generated: '2026-08-13' method: probed source: >- https://developers.evolv.ai/ (Evolv's published Participant API documentation) plus live unauthenticated responses from https://participants.evolv.ai/v1/... limit_count: 0 limits: [] headers_observed: [] status_on_exhaustion: null retry_after: false detail: >- Evolv publishes no rate limits for the Participant API. The developer portal (a Postman documenter at developers.evolv.ai) documents seven operations across allocations, events, preallocations and configuration, and none of them mentions a quota, a throttle, a burst allowance or a 429 response. Live responses were inspected for runtime signalling and carry none: a 404 from https://participants.evolv.ai/v1/test/allocations returned only `content-type`, `access-control-allow-origin`, `access-control-allow-credentials`, `cache-control`, `pragma`, `expires` and CloudFront's `x-cache`/`via`/`x-amz-cf-id` — no `X-RateLimit-*`, no `RateLimit-*`, no `Retry-After`. An agent calling this API has no way to learn its budget before or after exhausting it. throttling_note: >- Evolv does document "throttling", but it is an experiment concept, not a transport one: the allocations endpoint "respects experiment throttling and audience filters", meaning a participant may be excluded from an experiment (`excluded: true` in the allocation record) rather than rate-limited. That is a sampling control, not an API rate limit, and it is recorded here only so the two are not confused. evidence: - url: https://developers.evolv.ai/ status: 200 finding: >- Full published API reference; no rate limit, quota or 429 documented on any of the seven operations. - url: https://participants.evolv.ai/v1/test/allocations status: 404 finding: No rate-limit headers of any family present on the response. - url: https://participants.evolv.ai/v1/test/preallocations?count=2 status: 500 finding: No rate-limit headers present. checked: '2026-08-13' notes: >- An honest zero. Absence recorded from both the documentation and the live response headers; nothing was assumed from the vendor category.