product — if the safeguards go, the risk of student work reaching a client without supervisor review goes up. Confirm the trade-off with the user, and if they're a student rather than the professor, suggest they discuss it with the supervisor first. - **One change at a time.** Don't re-ask the whole interview.