generated: '2026-08-09' method: searched source: >- https://dev.cobot.me/api2, https://dev.cobot.me/api-docs, https://www.cobot.me/pages/api_changes, https://www.cobotstatus.me/, https://api.cobot.me/health, openapi/cobot-api2-openapi.yml summary: >- Two live API generations run side by side. API 2 is the actively developed surface and the only one with a machine-readable contract; API 1 is described by Cobot as legacy but remains available, remains the only home of webhooks, and carries no announced sunset. There is a real hosted status page and a machine-readable health endpoint, a long dated change log for v1, and no formal deprecation policy of any kind. versioning: scheme: major-version-per-surface current: '2.0' current_source: openapi/cobot-api2-openapi.yml (info.version) in_url: false in_header: false separation: >- Versions are separated by host and path shape, not a version segment — API 2 is https://api.cobot.me, API 1 is https://.cobot.me/api. versions: - version: '2.0' status: current docs: https://dev.cobot.me/api2 spec: https://dev.cobot.me/openapi.json base_url: https://api.cobot.me note: 134 operations, JSON:API, OAuth 2 scopes on every operation. - version: '1.0' status: legacy docs: https://dev.cobot.me/api-docs spec: none published base_url: 'https://.cobot.me/api' note: >- Cobot's own words — "API 2 ... is our newest and actively developed version. API 1 is still available but is now legacy." Still the only surface with webhooks and several resources (custom fields, activities, help-desk issues, guest accounts, time passes) that API 2 does not expose. deprecation: policy_published: false sunset_dates_announced: false rfc8594_sunset_header: not observed deprecation_header: not observed deprecated_operations_in_spec: 0 evidence: >- Zero operations in the API 2 OpenAPI carry `deprecated: true`. No sunset or deprecation entry appears anywhere in the 207-entry v1 change log. No deprecation or API-lifecycle policy page exists on dev.cobot.me or www.cobot.me. assessment: >- Generous in practice, undocumented in policy. Cobot has kept a legacy API alive for years rather than forcing a migration, which is good for integrators — but an integrator has no written commitment to rely on, and no notice period to plan against. change_communication: changelog: https://www.cobot.me/pages/api_changes changelog_artifact: changelog/cobot-changelog.yml covers: API 1 only entries: 207 most_recent: '2024-07-25' feed: none gap: >- The actively developed surface (API 2) has no dated change log and no feed, so there is no way to diff what changed between two dates on the API that Cobot tells you to build against. status: status_page: https://www.cobotstatus.me/ status_page_kind: hosted status page (Statuspage-style, uptime + incident history) health_endpoint: https://api.cobot.me/health health_response: 204 No Content health_advertised_in: https://www.cobot.me/.well-known/api-catalog (linkset "status" relation) note: >- The health endpoint being advertised in the RFC 9727 api-catalog is a genuinely modern touch — a machine can discover Cobot's liveness probe from the well-known document alone. sla: published: false evidence: >- No SLA, uptime commitment or support-response commitment is published on the pricing page, terms of service or status page. Support is described as "free support chat" with a paid premium support option. support: help_center: https://helpcenter.cobot.me/en/ support: https://www.cobot.me/en/support developer_portal: https://dev.cobot.me/ premium_support: offered as a paid add-on (llms.txt, "Support" section) operator: legal_entity: Upstream - Agile GmbH address: Harzer Str. 39, 12059 Berlin, Germany register: HRB 110149 B imprint: https://www.cobot.me/en/imprint data_residency: EU (stated in llms.txt — "Server in the EU", "Made in Germany")