generated: '2026-09-10' method: searched source: >- Ford's own OpenID Connect discovery document (saved verbatim at well-known/ford-openid-configuration.json) plus the Ford Developer Marketplace content bundle at https://developer.ford.com/assets/i18n/en.json summary: asserted: 4 conforms: 3 domain_standard: none-found conformance: - id: oauth2 name: OAuth 2.0 (RFC 6749) authorization code grant conforms: true evidence: >- https://dah2vb2cprod.b2clogin.com/914d88b1-3523-4bf6-9be4-1b96b4f6f919/B2C_1A_signup_signin_common/v2.0/.well-known/openid-configuration (HTTP 200) advertises authorization_endpoint, token_endpoint and response_types_supported including "code"; token_endpoint_auth_methods_supported lists client_secret_post and client_secret_basic. checked: '2026-09-10' - id: oidc name: OpenID Connect Discovery 1.0 conforms: true evidence: >- A conformant discovery document is served at the policy-qualified /v2.0/.well-known/openid-configuration path, carrying issuer, jwks_uri, scopes_supported ["openid"], subject_types_supported ["pairwise"] and id_token_signing_alg_values_supported ["RS256"]. checked: '2026-09-10' - id: bearer-token-rfc6750 name: OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token Usage (RFC 6750) conforms: true evidence: >- An unauthenticated GET to https://api.vehicle.ford.com/api/fordconnect/vehicleinfo/v3/vehicles returned HTTP 401 on 2026-09-10, consistent with bearer-token protection of the FordConnect resource surface. checked: '2026-09-10' note: >- The 401 carried no WWW-Authenticate challenge we could read, so this is conformance to the token model, not to the full challenge semantics. - id: rfc9457 name: RFC 9457 Problem Details for HTTP APIs conforms: false evidence: >- No application/problem+json media type appears in any Ford contract or documentation reachable without credentials, and the 401 observed on api.vehicle.ford.com carried an empty body. checked: '2026-09-10' domain_standards: searched: - standard: ISO 20078 (Extended Vehicle "ExVe" web services) result: not-declared note: >- ISO 20078/20080 are the automotive domain standards for third-party access to in-vehicle data. Ford names neither in any anonymously reachable page, and its FordConnect resource shapes (/api/fordconnect/vehicleinfo/v3/...) are proprietary rather than ExVe-shaped. - standard: COVESA / VSS (Vehicle Signal Specification) result: not-declared note: >- Ford's published data dictionary (136 signals — see vocabulary/ford-data-dictionary.yml) uses its own UPPER_SNAKE_CASE signal names (SPEED, XEV_PLUG_CHARGER_STATUS, TIRE_PRESSURE...) and does not reference the COVESA VSS dot-path tree. The names are recognisably the same domain but are not a declared conformance. - standard: EU Data Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/2854) in-vehicle data access result: referenced-in-flow note: >- Ford's credential-creation flow carries a Data Act certification checkbox — "If I am making a data request under the Data Act, I certify that I am in the EU and agree to these terms" — which is a regulatory gate rather than a technical conformance. Recorded here because it is the one named regime Ford's own API onboarding asks about. evidence: https://developer.ford.com/assets/i18n/en.json result: >- No domain standard is declared by a Ford contract. Reward-only check — recorded as absent, not as a failure. compliance: certifications_published: none-found searched: - https://developer.ford.com/apis - https://developer.ford.com/about-us - trust.ford.com (DNS did not resolve) note: >- No SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / PCI / FedRAMP claim and no trust center were found on any anonymously reachable Ford developer surface, so no Compliance pointer is emitted.