generated: '2026-08-26' method: derived source: openapi/openenvoy-openapi.json + postman/openenvoy-postman-collection.json + https://www.openenvoy.com/llms.txt note: >- Assessed against the published contract, not against marketing claims. OpenEnvoy's llms.txt states the platform supports "global compliance standards" for e-invoicing and complies with SOX and GDPR, but the security page that would evidence this is behind a Cloudflare bot challenge for our crawler and no trust center or certification listing was reachable, so no Compliance pointer is emitted. standards: - id: openapi conforms: false evidence: >- The provider publishes Swagger 2.0 (openapi/openenvoy-openapi.json, `swagger: "2.0"`), not OpenAPI 3.x. It is a valid machine-readable contract but predates OpenAPI 3.0 (2017). - id: oauth2 conforms: false evidence: No oauth2 securityDefinition; authentication is a static client id plus bearer token. - id: oidc conforms: false evidence: /.well-known/openid-configuration returned 404 on every host. - id: rfc9457 conforms: false evidence: >- Errors return application/json with proprietary keys (errorCode/errorMessage/key), not application/problem+json. See errors/openenvoy-problem-types.yml. - id: rfc8594 conforms: false evidence: No Sunset or Deprecation headers documented or observed. - id: rfc9116 conforms: false evidence: /.well-known/security.txt returned 404 on all six hosts. - id: idempotency conforms: false evidence: No Idempotency-Key or equivalent replay-protection mechanism in the contract or docs. - id: pagination conforms: false evidence: No limit/offset/cursor parameters on any collection operation. - id: 'json:api' conforms: false evidence: Plain JSON resource representations; no JSON:API document structure. - id: rate-limit-headers conforms: false evidence: No RateLimit-* or X-RateLimit-* headers documented or observed. - id: https-only conforms: false evidence: >- The published definition declares `schemes: ["http"]`. The deployment does serve HTTPS, but backend.openenvoy.io returns no HSTS header (security/openenvoy-domain-security.yml). domain_standard: market: accounts payable / e-invoicing / procure-to-pay candidates_probed: - id: peppol conforms: unknown evidence: >- No PEPPOL participant identifier, BIS Billing 3.0 shape, UBL or AS4 surface appears anywhere in the published contract. OpenEnvoy markets e-invoicing with "global compliance standards" but names no standard on any page reachable to us. - id: ubl conforms: false evidence: >- The InvoiceInfo/LineItems schemas are a bespoke flat model (number, date, due_date, payment_terms, amount_due, currency, seller, buyer, line_items) with no UBL element names, namespaces or cbc/cac prefixes. - id: 'edifact-invoic' conforms: false evidence: No EDIFACT message type or segment structure in the contract. - id: 'x12-810' conforms: false evidence: >- No X12 810 (Invoice) or 850 (Purchase Order) transaction-set shape in the contract, despite the product ingesting EDI per its own platform page. - id: 'iso-20022' conforms: false evidence: No ISO 20022 message identifiers in the payment_information object. - id: 'factur-x / zugferd' conforms: false evidence: No hybrid PDF/XML profile declared on the document ingest endpoints. result: none-declared note: >- REWARD-ONLY dimension, and OpenEnvoy earns nothing here — not because its market lacks a standard, but because it has one (PEPPOL/UBL for e-invoicing, X12/EDIFACT for procure-to-pay) and the contract declares none of it. The API accepts an invoice as an opaque uploaded FILE and returns a proprietary extracted model, so a buyer who already speaks UBL or X12 gets no standards-native path and needs a bespoke connector. This is a genuine, specific gap rather than an absent-market exemption. compliance_claims: - claim: SOX and GDPR compliance, encrypted storage, access controls, audit logs source: https://www.openenvoy.com/llms.txt (describing https://www.openenvoy.com/security) verified: false note: >- Claim is taken from OpenEnvoy's own llms.txt description of its security page. The security page itself returned HTTP 403 to our crawler (Cloudflare bot challenge), so the claim could not be read at source and no certification (SOC 2, ISO 27001) was evidenced. Not scored as Compliance. - claim: multi-currency and global e-invoicing compliance standards source: https://www.openenvoy.com/llms.txt verified: false note: No standard is named. Multi-currency IS evidenced in the contract (MatchingLineItems carries invoice_currency, matched_currency and exchange_rate).