generated: '2026-09-04' method: probed source: >- https://api.apollo.com/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server (scopes_supported) and https://api.apollo.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp (scopes_supported), both HTTP 200, fetched 2026-09-04. description: >- The complete scope surface Apollo Global Management advertises. It is the standard OpenID Connect set plus offline_access — no Apollo-specific business scopes are published. Apollo has no scopes or permissions reference page; a documentation search across www.apollo.com (4,784 sitemap URLs, no /api or /developer path segment anywhere) found none, so nothing could be added beyond what the discovery documents declare. docs: null docs_note: No scopes/permissions reference page is published by Apollo. authorization_server: https://api.apollo.com scopes: - name: openid description: >- Standard OpenID Connect scope requesting an ID token. Advertised by both the authorization server and the MCP protected resource. standard: openid-connect-core resources: - https://api.apollo.com/mcp - name: profile description: >- Standard OpenID Connect scope for basic profile claims. Advertised by both the authorization server and the MCP protected resource. standard: openid-connect-core resources: - https://api.apollo.com/mcp - name: email description: >- Standard OpenID Connect scope for the email and email_verified claims. Advertised by both the authorization server and the MCP protected resource. standard: openid-connect-core resources: - https://api.apollo.com/mcp - name: offline_access description: >- Standard scope requesting a refresh token. Advertised by the authorization server only; the MCP protected-resource document does not list it. standard: openid-connect-core resources: [] scope_count: 4 gaps: - >- No resource-specific or business-domain scopes are advertised. Whatever the MCP server lets an authorized agent read or write is not expressed in the scope surface, so an integrator cannot reason about least privilege from public documents.