slug: culture-amp
provider: Culture Amp
generated_by: planning/capability-mapping/scripts/classify_capabilities.py
model: claude-opus-5
frame:
- Software & Technology
min_confidence: 0.7
capability_model:
  source: https://github.com/vincentmakes/turbo-ea-capabilities
  license: CC-BY-4.0
  attribution: Turbo EA Capabilities by Vincent Verdet — Turbo EA, https://github.com/vincentmakes/turbo-ea-capabilities,
    CC BY 4.0
  notice: NOTICE
edge_count: 3
edges:
- tag: Performance
  spec_file: culture-amp-performance-api-openapi.yml
  capability_id: BC-300.20
  capability_id_l1: BC-300
  capability_name: Talent Management
  confidence: 0.9
  evidence: GET /performance-cycles 'List performance cycles'; GET /manager-reviews 'List manager reviews';
    schemas 'PerformanceRating', 'PerformanceReviewStatus'
  reason: Performance cycles, manager reviews and performance ratings are performance management artefacts,
    which sits under Talent Management in HCM.
- tag: Employees
  spec_file: culture-amp-employees-api-openapi.yml
  capability_id: BC-300.70
  capability_id_l1: BC-300
  capability_name: HR Operations Management
  confidence: 0.8
  evidence: GET /employees 'List employees'; GET /employees/{id}/demographics 'List demographics by employee';
    schemas 'Employee', 'Demographic'
  reason: The tag exposes employee master records and demographic attributes, i.e. employee record keeping
    within HR operations. L2 chosen as HR Operations Management since the surface is record retrieval
    rather than any talent process.
- tag: Surveys
  spec_file: culture-amp-surveys-api-openapi.yml
  capability_id: BC-300.60
  capability_id_l1: BC-300
  capability_name: Employee Experience Management
  confidence: 0.78
  evidence: GET /surveys 'List surveys'; GET /surveys/{id}/responses 'List responses'; vendor describes
    'employee engagement surveys'
  reason: The survey surface returns employee engagement survey definitions, questions, factors and responses,
    which realises employee experience/engagement measurement. Slight ambiguity remains since surveys
    could also be read as generic feedback tooling, but the vendor context names employee engagement explicitly.