generated: '2026-09-12'
method: searched
source: >-
  openapi/agl-open-openapi-original.yml, openapi/agl-ota-openapi-original.yml,
  openapi/agl-tripcom-outbound-openapi-original.yml
docs: >-
  https://api-docs-agl-bridgeapi.tigergds.com/reference (AGL OPEN API info.description states the
  header contract in prose), https://api-doc.tigergds.com/reference
summary:
  types: [apiKey, http]
  api_key_in: [header]
  oauth2_flows: []
  oauth2: false
  oidc: false
  mutual_tls: false
  credential_issuance: >-
    Manual. Credentials are issued per partner after the partnership application at
    https://www.aglgw.com/en/partners or the TIGER GDS partner sign-up at
    https://www.tigergds.com/signup/step1. There is no self-service key creation, no key-rotation
    operation and no scope model anywhere in the platform.
  request_signing: >-
    Two of the three surfaces sign requests. The AGL OPEN API's Authorization header carries a
    "Bearer <SHA-256 hashed signature>", and the Trip.com outbound bridge carries a sign value
    alongside accountId, serviceName, requestTime and version in its request-header object.
    Neither publishes the canonical string-to-sign, so neither signature can be implemented from
    the public documentation alone - it has to come from AGL during onboarding.
schemes:
- name: bearerAuth
  api: AGL OPEN API
  type: http
  scheme: bearer
  bearerFormat: SHA-256
  applied: globally via the root security block
  docs_note: >-
    "All APIs are secured using SHA-256-based Authorization and require proper identification
    headers." - AGL OPEN API info.description.
  sources: [openapi/agl-open-openapi-original.yml]
- name: X-Supplier-Code
  api: AGL OPEN API
  type: identification-header
  in: header
  parameter: X-Supplier-Code
  required: true
  description: Supplier code issued by AGL. Required on every SupplierToAGL operation.
  sources: [openapi/agl-open-openapi-original.yml]
- name: X-Client-Code
  api: AGL OPEN API
  type: identification-header
  in: header
  parameter: X-Client-Code
  required: true
  description: >-
    Client code issued by the supplier to AGL. Required on the AGLToSupplier operations - the
    callbacks AGL makes into the supplier's endpoint.
  sources: [openapi/agl-open-openapi-original.yml]
- name: bearerAuth
  api: AGL OTA API
  type: apiKey
  in: header
  parameter: Authorization
  applied: globally via the root security block
  note: >-
    Declared as an apiKey in the Authorization header rather than as http/bearer, so the contract
    does not state whether the value is prefixed "Bearer ".
  sources: [openapi/agl-ota-openapi-original.yml]
- name: clientId
  api: AGL OTA API
  type: apiKey
  in: header
  parameter: clientId
  applied: globally via the root security block
  description: Partner identifier issued by AGL, sent alongside the Authorization token.
  sources: [openapi/agl-ota-openapi-original.yml]
- name: Bearer
  api: AGL Trip.com Reservation Integration API
  type: http
  scheme: Bearer
  bearerFormat: JWT
  sources: [openapi/agl-tripcom-outbound-openapi-original.yml]
- name: ClientId
  api: AGL Trip.com Reservation Integration API
  type: apiKey
  in: header
  parameter: ClientId
  sources: [openapi/agl-tripcom-outbound-openapi-original.yml]
- name: Currency
  api: AGL Trip.com Reservation Integration API
  type: apiKey
  in: header
  parameter: Currency
  note: >-
    Declared as a securityScheme but is a content-negotiation header, not a credential. Recorded
    as the contract declares it.
  sources: [openapi/agl-tripcom-outbound-openapi-original.yml]
- name: Language
  api: AGL Trip.com Reservation Integration API
  type: apiKey
  in: header
  parameter: Language
  note: Same as Currency - declared as a securityScheme but is not a credential.
  sources: [openapi/agl-tripcom-outbound-openapi-original.yml]
scopes:
  supported: false
  note: >-
    No OAuth 2.0 and therefore no scope surface. Authorization is all-or-nothing per issued
    credential, differentiated only by partner type (Provider Partner or Seller Partner, chosen at
    sign-up) and by which of the two contracts the partner is given access to. No scopes/ artifact
    is written - there is nothing to enumerate.