generated: '2026-09-06'
method: searched
source: https://actionstreamer.com/sitemap.xml
note: >-
  Searched for a published pricing or plans page across the corporate sitemap (231 URLs), the
  developer portal and the product pages. ActionStreamer publishes no pricing of any kind: no tiers,
  no free tier, no per-device or per-stream rates, no metered API pricing. Sales is contact-gated.
  Recorded as an explicit zero.
plan_count: 0
plans: []
pricing_model: contact-sales
free_tier: false
public_pricing: false
self_serve_signup: false
evidence:
- url: https://actionstreamer.com/pricing
  status: 404
- url: https://actionstreamer.com/sitemap.xml
  status: 200
  finding: >-
    231 URLs, none of them a pricing, plans or cost page. The sitemap covers products (actionsync,
    iris, wearables, sdk, ai), 15 application/vertical pages, 106 blog posts and a 142-term glossary.
- url: https://actionstreamer.com/contact
  status: 200
  finding: The commercial path is a contact form.
- url: https://portal.actionstreamer.com/
  status: 200
  finding: >-
    The portal is a sign-in surface for existing customers; API keys are created inside it under
    Settings > API Keys. There is no public self-service signup that would expose a price.
buyer_note: >-
  Consistent with the company's go-to-market: hardware-plus-platform deployments into industrial,
  first-responder, aerospace/MRO and defense accounts, sold as OEM and enterprise engagements rather
  than as a metered developer API. A developer cannot price an integration without talking to sales,
  and cannot obtain API credentials without an existing account.
recommendations:
- Publish at least an indicative pricing model (per device, per stream-hour, or platform tier) so integrators can scope a project.
- Offer a developer sandbox or trial that issues API keys without a sales conversation.