slug: cloudrf provider: CloudRF generated_by: planning/capability-mapping/scripts/classify_capabilities.py model: claude-opus-5 frame: - Telecommunications min_confidence: 0.7 capability_model: source: https://github.com/vincentmakes/turbo-ea-capabilities license: CC-BY-4.0 attribution: Turbo EA Capabilities by Vincent Verdet — Turbo EA, https://github.com/vincentmakes/turbo-ea-capabilities, CC BY 4.0 notice: NOTICE edge_count: 3 edges: - tag: Create spec_file: cloudrf-create-api-openapi.yml capability_id: BC-2610.20 capability_id_l1: BC-2610 capability_name: Network Coverage Planning confidence: 0.8 evidence: POST /area createArea Multipoint coverage heatmap; POST /path createPath Point-to-point link; POST /multilink createMultilink Mesh network reason: Core RF propagation modelling operations produce coverage heatmaps and link/mesh predictions — i.e. planning of geographic radio coverage and transport links, matching Network Coverage Planning. - tag: 3D spec_file: cloudrf-3d-api-openapi.yml capability_id: BC-2610.20 capability_id_l1: BC-2610 capability_name: Network Coverage Planning confidence: 0.78 evidence: 'POST /3d create3d ''3D coverage''; vendor: ''RF propagation, coverage modeling, and wireless network planning service''' reason: The operation computes 3D RF coverage from propagation modelling, which is exactly planning of geographic coverage for radio networks (Network Coverage Planning). Slight ambiguity with capacity/site planning keeps it below 0.8. - tag: Analyse spec_file: cloudrf-analyse-api-openapi.yml capability_id: BC-2610 capability_id_l1: BC-2610 capability_name: Telecom Network Planning Management confidence: 0.72 evidence: POST /best-site analyseBestSite Best site within an area; GET /best-server analyseBestServer Best server for receiver; POST /interference analyseInterference Network interference reason: Operations analyse candidate transmitter sites, best serving cell and inter-site interference for a wireless network — design/dimensioning analytics that sit in telecom network planning. Mixed sub-scope (site selection plus interference analysis) so no single L2 asserted.