slug: craft-io
provider: Craft.io
generated_by: planning/capability-mapping/scripts/classify_capabilities.py
model: claude-opus-5
frame:
- Software & Technology
min_confidence: 0.7
capability_model:
  source: https://github.com/vincentmakes/turbo-ea-capabilities
  license: CC-BY-4.0
  attribution: Turbo EA Capabilities by Vincent Verdet — Turbo EA, https://github.com/vincentmakes/turbo-ea-capabilities,
    CC BY 4.0
  notice: NOTICE
edge_count: 2
edges:
- tag: Feedback items
  spec_file: craft-io-feedback-items-api-openapi.yml
  capability_id: BC-4200.10
  capability_id_l1: BC-4200
  capability_name: Product Discovery & Backlog Management
  confidence: 0.75
  evidence: GET /feedback_portal/{portalId}/feedback_items GetIdeas "Get ideas"; POST /feedback_portal/{portalId}/feedback
    PostIdea "Post idea"; schemas FeedbackItem, LinkedItem
  reason: Ideas submitted and retrieved from customer feedback portals, linkable to work items — this
    is the market/customer-signal ideation and validation input to the product backlog in a product-management
    platform. Some ambiguity against voice-of-customer / customer-insight capabilities keeps confidence
    below 0.8.
- tag: Work Items and OKRs
  spec_file: craft-io-work-items-and-okrs-api-openapi.yml
  capability_id: BC-4200.10
  capability_id_l1: BC-4200
  capability_name: Product Discovery & Backlog Management
  confidence: 0.75
  evidence: GET /workspace/{workspaceId}/items GetItems; POST /item CreateItem; "initiatives, products,
    epics, features, and stories"; Omit_Item...sprint-or-quarter-or-assignee-or-storyPoints-or-objective-or-keyResult...
  reason: CRUD over epics/features/stories with sprints, story points, personas and linked feedback is
    product backlog stewardship. The OKR fields (objective, keyResult) hint at strategy-execution too,
    but the dominant surface is backlog item management, so the L2 is asserted at moderate-high confidence.