generated: '2026-09-02' method: probed source: >- live probes of Amphenol hosts; each entry's evidence names the exact URL and what it returned provider: Amphenol providerId: amphenol description: >- Standards conformance asserted only where a live Amphenol surface demonstrated it. Amphenol publishes no compliance or standards page reachable to this run — the corporate host returns HTTP 403 at the CDN edge to non-browser clients — so nothing here rests on a marketing claim. Where a standard was not met, that is recorded as conforms: false rather than omitted. conformance: - id: oauth2 name: OAuth 2.0 conforms: true evidence: >- amphenol-automotive.com serves a complete authorization-server metadata document with issuer, authorization_endpoint, token_endpoint and revocation_endpoint, and its protected resource returns HTTP 401 with a WWW-Authenticate-style JSON challenge. source: https://amphenol-automotive.com/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server status: 200 - id: rfc8414 name: 'RFC 8414 — OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server Metadata' conforms: true evidence: >- /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server returns HTTP 200 application/json carrying issuer, authorization_endpoint, token_endpoint, response_types_supported, grant_types_supported, code_challenge_methods_supported, scopes_supported and token_endpoint_auth_methods_supported. source: https://amphenol-automotive.com/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server status: 200 - id: rfc9728 name: 'RFC 9728 — OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata' conforms: true evidence: >- /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource returns HTTP 200 naming resource, authorization_servers, bearer_methods_supported and scopes_supported. This is the discovery document an MCP client needs to find the authorization server from the resource. source: https://amphenol-automotive.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource status: 200 - id: rfc7636 name: 'RFC 7636 — PKCE' conforms: true evidence: code_challenge_methods_supported is ["S256"]; plain is not offered. source: https://amphenol-automotive.com/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server status: 200 - id: mcp name: Model Context Protocol conforms: partial evidence: >- A live MCP resource is registered and advertised, and it rejects unauthenticated JSON-RPC with a protocol-shaped 401. Full conformance could not be established because tools/list is auth-gated, so the initialize handshake, protocolVersion and tool schemas were never seen. source: https://amphenol-automotive.com/wp-json/mcp/mcp-oauth-server status: 401 - id: rfc9457 name: 'RFC 9457 — Problem Details for HTTP APIs' conforms: false evidence: >- No endpoint returns application/problem+json. Two ad-hoc JSON error envelopes are in use across the company's hosts. See errors/amphenol-problem-types.yml. source: https://amphenol-industrial.com/wp-json/parts-direct-search/v1/search status: 400 - id: rfc9116 name: 'RFC 9116 — security.txt' conforms: false evidence: >- 404 on amphenol-automotive.com and amphenolsensors.com; amphenol-industrial.com answers 200 with its HTML homepage, a soft-404, not an RFC 9116 document; 403 at the edge on the corporate hosts. source: https://amphenol-industrial.com/.well-known/security.txt status: 200 - id: pagination name: Collection pagination conforms: false evidence: The search endpoint accepts no page, per_page, limit, offset or cursor parameter. source: https://amphenol-industrial.com/wp-json/parts-direct-search/v1/search status: 200 - id: idempotency name: Idempotency keys conforms: na evidence: 'No write surface is reachable; the search endpoint advertises Allow: GET.' - id: openapi name: OpenAPI conforms: false evidence: >- No OpenAPI or Swagger document was served at /openapi.json, /openapi.yaml, /swagger.json, /api-docs or /docs on any reachable Amphenol host. The only machine-readable route description that exists is the WordPress REST index at /wp-json/, which is a route descriptor, not an API contract. source: https://amphenol-industrial.com/openapi.json status: 404 - id: llmstxt name: llms.txt conforms: true evidence: >- Three Amphenol division hosts serve a real llms.txt: amphenolsensors.com (hand-authored, 1,572 bytes), amphenol-industrial.com (generated by Rank Math SEO, 6,255 bytes) and amphenol-automotive.com (hand-authored "GEO optimized" content map, 3,734 bytes). source: https://amphenolsensors.com/llms.txt status: 200 domain_standards: probed: true found: false note: >- Amphenol's market is electronic interconnect manufacturing, whose interchange standards are supply-chain formats rather than web-API standards. No SCIM URN, OData $metadata, OpenRTB, Sparkplug topic namespace, ActivityPub actor, OAI-PMH verb, LTI/OneRoster shape, HL7v2, X12, EDIFACT or ISO 20022 message type appears in any surface probed. Amphenol's own plans artifact records that distributor exchange is bilateral EDI, which would be the place an X12 or EDIFACT signature could live, but no such contract is published: the exchange is partner-private. This is REWARD-ONLY — no domain standard is invented to fill the slot. candidates_checked: - scim - odata - x12 - edifact - iso20022 - sparkplug certifications: found: false note: >- No trust centre, no SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / PCI / HIPAA / FedRAMP attestation page was reachable. probe-security-programs.py returned vdp=none trust=none. No Compliance pointer is emitted, because emitting one would assert a published compliance programme that this run could not find. checked: '2026-09-02' maintainers: - FN: API Evangelist email: info@apievangelist.com