generated: '2026-08-26' method: searched source: https://www.payem.co/legal/security-and-compliance + openapi/payem-ai-discovery-openapi.json conformance: - id: openapi-3.1 conforms: true evidence: >- openapi/payem-ai-discovery-openapi.json declares "openapi": "3.1.0" and parses, with 10 documented operations, unique operationIds and a components.schemas entry. - id: schema-org conforms: true evidence: >- Every 200 response is schema.org JSON-LD - Organization on /business, OfferCatalog with itemListElement on /products, FAQPage on /faq, Dataset on knowledge.json - served as application/ld+json with an @context of https://schema.org. - id: json-ld conforms: true evidence: 'Content-Type: application/ld+json on /business; @context/@graph document structure.' - id: rfc9457 conforms: false evidence: >- Errors are a bespoke {error, requested_endpoint, available_endpoints} JSON object. No application/problem+json anywhere. - id: oauth2 conforms: false evidence: No oauth2 securityScheme in the spec; /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server 404 on payem.co. - id: oidc conforms: false evidence: >- /.well-known/openid-configuration returns 404 on payem.co. PayEm does support SAML SSO into the application via an external IdP (Google, Okta) per its security page, but that is SAML, not OIDC, and it is an application login rather than an API surface. - id: idempotency conforms: na evidence: Read-only contract, no write operations. See conventions/payem-conventions.yml. - id: pagination conforms: false evidence: skills.json declares pagination false; no cursor or offset parameters exist. - id: rfc8594 conforms: false evidence: No Deprecation or Sunset headers observed or documented. - id: rfc9116 conforms: false evidence: /.well-known/security.txt returns 404 on www.payem.co and 403 on app.payemcard.com. - id: cors conforms: true evidence: 'access-control-allow-origin: * with an explicit allow-headers/allow-methods set on every response.' - id: hsts conforms: true evidence: 'strict-transport-security: max-age=63072000 on www.payem.co (see security/payem-domain-security.yml).' domain_standard: market: spend management / accounts payable / procurement candidates_probed: - standard: ISO 20022 conforms: false evidence: >- No pain.001/camt message type, no ISO 20022 identifier and no payment-initiation surface appears in the contract or in any public PayEm document. PayEm makes cross-border payments through partners rather than publishing a payments contract. - standard: ANSI X12 / EDIFACT (810 invoice, 850 purchase order) conforms: false evidence: >- PayEm markets purchase orders and invoice processing, but exposes them only through native ERP connectors (NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, Priority ERP, Xero). No EDI transaction set, no envelope and no message schema is published. - standard: Open Peppol / UBL conforms: false evidence: No Peppol participant identifier or UBL invoice schema is published. - standard: PSD2 / Open Banking conforms: false evidence: >- Not applicable - PayEm is a US/Israel spend-management platform issuing cards through partners, not a regulated account-servicing payment service provider, and it publishes no account-information or payment-initiation API. conforms: false note: >- Reward-only dimension. PayEm's market does have candidate standards (ISO 20022 for payment messages, X12 810/850 for invoices and purchase orders, Peppol/UBL for e-invoicing) and PayEm conforms to none of them in any published contract. This is recorded as an honest negative, not a penalty - PayEm publishes no product contract at all, so there is nothing in which a domain standard could have been declared. compliance: certifications: - SOC 1 Type II - SOC 2 Type II regimes: - GDPR - CCPA auditor: EY audit_cadence: annual source: https://www.payem.co/legal/security-and-compliance detail_pages: - https://www.payem.co/legal/soc-2 - https://www.payem.co/legal/soc-1-type-ii-compliant trust_center: https://security.payem.co/ security_controls_published: - multi-factor authentication (required) - SAML SSO via external IdP - encryption in transit (HTTPS) and at rest (AES-256 or higher) - in-field encryption for sensitive data - least-privilege access with audit logging - continuous automated penetration testing - WAF and rate limiting against brute force