generated: '2026-08-25' method: searched source: >- registry.npmjs.org (direct lookup + text search), pypi.org, rubygems.org, crates.io, api.nuget.org, search.maven.org, proxy.golang.org, and the provider's own site. Searched 2026-08-25. summary: >- No first-party client library exists on any registry, because there is no API programme to write one for. This is a verified absence, not an unchecked field. packages: [] package_count: 0 official_count: 0 searched: - registry: npm queries: [local-infusion, mylocalinfusion, "local infusion"] result: >- 404 on both direct lookups. The text search returns only unrelated packages (infusion, complex-esm, import-local, kettle, @expo/local-build-cache-provider). No first-party package. version: null published: null - registry: pypi queries: [local-infusion, mylocalinfusion] result: No package. version: null published: null - registry: rubygems result: No package. version: null published: null - registry: crates.io result: No package. version: null published: null - registry: nuget result: No package. version: null published: null - registry: maven-central result: No package. version: null published: null - registry: go result: No module. version: null published: null - registry: cdn result: >- No first-party CDN-distributed build. The site loads WordPress core, Yoast, Block Visibility, WP Rocket, Wordfence and a HubSpot tracker — all third-party vendor assets, none of them a Local Infusion client library. version: null published: null source_code: github_org_probed: - url: https://api.github.com/orgs/local-infusion status: 404 - url: https://api.github.com/orgs/mylocalinfusion status: 404 result: >- No GitHub organisation under either name. No SDK, CLI or SourceCode link exists in apis.yml to derive candidates from. checked: '2026-08-25' note: >- A consumer of the one useful endpoint here (/wp-json/wp/v2/location) does not need an SDK — any WordPress REST client works, and there are mature third-party ones on npm and PyPI. Those are not listed as packages for this provider because they are not this provider's, which is exactly the distinction `official` exists to draw. No `SDKs` pointer is emitted.