generated: '2026-08-13' method: searched source: >- https://www.act.com/uploads/act_security_privacy_whitepaper.pdf (Act! Products Security and Privacy whitepaper, 7 pages, fetched 2026-08-13), https://www.act.com/resources/soc-compliance/ and https://www.act.com/legal/privacy-policy/. description: >- Act! has no trust-center portal — no Vanta/Drata/SafeBase page, no self-service report request. What it publishes is a downloadable Security and Privacy whitepaper that names its audits and its hosting posture, plus a marketing page explaining what SOC 2 and SOC 3 mean. The audit reports themselves are gated: the SOC 2 report requires an NDA and the SOC 3 report is "available on request". trust_center_portal: false portal_url: null documents: - name: Act! Products Security and Privacy whitepaper url: https://www.act.com/uploads/act_security_privacy_whitepaper.pdf http_status: 200 fetched: '2026-08-13' pages: 7 note: >- Marked "Confidential & Proprietary" in its own footer while being served unauthenticated from the site footer link. - name: SOC Compliance resources url: https://www.act.com/resources/soc-compliance/ http_status: 200 fetched: '2026-08-13' note: >- Educational — explains the difference between SOC 2 and SOC 3 and links a free PDF. It does NOT itself assert an Act! certification; the certification claims live in the whitepaper above. - name: Act! Global Privacy Policy url: https://www.act.com/legal/privacy-policy/ - name: Terms of Service url: https://www.act.com/legal/terms-of-service/ certifications: - name: SOC 2 status: claimed scope: Act! Premium Cloud evidence: >- "This entire process has been validated by the SOC 2 audit process"; Act!'s vendor selection process "has been evaluated as SOC 2 compliant"; database access during support follows "a SOC 2-compliant process"; SOC 2-compliant Emergency Response and Business Continuity processes. report_access: NDA required auditor: not named period: not stated - name: SOC 3 status: claimed scope: Act! Premium Cloud evidence: '"the SOC 3 Audit Report (available on request)"' report_access: available on request note: >- A SOC 3 report is designed for public distribution. Act! gates it behind a request anyway, which is the opposite of how the report type is meant to work and is the single easiest credibility upgrade available here. - name: ISO 27001 status: not claimed - name: PCI DSS status: not claimed note: >- Act! Payments accepts card payments, but no PCI attestation is published in the whitepaper or on the payments product page. - name: HIPAA status: not claimed - name: FedRAMP status: not claimed security_posture_published: hosting: Amazon Web Services; end-user data-center region defaults from billing postal code. Act! stores no customer databases at its office locations. tenancy: Each customer database is stored and backed up as an independent database. encryption_in_transit: TLS 1.2 (whitepaper states "currently (July 2023), we support TLS 1.2") encryption_at_rest: SHA 256 (as worded in the whitepaper) backups: Daily, encrypted, stored off the database server. mfa: Available on Act! Premium Cloud; enforced on the AWS Management Console. endpoint_protection: Anti-virus/endpoint protection on every server, updated daily. monitoring: 24/7 threat monitoring in partnership with Rapid7; engineer on duty outside business hours. privileged_access: AWS console access limited to teams of four or fewer screened employees, restricted to the internal network or VPN, reviewed daily by a Director-level role. support_access: Act! employees do not access a customer database without documented customer consent. findings: - >- The whitepaper's encryption statements are dated July 2023 and stop at TLS 1.2. Live probing on 2026-08-13 found www.act.com and developer.act.com negotiating TLS 1.3, but the API host apimta.act.com negotiating TLS 1.2 — so the API is the laggard, and the published document has not been revised in three years. See security/act-domain-security.yml. - >- "encrypted at rest, SHA 256" describes a hash, not a cipher. The intended claim is presumably AES-256; as written the statement does not say what it means. - No ISO 27001 and no PCI DSS attestation published despite shipping a payments product.