generated: '2026-08-26'
method: probed
source: https://www.peekpro.com/.well-known/security.txt
security_txt:
  served: true
  url: https://www.peekpro.com/.well-known/security.txt
  http_status: 200
  content_type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
  canonical: https://peekpro.com/.well-known/security.txt
  contact: mailto:security@peek.com
  expires: '2027-05-19T00:00:00.000Z'
  preferred_languages: en
  expired: false
  file: well-known/peek-security.txt
  fields_present: [Contact, Expires, Preferred-Languages, Canonical]
  fields_absent: [Policy, Encryption, Acknowledgments, Hiring, CSAF]
disclosure_channel:
  type: email
  address: security@peek.com
  documented_policy_url: null
bug_bounty:
  program: null
  platforms_checked: [HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti]
  found: false
grade: contact-only
notes:
- >-
  Peek publishes a valid, unexpired RFC 9116 security.txt with a dedicated security@peek.com contact — a
  real, machine-discoverable disclosure channel. It carries no Policy: line, so there is no published
  disclosure policy or safe-harbour statement to read, and no bug bounty program was found.
- >-
  The security.txt is served only from the Peek Pro marketing host (www.peekpro.com). peek.com,
  octo.peek.com and octodocs.peek.com all 404 on /.well-known/security.txt, so a researcher who starts at
  the API host or the consumer marketplace will not find it. The Canonical field points at
  peekpro.com/.well-known/security.txt.
x-evidence:
- url: https://www.peekpro.com/.well-known/security.txt
  http_status: 200
  fetched: '2026-08-26'
- url: https://www.peek.com/.well-known/security.txt
  http_status: 404
  fetched: '2026-08-26'
- url: https://octo.peek.com/.well-known/security.txt
  http_status: 404
  fetched: '2026-08-26'