generated: '2026-08-12'
method: probed
source: >-
  live unauthenticated HTTP probes of https://api.caradhras.io, https://auth.caradhras.io and
  https://developers.dock.tech on 2026-08-12
documented_publicly: false
note: >-
  Dock's authentication model is NOT publicly documented and this artifact does not claim
  otherwise — no `Authentication` pointer is wired into apis.yml for this provider, because
  the scoring check reads "authentication is documented" and it is not. What follows is only
  what could be observed anonymously.
schemes: []
observed:
  challenge_status: 430
  www_authenticate: false
  error_type_header: 'x-dock-errortype: AuthorizationError'
  body: '{"error": "access denied"}'
  note: >-
    The gateway rejects anonymous traffic before routing and returns no WWW-Authenticate
    header, so a client cannot discover the scheme (apiKey vs http bearer vs oauth2) from the
    wire at all.
discovery_attempts:
- url: https://auth.caradhras.io/.well-known/openid-configuration
  status: 430
- url: https://auth.caradhras.io/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server
  status: 430
- url: https://api.caradhras.io/.well-known/openid-configuration
  status: 430
- url: https://api.caradhras.io/oauth2/token
  status: 430
- url: https://developers.dock.tech/reference/
  status: 302
  redirect: https://dash.readme.com/to/dock-tech?redirect=%2Freference%2F
inference:
  auth_host_exists: true
  auth_host: https://auth.caradhras.io
  note: >-
    A dedicated auth host resolves and serves TLS, which is consistent with a token-issuing
    endpoint, but the scheme, grant types, and scope model are all unverifiable from outside.
    Nothing is asserted.
recommendation_to_provider: >-
  Publish the OAuth authorization-server metadata (or an OIDC discovery document) anonymously
  and allow /.well-known/ through the WAF. Discovery documents are designed to be public and
  gating them buys no security while making the API undiscoverable to every SDK generator and
  agent runtime.