generated: '2026-09-01'
method: searched
probe: true
source: well-known/0xarchive-security.txt
contact:
- mailto:support@0xarchive.io
evidence:
- source: well-known/0xarchive-security.txt
  kind: security.txt (previously harvested)
policy_published: false
bug_bounty: false
bug_bounty_probe:
  checked: '2026-09-01'
  method: 0-working/probe-security-programs.py, which scans the security.txt and the site for HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti and disclosure-page markers
  result: >-
    No bug-bounty or disclosure program found. The security.txt carries no Policy line and no
    bounty-platform URL, and the probe found no trust center or named certification.
security_txt:
  url: https://0xarchive.io/.well-known/security.txt
  http_status: 200
  content_type: text/plain
  fetched: '2026-09-01'
  fields_present:
  - Contact
  - Expires
  - Preferred-Languages
  - Canonical
  fields_absent:
  - Policy
  - Encryption
  - Acknowledgments
  - Hiring
  - CSAF
  expires: '2027-08-30'
  expires_valid: true
  note: >-
    RFC 9116 compliant and, importantly, NOT expired - the Expires field runs to 2027-08-30, which
    is nearly a year out. A large share of published security.txt files in this catalog are stale;
    this one is current. What it lacks is a Policy field: there is a monitored contact but no
    stated disclosure policy, so a researcher knows who to tell and not what to expect back.
recommendation: >-
  Adding a single Policy: line pointing at a short disclosure page would complete this file at
  essentially zero cost, and it is the only thing standing between this and a full vulnerability
  disclosure posture.